Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:43:37.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dioecious Amaranthus spp.: Here to Stay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Lawrence E. Steckel
Lawrence E. Steckel*
Affiliation:
University of Tennessee, 605 Airways Boulevard. Jackson, TN 38301
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: lsteckel@utk.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“Bid amaranthus all his beauty shed, And daffodils fill their cups with tears, To stew the laurate hearse where Lycid lies.” Paradise Lost, John Milton (1667)

“Immortal amaranth, a flower which once In Paradise, fast by the Tree of Life, Began to bloom, but soon for Man's offence, To Heav'n remov'd, where first it grew, there grows, And flours aloft shading the Fount of Life.” Paradise Lost, John Milton (1667)

“There are no fields of amaranth on this side of the grave” Imaginary Conversations “Aesop and Rhodope” in works of Walter Savage Landor (1846)

“Weeds never die” Danish proverb

There are nearly 75 species in the genus Amaranthus, part of the Amaranthaceae family, worldwide. In this large genus, there is a distinct group of 10 species that are dioecious (separate male and female plants). In contrast to the monoecious Amaranthus spp. which are represented by species endemic to every continent, the dioecious Amaranthus spp. are all native to North America. The Amaranthus spp. have a long documented history of being fellow travelers with humans. In recent years, three dioecious Amaranthus spp.: Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.), common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis Sauer), and tall waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq) Sauer] have become major weeds to row crops in North America. Palmer amaranth has become a very troublesome weed to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production in large parts of the southern United States, and the waterhemp complex is now a major weed pest in corn and soybean production in the midwestern United States (Horak and Loughin 2000; King 1966; Mabberly 1997; Robertson 1981; Sauer 1950, 1955, 1972; Wax 1995).

Type
Intriguing World of Weeds
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 567 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aellen, P. 1959. Amaranthus L. Pages 465–516 in Hegi, G. ed. Illustrierte Flora Von Mitteleuropa. 3 (2):Google Scholar
Bensch, C. N., Horak, M. J., and Peterson, D. 2003. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci. 51:37–43.Google Scholar
Britton, N. L. and Brown, A. 1898. An Illustrated Flora of the Northern United States, Canada, and the British Possessions. Volume 1. New York Charles Scribners Sons. 612.Google Scholar
Burrouis, G. E. and Tyrl, R. J. 2001. Toxic Plants of North America. Ames, IA Iowa State University Press. 1342.Google Scholar
Darlington, W. 1859. American Weeds and Useful Plants. New York Orange Judd. 460.Google Scholar
Ehleringer, J. 1983. Ecophysiology of Amaranthus palmeri, a Sonoran Desert summer annual. Oecologia 57:107–112.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. C. 1998. Photosynthetic organs of desert plants. Bioscience 48:914.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. and Cronquist, A. 1991. Family Amaranthaceae, the Amaranth Family. in Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York Botanical Garden. 104–108.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G., Buhler, D. D., and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1999. Emergence characteristics of four annual weed species. Weed Sci. 47:578–584.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2006. The International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed: March 1, 2006.Google Scholar
Heywood, V. H. 1993. Flowering Plants of the World. New York Oxford University Press. 335.Google Scholar
Horak, M. J. 2000. Biology and management of Palmer amaranth: the new weed on the block. in Proceedings of the Illinois Crop Protection Technology conference. Urbana, IL University of Illinois. 21.Google Scholar
Horak, M. J. and Loughin, T. M. 2000. Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Sci. 48:347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horak, M. J. and Peterson, D. E. 1995. Biotypes of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol. 9:192–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horak, M. J., Peterson, D. E., Chessman, D. J., and Wax, L. M. 1994. Pigweed identification: A pictorial guide to the common pigweeds of the Great Plains. Manhattan, KS Kansas Cooperative Extension Service Publication S80. 12.Google Scholar
Hyman, R. and Pankhurst, P. 1995. Plants and Their Names, A Concise Dictionary. Oxford, Great Britain Oxford University Press. 545.Google Scholar
Jeschke, M. R., Tranel, P. J., and Rayburn, A. L. 2003. DNA analysis of smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and tall waterhemp (A. tuberculatus): implications for hybrid detection. Weed Sci. 51:1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindscher, K. 1987. Edible Wild Plants of the Prairie: An Ethnobotanical Guide. Lawrence, KS University Press of Kansas. 276.Google Scholar
King, L. J. 1966. Weeds of the World. New York Interscience Publishers. 526.Google Scholar
Mabberly, D. J. 1997. The Plant Book. New York Cambridge University Press. 859.Google Scholar
Massinga, R. A., Currie, R. S., Horak, M. J., and Boyer, J. Jr. 2001. Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci. 49:202–208.Google Scholar
Moerman, D. E. 1998. Native American Ethnobotany. Portland, OR Timber.Google Scholar
Mosyakin, S. L. and Robertson, K. R. 1996. New infrageneric taxa and combinations in Amaranthus (Amaranthaceae). Ann. Bot. 33:275–281.Google Scholar
Murray, M. J. 1940. The genetics of sex determination in the family Amaranthaceae. Genetics 25:409–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratt, D. B. and Clark, L. G. 2001. Amaranthus rudis and A. tuberculatus—one species or two? J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 128:282–296.Google Scholar
Robertson, K. R. 1981. The genera of Amaranthaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 62:267–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, J. D. 1950. The grain amaranths: a survey of their history and classification. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 37:561–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, J. D. 1955. Revision of the dioecious amaranths. Madrono 13:5–46.Google Scholar
Sauer, J. D. 1957. Recent migration and evolution of the dioecious amaranths. Evolution 11:11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, J. D. 1967. The grain amaranths and their relatives: A revised taxonomic and geographic survey. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 54:103–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, J. D. 1972. The dioecious amaranths: a new species name and major range extensions. Madrono 21:426–434.Google Scholar
Singh, H. 1961. Grain amaranths, buckwheat and chenopods. Indian Counc. Agric. Res. Cereal Crop Ser. 1:1–46.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., and Wax, L. M. 1997. Response of an acetolactate synthase (ALS)-resistant biotype of Amaranthus rudis to selected ALS-inhibiting and alternative herbicides. Weed Res. 37:93–101.Google Scholar
Standley, P. C. 1917. Amaranthaceae. North Am. Flora 21:95–169.Google Scholar
Steckel, L. E. and Sprague, C. L. 2004a. Late-season common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 18:947–952.Google Scholar
Steckel, L. E. and Sprague, C. L. 2004b. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 52:359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, L. E., Sprague, C. L., Hager, A. G., Simmons, F. W., and Bollero, G. 2003. Effects of shading on common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) growth and development. Weed Sci. 52:898–903.Google Scholar
Steckel, L. E., Sprague, C. L., Stoller, E. W., Bollero, G., and Wax, L. M. 2004. Temperature effects on germination of nine Amaranthus species. Weed Sci. 52:217–221.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. D. 2006. Tarnished Plant Bug. http://www.utextension.utk.edu/fieldCrops/cotton/cotton_insects/Pests/tarnished_plant_bug.htm Accessed: February 19, 2006.Google Scholar
Tranel, P. J., Wassom, J. J., Jeschke, M. R., and Rayburn, A. L. 2002. Transmission of herbicide resistance from a monoecious to a dioecious weedy Amaranthus species . Theor. Appl. Genet. 105:674–679.Google Scholar
Trucco, F., Jeschke, M. R., Rayburn, A. L., and Tranel, P. J. 2005. Promiscuity in weedy amaranths: high frequency of female waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) × smooth pigweed (A. hybridus) hybridization under field conditions. Weed Sci. 53:46–54.Google Scholar
Wax, L. M. 1995. Pigweeds of the Midwest: distribution, importance and management. Proc. Iowa Integr. Crop Manag. Conf. 7:239–242.Google Scholar
Wetzel, D. K., Horak, M. J., Skinner, D. Z., and Kulakow, P. A. 1999. Transferal of herbicide resistance traits from Amaranthus palmeri to Amaranthus rudis . Weed Sci. 47:538–543.Google Scholar
[USDA/NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture–National Resources Conservation Service 2006. Plant Profile of Amaranthus cannabinus . http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=AMCA2. Accessed: February 2006.Google Scholar