Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:12:30.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Paraquat Plus Prescribed Burning on Eastern Redcedar (Juniperus virginiana)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David M. Engle ,
Jimmy F. Stritzke  and
P. Larry Claypool
David M. Engle
Affiliation:
Dept. Agron, Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Jimmy F. Stritzke
Affiliation:
Dept. Agron, Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
P. Larry Claypool
Affiliation:
Dept. Stat., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Paraquat (1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ion) was evaluated as a pretreatment for eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana L. # IUPVI) before spring burning in tallgrass prairie. Wetting sprays of paraquat at 0.3 g ai/L or 0.6 g/L were applied to crowns of small (0.8 to 1.5 m), medium (1.5 to 2.5 m), and large (2.5 to 5.0 m) eastern redcedar trees in August 1983 and 1984 before prescribed burns in the springs of 1984 and 1985. Paraquat alone at the 0.6 g/L concentration killed about 90% of the crown of small trees but as little as 30% of the crown of large trees. Paraquat pretreatments increased post-fire damage to small- and medium-size trees and partially compensated for light fine fuel loading.

Keywords

Integrated brush managementfireIUPVI
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1988 , pp. 172 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arend, J. L. 1950. Influence of fire and soil on distribution of eastern redcedar in the Ozarks. J. For. 48:129–130.Google Scholar
2. Buehring, N., Santelmann, P. W., and Elwell, E. M. 1971. Responses of eastern redcedar to control procedures. J. Range Manage. 24:378–382.Google Scholar
3. Johnsen, T. N. Jr. 1979. Herbicide control of junipers. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 32:79.Google Scholar
4. Owensby, C. E., Blan, K. R., Easton, B. J., and Russ, O. G. 1973. Evaluation of eastern redcedar infestations in the northern Flint Hills. J. Range Manage. 26:256–260.Google Scholar
5. Pechanec, J. R., and Pickford, G. D. 1937. A weight estimate method for the determination of range or pasture production. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 29:894–904.Google Scholar
6. Rollins, D. 1985. Controlling eastern redcedar with prescribed fire. p. 71–83 in Wittwer, R. W. and Engle, D. M., eds. Proc. Eastern Redcedar in Okla. Conf. Coop. Ext. Serv., Div. Agric., Okla. State Univ. E-849.Google Scholar
7. Scifres, C. J., Hamilton, W. T., Inglis, J. M., and Connor, J. R. 1983. Development of integrated brush management systems (IBMS): Decision-making processes. p. 97–104 in Proc. Brush Manage. Symp., Soc. Range Manage. Denver, CO. Google Scholar
8. Snook, E. C. 1985. Distribution of eastern redcedar on Oklahoma rangelands. p. 45–52 in Wittwer, R. W. and Engle, D. M., eds. Proc. Eastern Redcedar in Okla. Conf. Coop Ext. Serv., Div. Agric., Okla. State Univ. E-849.Google Scholar
9. Stritzke, J. F. 1985. Chemical and mechanical control of eastern redcedar. p. 61–69 in Wittwer, R. W. and Engle, D. M., eds. Proc. Eastern Redcedar in Okla. Conf. Coop Ext. Serv., Div. Agric., Okla. State Univ. E-849.Google Scholar
10. VanHaverbeke, D. F., and Read, R. A. 1976. Genetics of eastern redcedar. USDA For. Serv. Res. Paper WO-32.Google Scholar
11. Wilm, H. G., Costello, D. F., and Klipple, G. E. 1944. Estimating forage yield by the double sampling method. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 36:194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar