Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T00:46:01.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early Postemergence Clomazone Tank Mixes on Coarse-Textured Soils in Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

S.D. Willingham*
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, 370 Olsen Blvd, College Station, TX 77843
N.R. Falkenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, 370 Olsen Blvd, College Station, TX 77843
G.N. McCauley
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Agricultural Experiment Station, Eagle Lake, TX 77434
J.M. Chandler
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, 370 Olsen Blvd, College Station, TX 77843
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: samuel.willingham@basf.com.

Abstract

Clomazone was labeled for rice in 2001; however, that label excluded its use on coarse- (light) textured soils, including sand, loamy sand, and sandy loam with less than 1% organic matter due to rice injury. Field studies conducted in 2005, 2006, and 2007 evaluated weed control and tolerance of rice to early postemergence (EPOST) applications of clomazone alone and tank mixed with other herbicides on sandy loam and clay loam soils. At 42 d after treatment (DAT), broadleaf signalgrass (BRAPP) and barnyardgrass (ECHCG) control was > 86%. At 14 DAT, rice injury was greatest (13%) from clomazone applied preemergence (PRE) at 0.44 kg ai/ha on sandy soil. Annual sedge (CYPCP) control was > 78% on sandy loam soils at 14 DAT, but increased to > 90% by 42 DAT. On clay loam soils, CYPCP control at 42 DAT ranged from 60 to 76% from clomazone alone or tank mixed with cyhalofop or fenoxaprop. All other tank mixes provided > 80% control. Hemp sesbania (SEBEX) control was > 80% from all tank mixes. Clomazone alone provided < 77% control. Data suggest that clomazone can be used EPOST in combination with other herbicides without causing significant rice injury on sandy loam soils in Texas.

Type
Weed Management—Major Crops
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous, , 2007. Command 3 ME Herbicide Label. FMC Corporation. Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld324001.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2007.Google Scholar
Baltazar, A. M. and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1994. Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 8:576581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollich, P. K., Jordan, D. L., Walker, D. M., and Burns, A. B. 2000. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to the microencapsulated formulation of clomazone. Weed Technol 14:8993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis with experiments with two or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, J. P., Doyle, R. B., and Brown, P. H. 2002. Clomazone dissipation in four Tamanian topsoils. Weed Sci 50:405409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 1995. Interactions of fenoxaprop-ethyl with bensulfuron and bentazon in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 9:724727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Bollich, P. K., Burns, A. B., and Walker, D. M. 1998. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to clomazone. Weed Sci 46:374380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L. and Kendig, J. A. 1998. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with postemergence applications of propanil and clomazone in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 12:537541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirksey, K. B., Hayes, R. M., Charger, W. A., Mullins, C. A., and Mueller, T. C. 1996. Clomazone dissipation in two Tennessee soils. Weed Sci 44:959963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, H. R. and Gage, E. V. 1999. Command 3 ME: weed control in southern rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 52:186.Google Scholar
O'Barr, J. H., McCauley, G. N., Bovey, R. W., Senseman, S. A., and Chandler, J. M. 2007. Rice response to clomazone as influenced by application rate, soil type, and planting date. Weed Technol 21:199205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems 2002. Software version 9.0. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Scherder, E. F., Talbert, R. E., and Clark, S. D. 2004. Rice (Oryza sativa) cultivar tolerance to clomazone. Weed Technol 18:140144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1988. Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice, Oryza sativa . Weed Technol 2:232241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbert, R. E. and Burgos, N. R. 2007. History and management of herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol 21:324331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, E. P., Baldwin, F. L., and Dillon, T. L. 1999. The potential for clomazone use in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 13:390393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2000. The southern states 10 most common and troublesome weeds in rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 53:247274.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Webster, E. P., and Blouin, D. C. 2005. Response of rice and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) to rates and timings of clomazone. Weed Technol 19:528531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar