Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:34:10.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of 2,4-D on Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) Viable Seed Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jamal S. Al-Henaid ,
Mark A. Ferrell  and
Stephen D. Miller
Jamal S. Al-Henaid
Affiliation:
Everglades Res. & Ext. Cent., Belle Glade, FL 33430 Dep. Plant Soil Insect Sci., Univ. Wyo., Laramie, WY 82071
Mark A. Ferrell
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil Insect Sci., Univ. Wyo., Laramie, WY 82071
Stephen D. Miller
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Soil Insect Sci., Univ. Wyo., Laramie, WY 82071
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Leafy spurge viable seed production and germination were reduced by 2,4-D applied during flower development and seed formation, in the field. Viable seed production was reduced when 2,4-D was applied at all growth stages after the start of flower bud development. The number of viable seed from untreated plants was 173, while, the number of viable seed from plants treated 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, or 35 d after the start of flower bud development was <1, 4, 7, 31, 53, and 62; respectively. Leafy spurge seed germination was higher in gibberellic acid than in water for seed collected from untreated plants and from plants treated with 2,4-D 7, 14, and 21 d after bud initiation. This research shows that 2,4-D must be applied prior to flower bud development to prevent seed production.

Keywords

2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidgibberellic acid, 2,4a,7-trihydroxy-1-methyl-8-methylenegibb-3-ene-1,10-carboxylic acid 1→4-lactoneleafy spurge, Euphorbia esula L. # EPHESGibberellic acidgermination
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 76 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alley, H. P. and Messersmith, C. G. 1985. Chemical control of leafy spurge. p. 65–78 in Watson, A. K., ed. Leafy spurge. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., 309 W. Clark St., Champaign, IL 61820. 104 p. Google Scholar
2. Bakke, A. L. 1936. Leafy spurge, Euphorbia esula L. Iowa Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 198:209–246.Google Scholar
3. Best, K. F., Bowes, G. G., Thomas, A. G., and Maw, M. G. 1980. The biology of Canadian weeds. 39. Euphorbia esula L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 60:651–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Derscheid, L. A., Wallace, K. E., and Nash, R. L. 1960. Leafy spurge control with cultivation, cropping and chemicals. Weeds 8:115–127.Google Scholar
5. Dunn, P. H. 1979. The distribution of leafy spurge in North America (Euphorbia esula) and other weedy Euphorbia spp. in the United States. Weed Sci. 27:509–516.Google Scholar
6. Heneidi, G. S. 1987. Leafy spurge control, seed viability and germination. Ph.D. dissertation, Dep. Plant Soil Insect Sci., Univ. Wyo., Laramie, WY 82071. 70 p.Google Scholar
7. Hittle, G. F. 1983. Wyoming's leafy spurge program 1978–1982. Wyoming Dep. Agric., 2219 Carey Ave., Cheyenne, WY 82002. 39 p.Google Scholar
8. Malone, C. R. 1967. A rapid method for enumeration of viable seeds in soil. Weeds 15:381–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Selleck, G. W., Coupland, R. T., and Frankton, C. 1962. Leafy spurge in Saskatchewan. Ecol. Monogr. 32:1–29.Google Scholar
10. Wicks, G. A. and Derscheid, L. A. 1964. Leafy spurge seed maturation. Weeds 12:175–176.Google Scholar