Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:10:16.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum) Control in Winter Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Dean G. Swan  and
Ralph E. Whitesides
Dean G. Swan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils, Wash. State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
Ralph E. Whitesides
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils, Wash. State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Metribuzin at 0.42 kg ai/ha and metribuzin plus terbutryn at 0.28 plus 0.67 kg/ha were applied in the fall and spring to control downy brome in winter wheat from 1981 through 1985. Downy brome control averaged 88% from the fall-applied treatments and 63% from the spring-applied treatments. Yields from the fall- and spring-applied treatments averaged 136% and 132% of the check, respectively. Metribuzin plus terbutryn fall-applied controlled downy brome best (93%), and wheat yields were significantly higher than the checks in all experiments. Moreover, as downy brome density among locations increased, wheat yields decreased.

Keywords

Metribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-oneterbutryn, N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-N′-ethyl-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminedowny brome, Bromus tectorum L. # BROTEwinter wheat, Triticum aestivum L.MetribuzinterbutrynBROTE
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 481 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, R. L. 1986. Metribuzin and chlorsulfuron effect on grain of treated winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 34:734–737.Google Scholar
2. Challaiah, , Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Johnson, V. A. 1986. Competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 34:689–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Hulbert, L. C. 1955. Ecological studies of Bromus tectorum and other annual bromegrasses. Ecol. Mongr. 25:181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Klemmedson, J. O., and Smith, J. G. 1964. Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.). Bot. Rev. 30:226–258.Google Scholar
5. Pacific Northwest Weed Control Handbook. 1987. p. 25. Publ. Dep. Greg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR, and Wash. State Univ., Pullman, WA.Google Scholar
6. Peeper, T. F. 1984. Chemical and biological control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in wheat and alfalfa in North America. Weed Sci. 32(Suppl. 1):18–25.Google Scholar
7. Rydrych, D. J. 1974. Competition between winter wheat and downy brome. Weed Sci. 22:211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Rydrych, D. J. 1985. Inactivation of metribuzin in winter wheat by activated carbon. Weed Sci. 33:229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Rydrych, D. J., and Muzik, T. J. 1968. Downy brome competition and control in dryland wheat. Agron. J. 60:279–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Washington Agricultural Statistics. 1985. p. 28. Wash. Crop Livestock Rep. Serv., 417 W. 4th Ave., Olympia, WA 98501.Google Scholar