Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:19:27.150Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economics of Herbicide use on Corn (Zea mays) and Soybeans (Glycine max) in Ontario

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Marvin Stemeroff
Affiliation:
Deloitte Haskins and Sells Assoc., 386 Woolwich St., Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1H 3W6
Clarence J. Swanton
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Science, Univ. Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Allan S. Hamill
Affiliation:
Agric. Can., Harrow Res. Stn., Harrow, Ontario, Canada NOR 1G0
Rudy H. Brown
Affiliation:
Dep. Hort. Biol., Ridgetown Coll. Agric. Tech., Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada NOP 2C0

Abstract

The productivity of herbicides used in corn and soybeans was calculated from field data collected in Ontario from 1967 to 1985. Combinations of preplant incorporated and preemergence treatments were selected and were evaluated to determine their effect on crop yield. Corn and soybean yields increased from herbicide use, thereby resulting in a positive net benefit to growers. Benefit/cost ratios for herbicide use in corn and soybeans were calculated to be 2.8/1 and 2.6/1, respectively, at an average price of $132/1000 kg for corn and $275/1000 kg for soybeans. The benefit/cost ratios varied with test location, method of herbicide application, and prevailing market price.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Cashman, C. M., Martin, M. A., and McCarl, B. A. 1981. Economic consequences of bans on corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) herbicides commonly used on Indiana farms. Weed Sci. 29:323–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chandler, J. M. 1981. Estimated losses of crops to weeds. p. 95109 in Pimental, D. ed. CRC Handb. Pest Manag. in Agric., Vol. 1.Google Scholar
3. Chandler, J. M., Hamill, A. S., and Thomas, A. G. 1984. Crop losses due to weeds in Canada and the United States. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
4. Hanthorn, M., and Duffy, M. 1983. Returns to corn pest management practices. U.S. Dep. Agric. Econ. Res. Serv. AER-501.Google Scholar
5. Hawkins, D. E., Slife, F. W., and Swanson, E. R. 1977. Economic anlaysis of herbicide use in various crop sequences. Ill. Agric. Econ. 17:813.Google Scholar
6. Lybecker, D. W., King, R. P., Schweizer, E. E., and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Economic analyses of two weed management systems for two cropping rotations. Weed Sci. 32:9095.Google Scholar
7. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. 1986. Agricultural Statistics for Ontario. Publ. No. 20.Google Scholar
8. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. 1987. Monthly crop and livestock report. Publ. No. 649.Google Scholar
9. Osteen, C., and Kruchler, F. 1986. Potential bans of corn and soybean pesticides: Economic implications for farms and consumers. U.S. Dep. Agric., Econ. Res. Serv. AER-546.Google Scholar
10. Stemeroff, M. 1987. The economics of herbicide use on corn and soybeans in southwestern Ontario. A Final Report for the Ontario Pesticides Advisory Committee. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto.Google Scholar