Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:03:42.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Herbicides and Cultural Practices on Weed Communities in Vineyards: An Ohio Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Linjian Jiang
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University/Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691
Tim Koch
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University/Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691
Imed Dami
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University/Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691
Douglas Doohan*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University/Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH 44691
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: doohan.1@osu.edu

Abstract

Thirty-one Ohio vineyards were surveyed in 2004 to document weeds that persisted following weed control practices. Weeds were identified and density was determined during visits to each vineyard. Herbicide-use history, grape varieties, and grape age were recorded during interviews with the growers. Data were analyzed by SAS 9.1 with the use of the generalized linear model (GLM), and means were compared according to Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) at the 0.05 level. Crabgrass, dandelion, pigweed, foxtail, fall panicum, clover, chickweed, common ragweed, smartweed, and oxalis were the most prevalent 10 weeds in Ohio vineyards based on relative abundance values. The frequency and density of crabgrass, dandelion, fall panicum, oxalis, and common purslane were significantly higher in vineyards in which glyphosate was the only herbicide used than in vineyards where other herbicides were applied. The number of species and density were higher in vinifera vineyards that had been hilled for winter protection than in vineyards that had not been hilled.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ball, D. A. and Miller, S. D. 1993. Cropping history, tillage, and herbicide effects on weed flora composition in irrigated corn. Agron. J. 85:817821.Google Scholar
Bhatt, R. and Khera, K. L. 2006. Effect of tillage and mode of straw mulch application on soil erosion in the submontaneous tract of Punjab, India. Soil Till. Res. 88:107115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. 2006. Glyphosate-induced weed shifts. Weed Technol. 20:277281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Grey, T. L., Vencill, W. K., Kichler, J. M., Webster, T. M., Brown, S. M., York, A. C., Davis, J. W., and Hanna, W. W. 2006. Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci. 54:620626.Google Scholar
Czapar, G. F. and Fawcett, R. S. 1997. Wirestem muhly. North Central Regional Extension. Publication 260.Google Scholar
Dami, I., Bordelon, B., Ferree, D. C., Brown, M., Ellis, M. A., Williams, R. N., and Doohan, D. 2005. Midwest grape production guide. Bulletin 919. The Ohio State University Extension.Google Scholar
Dami, I. E., Steiner, T. E., and Ji, T. 2006. Ohio Grape and Wine Industry Survey—Production, Research, and Education Priorities. Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Special Circular 198. 1318.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O. 2005. Taking stock of herbicide-resistant crops ten years after introduction. Pest Manag. Sci. 61:211218.Google Scholar
Gish, T. J., Shirmohammadi, A., Vyravipillai, R., and Wienhold, B. J. 1995. Herbicide leaching under tilled and no-tillage fields. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59:895901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I. 2006. The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. www.weedscience.com. Accessed: January 16, 2007.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 1997. The occurrence of herbicide-resistant weeds worldwide. Pestic. Sci. 51:235243.3.0.CO;2-N>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, T. J., Neal, J. C., Ditomaso, J. M., and Rossi, F. S. 2002. A survey of weed scientists' perceptions on the significance of crabgrasses (Digitaria spp.) in the United States. Weed Technol. 16:239242.Google Scholar
Kurtural, S. K. 2005. Winter protection for grafted grape vines. Kentucky Fruit Facts. October 2005.Google Scholar
Ohio Grape Industries Committee 2007. Ohio wine and education. Available: http://www.ohgrapes.org/education.php. Accessed: June 22, 2007.Google Scholar
Shepherd, T. G., Saggar, S., Newman, R. H., Ross, C. W., and Dando, J. L. 2001. Tillage-induced changes to soil structure and organic carbon fractions in New Zealand soils. Aust. J. Soil Res. 39:465489.Google Scholar
Stewart-Wade, S. M., Neumann, S., Collins, L. L., and Boland, G. J. 2002. The biology of Canadian weeds. 117. Taraxacum officinale G. H. Weber ex Wiggers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82:825853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tharp, B. E. and Kells, J. J. 2002. Residual herbicides used in combination with glyphosate and glufosinate in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 16:274281.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G. 1985. Weed survey system used in Saskatchewan for cereal and oilseed crops. Weed Sci. 33:3443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuesca, D., Puricelli, E., and Papa, J. C. 2001. A long-term study of weed flora shifts in different tillage systems. Weed Res. 41:369382.Google Scholar
Viticulture Consortium East 2007. Ohio grape research priorities from the Ohio grape industries committee 2007. http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/adm/rfpgrapersch/pdf/Ohio.pdf. Accessed: June 25, 2007.Google Scholar