Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:42:17.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of pH on Phytotoxicity of Metribuzin and Ethyl-metribuzin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Daniel C. Peek  and
Arnold P. Appleby
Daniel C. Peek
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Arnold P. Appleby
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Sci., Oreg. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of pH on the behavior of metribuzin and ethyl-metribuzin in soil and nutrient solution was studied. Toxicity of both herbicides to oats decreased as soil pH decreased from 8.4 to 4.2 in a sandy loam. Herbicide adsorption increased as soil pH decreased. In nutrient solution, pH did not change the phytotoxicity of either herbicide, indicating that pH primarily influences herbicide availability in soil and not plant uptake.

Keywords

Metribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-oneethyl-metribuzin, 4-amino-6-1,1 -dimethylethyl)-3-(ethylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H) -oneoats, Avena sativa L. ‘Cayuse’ ♯3 AVESABioassayBromus tectorumAVESABROTE
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 636 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bailey, G. W., and White, J. L. 1970. Factors influencing the adsorption and movement of pesticides in soil. Residue Rev. 32:29–92.Google Scholar
2. Bukovac, M. J. 1976. Herbicide entry into plants. p.335–364 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides, Vol. 1, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
3. Chiou, C. T. 1981. Partition coefficient and water solubility in environmental chemistry. p. 117–153 in Saxena, J. and Fisher, F., eds. Hazard assessment of chemicals. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
4. Colbert, F. O., Volk, V. V., and Appleby, A. P. 1975. Sorption of atrazine, terbutryn, and GS-14254 on natural and lime-amended soils. Weed Sci. 23:390–394.Google Scholar
5. Corbin, F. T., Upchurch, R. P., and Selman, F. L. 1971. Influence of pH on the phytotoxicity of herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 19:233–239.Google Scholar
6. Frissel, M. J., and Bolt, G. H. 1962. Interaction between certain ionizable organic compounds (herbicides) and clay minerals. Soil Sci. 94:284–291.Google Scholar
7. Gleichsner, J. A., Brewster, B. D., Spinney, R. L., and Appleby, A. P. 1987. Annual brome control in winter wheat. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Soc. Weed Sci., p. 321–322.Google Scholar
8. Hartwig, N. L. 1974. Soil and soil pH effects on the activity of some triazine herbicides. Agric. Lime Dig. 6:34.Google Scholar
9. Harvey, R. G. 1973. Field comparison of twelve dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 21:512–516.Google Scholar
10. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Effect of soil pH on microbial degradation, adsorption, and mobility of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 24:477–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Effect of pH on metribuzin activity in the soil. Weed Sci. 24:505–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Role of pH on metribuzin dissipation in field soils. Weed Sci. 24:508–511.Google Scholar
13. McGlamery, M. D., and Slife, F. D. 1966. The adsorption and desorption of atrazine as affected by pH, temperature, and concentration. Weeds 14:237–239.Google Scholar
14. Moomaw, R. S., and Martin, A. R. 1978. Interaction of metribuzin and trifluralin with soil type on soybean (Glycine max) growth. Weed Sci. 26:327–331.Google Scholar
15. Parker, C. E., Albro, P. W., Hass, J. R., Abusteit, E. O., Mester, T. C., and Corbin, F. T. 1983. Determination of the pKa values of metribuzin and its metabolites. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., p. 106–107.Google Scholar
16. Richardson, W. G., and Banting, J. D. 1977. The phytotoxicity of various herbicides in two sandy loam soils and the effect of liming. Weed Res. 17:203–207.Google Scholar
17. Robinson, E. L. 1982. The effect of soil pH on metribuzin on five common weeds in no-till crop production. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 13:987–994.Google Scholar
18. Rydrych, D. J. 1985. Ethyl metribuzin for downy brome control in small wheat. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep., p. 315.Google Scholar
19. Schmidt, R. R., and Hoyer, H. 1975. Studies on the biological availability of metribuzin. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzencshultz 7:107–115.Google Scholar
20. Simon, E. W., and Beevers, H. 1952. The effect of pH on the biological activities of weak acids and bases. I. The most usual relationships between pH and activity. New Phytol. 51:163–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Weber, J. B. 1966. Molecular structure and pH effects on the sorption of 13 s-triazine compounds on montmorillonite clay. Am. Mineral. 51:1657–1670.Google Scholar
22. Weber, J. B. 1967. Spectrophotometrically determined ionization constants of 13 alkylamino-s-triazines and the relationship of molecular structure and basicity. Spectrochim. Acta. 23:458–461.Google Scholar
23. Weber, J. B. 1970. Mechanisms of adsorption of s-triazines by clay colloids and factors affecting plant availability. Residue Rev. 32:93–130.Google Scholar
24. Weber, J. B., Weed, S. B., and Ward, T. M. 1969. Adsorption of triazines on soil organic matter. Weed Sci. 17:417–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar