Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:03:28.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of MSMA on Entireleaf Morningglory (Ipomoea Hederacea var. Integriuscula) Control with Postemergence Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Jordan ,
Marilyn R. McClelland ,
Robert E. Frans  and
J. Andrew Kendig
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Ark., Fayetteville, AR 72703
Marilyn R. McClelland
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Ark., Fayetteville, AR 72703
Robert E. Frans
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Ark., Fayetteville, AR 72703
J. Andrew Kendig
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Missouri, Delta Center, Portageville, MO 63873
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted from 1989 through 1991 to determine the effect of MSMA on efficacy of fluometuron, cyanazine, oxyfluorfen, lactofen, methazole, diuron, and linuron applied POST to entireleaf morningglory. In one set of experiments, applications were made at the cotyledon to three-leaf and four- to six-leaf stages of weed growth. In another set of experiments, applications were made at only one growth stage. Cyanazine, MSMA, or cyanazine plus MSMA were the most efficacious treatments, especially when application was delayed until the four- to six-leaf stage. Adding MSMA to all of the herbicides increased control of entireleaf morningglory, with the magnitude of improvement increasing as the application timing was delayed.

Keywords

Cyanazine, 2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-methylpropanenitrilediuron, N′-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N,N-dimethylureafluometuron, N,N-dimethyl-N′-[(3-trifluoromethyl)phenyl]urealactofen, (±)-2-ethoxy-1-methyl-2-oxyethyl-5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)-phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoatelinuron, N′-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methylureamethazole, 2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazolidine-3,5- dioneMSMA, monosodium salt of methylarsonic acidoxyfluorfen, 2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4-nitrophenoxy)-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzeneentireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHGCyanazinediuronfluometuronlactofenlinuronmethazoleoxyfluorfeninteractionGossypium hirsutumIPOHG
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 36 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, R. S. and Hurst, H. R. 1990. Morningglory control in Mississippi. p. 361–362 in Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Las Vegas, NV, Jan. 9–14, 1990. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
2. DeFelice, M. S. and Sims, B. D. 1991. Herbicide field evaluation report 1991. Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Missouri, Agronomy Misc. Publ. 0091–05. 658 p.Google Scholar
3. Elmore, C. D. 1990. Identification and distribution of morningglory species in the cotton belt. p. 358 in Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Las Vegas, NV, Jan. 9–14, 1990. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
4. Frans, R. E., Jordan, D. L., and McClelland, M. R. 1990. Morningglory management in Arkansas cotton. p. 364 in Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Las Vegas, NV. Jan. 9–14, 1990. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
5. Guethle, D. R. and Sims, B. D. 1990. Morningglory control systems in Missouri cotton. pp. 363–364 in Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Las Vegas, NV. Jan. 9–14, 1990. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
6. Guthrie, D. S. 1987. Fruiting profile of cotton following application of fluometuron and MSMA. p. 346 in Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Dallas, TX. Jan. 4–8, 1987. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
7. Harvey, L. H., Murdock, E. C., Poston, D. H., and Toler, J. E. 1990. Response of cotton, prickly sida, and pitted morningglory to directed herbicides with and without MSMA. p. 358 in Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Las Vegas, NV. Jan. 9–14, 1990. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
8. Hayes, R. M. and Hoskinson, P. E. 1990. Competition, cost, and control of morningglories. p. 363 in Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Las Vegas, NV, Jan. 9–14, 1990. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
9. Holshouser, D. L. and Chandler, J. M. 1988. Management systems for morningglories in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:87.Google Scholar
10. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1991. Influence of MSMA on efficacy of herbicides applied postemergence directed in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:86.Google Scholar
11. Kempen, H. M., Gonzalez, M. P., and Voth, J. 1990. Research in field strategies for ivyleaf morningglory control in California cotton. p. 359–360 in Brown, J. M., ed. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf., Las Vegas, NV. Jan. 9–14, 1990. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
12. King, C. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1990. Morningglory control with lactofen. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:128,Google Scholar
13. Murdock, E. C., Harvey, L. H., and Stapleton, G. S. 1992. Chemical control of cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) in cotton. p. 1300 in Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., ed., Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. Jan. 6–10, 1992. Nashville, TN. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
14. Oakley, S. R., Frans, R. E., and Terhune, M. E. 1983. Studies document yield loss from MSMA applied over-the-top. Ark. Farm Res. 32(2):10.Google Scholar
15. Ridgeway, R. L., Bell, A. A., Veach, J. A., and Chandler, J. M. 1984. Cotton protection practices in the USA and world. p. 265–365 in Kohel, R. J. and Lewis, C. F., eds. Cotton. American Society of Agronomy, Monograph Number 24.Google Scholar
16. Snipes, C. E. and Bryson, C. T. 1991. Interference and postemergence control of hemp sesbania in cotton. Miss. Agric. and For. Exp. Stn. Bull. 976. 8 p.Google Scholar
17. Stapleton, G. S., Murdock, E. C., Poston, D. H., and Toler, J. E. 1991. Control of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:84.Google Scholar