Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:22:50.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution of herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in row crop production systems in Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2019

Russ Garetson ,
Vijay Singh Open the ORCID record for Vijay Singh [Opens in a new window] ,
Shilpa Singh ,
Peter Dotray  and
Muthukumar Bagavathiannan Open the ORCID record for Muthukumar Bagavathiannan [Opens in a new window]
Russ Garetson
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Vijay Singh
Affiliation:
Assistant Research Scientist, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Shilpa Singh
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Peter Dotray
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA
Muthukumar Bagavathiannan*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Muthukumar Bagavathiannan, Email: muthu@tamu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A state-level survey was conducted across major row-crop production regions of Texas to document the level of sensitivity of Palmer amaranth to glyphosate, atrazine, pyrithiobac, tembotrione, fomesafen, and dicamba. Between 137 and 161 Palmer amaranth populations were evaluated for sensitivity to the labelled field rate (1X), and rated as resistant (≤49% injury), less sensitive (50% to 89% injury), or susceptible (90% to 100% injury). For glyphosate, 62%, 19%, 13%, and 13% of the populations from the High Plains, Central Texas, Rio Grande Valley, and Lower Gulf Coast, respectively, were resistant. Resistance to atrazine was more common in Palmer amaranth populations from the High Plains than in other regions, with 16% of the populations resistant and 22% less sensitive. Approximately 90% of the populations from the High Plains that exhibited resistance to atrazine POST also were resistant to atrazine PRE. Of the 160 populations tested for pyrithiobac, approximately 99% were resistant or less sensitive, regardless of the region. No resistance was found to fomesafen, tembotrione, or dicamba. However, 22% of the populations from the High Plains were less sensitive to 1X (93 g ai ha−1) tembotrione, but were killed at 2X, illustrating the background variability in sensitivity to this herbicide. For dicamba, three populations, all from the High Plains, exhibited less sensitivity at the 1X rate (controlled at the 2X rate; 1X = 560 g ae ha−1). One population exhibited multiple resistance to three herbicides with distinct sites of action (SOAs) involving acetolactate synthase, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, and photosystem II inhibitors. Palmer amaranth populations exhibited less sensitivity to approximately 15 combinations of herbicides involving up to five SOAs. Dose-response assays conducted on the populations most resistant to glyphosate, pyrithiobac, or atrazine indicated they were 30-, 32-, or 49-fold or more resistant to these herbicides, respectively, compared with a susceptible standard.

Keywords

AtrazinedicambafomesafenglyphosatepyrithiobactembotrionePalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Watsonmultiple-herbicide resistanceresistance surveysite of actionrecurrent selectiondose response
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 355 - 365
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagavathiannan, MV, Norsworthy, JK (2016) Multiple-herbicide resistance is widespread in roadside Palmer amaranth populations. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0148748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bensch, CN, Horak, MJ, Peterson, D (2003) Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci 51:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernards, ML, Crespo, RJ, Kruger, GR, Gaussoin, R, Tranel, PJ (2012) A waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population resistant to 2, 4-D. Weed Sci 60:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busi, R, Neve, P, Powles, S (2013) Evolved polygenic herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum by low-dose herbicide selection within standing genetic variation. Evol Appl 6:231–242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chahal, PS, Varanasi, VK, Jugulam, M, Jhala, AJ (2017) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Nebraska: confirmation, EPSPS gene amplification, and response to POST corn and soybean herbicides. Weed Technol 31:80–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cline, H (2013) Palmer Amaranth Resistance Spreads in Texas High Plains. http://southwestfarmpress.com/cotton/palmer-amaranth-resistance-spreads-texas-high-plains, Accessed: May 31, 2017Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Vencill, WK, Kichler, JM, Webster, TM, Brown, SM, York, AC, Davis, JW, Hanna, WW (2006) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 54:620–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fast, BJ, Murdock, SW, Farris, RL, Willis, JB, Murray, DS (2009) Critical timing of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) removal in second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton. J Cotton Sci 13:32–36Google Scholar
Gressel, J (1995) Creeping resistances: the outcome of using marginally-effective or reduced rates of herbicides. In Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference–Weeds. Farnham, UK: British Crop Protection Council. Pp 587–590Google Scholar
Heap, IM (2019) International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Assessed: March 27, 2019Google Scholar
Horak, MJ, Peterson, DE (1995) Biotypes of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol 9:192–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, P, Norsworthy, JK, Malik, MS, Bangarwa, SK, Oliveira, MJ (2006) Temporal emergence of Palmer amaranth from a natural seedbank. Proc South Weed Sci 59:177Google Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Sandell, LD, Rana, N, Kruger, GR, Knezevic, SZ (2014) Confirmation and control of triazine and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase-inhibiting herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Nebraska. Weed Technol 28:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jugulam, M, Hall, JC, Johnson, WG, Kelley, KB, Riechers, DE (2011) Evolution of resistance to auxinic herbicides: historical perspectives, mechanisms of resistance, and implications for broadleaf weed management in agronomic crops. Weed Sci 59:445–457Google Scholar
Kumar, V, Liu, R, Boyer, G, Stahlman, PW (2019) Confirmation of 2, 4-D resistance and identification of multiple resistance in a Kansas Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) population. Pest Manag Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, R, Kaundan, SS, Tranel, PJ, Riggins, CW, McGinness, DL, Hager, AG, Hawkes, T, McIndoe, E, Riechers, DE (2013) Distinct detoxification mechanisms confer resistance to mesotrione and atrazine in a population of waterhemp. Plant Physiol 163:363–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massinga, RA, Currie, RS, Horak, MJ, Boyer, J Jr (2001) Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci 49:202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, BJ, Falco, SC (1989) The development of herbicide resistant crops. Annu Rev Plant Biol 40:441–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinty, J, Baumann, P, Dotray, P (2015) Get Ready for a Fight: Glyphosate Resistant Waterhemp and Palmer Amaranth Are Here! https://agrilife.org/texasrowcrops/2015/03/06/get-ready-for-a-fight-glyphosate-resistant-waterhemp-and-palmer-amaranth-are-here/ Accessed: March 10, 2019Google Scholar
Moore, JW, Murray, DS, Westerman, RB (2004) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) effects on the harvest and yield of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Technol 18:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandula, VK, Reddy, KN, Koger, CH, Poston, DH, Rimando, AM, Duke, SO, Bond, JA, Ribeiro, DN (2012) Multiple resistance to glyphosate and pyrithiobac in Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) from Mississippi and response to flumiclorac. Weed Sci 60:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neve, P, Powles, S (2005) Recurrent selection with reduced herbicide rates results in the rapid evolution of herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum. Theor Appl Genet 110:1154–1166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, GM, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Oliver, LR (2008) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Smith, KL, Scott, RC, Gbur, EE (2007) Consultant perspectives on weed management needs in Arkansas cotton. Weed Technol 21:825–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, et al. (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci (Special Issue I) 60:31–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, RA, Burgos, NR, Tranel, PJ, Singh, S, Glasgow, L, Scott, RC, Nichols, RL (2016) Resistance to PPO-inhibiting herbicide in Palmer amaranth from Arkansas. Pest Manag Sci 72:864–869CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauer, JD (1957) Recent migration and evolution of the dioecious amaranths. Evol 11:11–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, W, Kocher, H (2009) Tembotrione and combination partner isoxadifen-ethyl-mode of herbicidal action. Bayer Crop J 62:35–52Google Scholar
Singh, S, Singh, V, Salas, RA, Lawton-Rauh, A, Bagavathiannan, M, Burgos, N (2019) Target-site mutation accumulation among ALS-inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth. Pest Manag Sci 75:1131–1139Google ScholarPubMed
Shergill, LS, Barlow, BR, Bish, MD, Bradley, KW (2018) Investigations of 2, 4-D and multiple herbicide resistance in a Missouri waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population. Weed Sci 66:386–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimabukuro, RH (1967) Atrazine metabolism and herbicidal selectivity. Plant Physiol 42:1269–1276CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sosnoskie, LM, Kichler, JM, Wallace, RD, Culpepper, AS (2011) Multiple resistance in Palmer amaranth to glyphosate and pyrithiobac confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 59:321–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, LE, Main, CL, Ellis, AT, Mueller, TC (2008) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Tennessee has low level glyphosate resistance. Weed Technol 22:119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tehranchian, P, Norsworthy, JK, Powles, S, Bararpour, MT, Bagavathiannan, MV, Barber, T, Scott, RC (2017) Recurrent sublethal-dose selection for reduced susceptibility of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to dicamba. Weed Sci 65:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranel, PJ, Wright, TR (2002) Resistance of weeds to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: what have we learned? Weed Sci 50:700–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varanasi, VK, Brabham, C, Norsworthy, JK, Nie, H, Young, BG, Houston, M, Barber, T, Scott, RC (2018) A statewide survey of PPO-inhibitor resistance and the prevalent target-site mechanisms in Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions from Arkansas. Weed Sci 66:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, SM, Webster, TM, Steckel, LE (2013) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): a review. Weed Technol 27:12–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, AM, Grey, TL, Prostko, EP, Vencill, WK, Webster, TM (2009) Establishing geographic distribution level of acetolactate synthase resistance of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions in Georgia. Weed Technol 23:214–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Garetson et al. supplementary material

Garetson et al. supplementary material 1

Download Garetson et al. supplementary material(File)
File 238.6 KB