Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:37:17.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Pyrasulfotole Carryover to Peanut and Tobacco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2017

Timothy L. Grey ,
Alexx Diera ,
J. Michael Moore ,
Keith S. Rucker  and
Christopher L. Butts
Timothy L. Grey*
Affiliation:
Professor, Former Graduate Research Assistant, and Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793
Alexx Diera
Affiliation:
Professor, Former Graduate Research Assistant, and Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793
J. Michael Moore
Affiliation:
Professor, Former Graduate Research Assistant, and Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793
Keith S. Rucker
Affiliation:
Research Agronomist, Bayer Crop Science, Tifton, GA 31793
Christopher L. Butts
Affiliation:
Agriculture Engineer, National Peanut Research Laboratory, USDA–ARS, Dawson, GA 39842
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: tgrey@uga.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the southeastern United States, growers often double-crop soft red winter wheat with peanut. In some areas, tobacco is also grown as a rotational crop. Pyrasulfotole is a residual POST-applied herbicide used in winter wheat, but information about its effects on rotational crops is limited. Winter wheat planted in autumn 2014 was treated at Feekes stage 1 or 2 with pyrasulfotole at 300 or 600 g ai ha−1. Wheat was terminated by glyphosate at Feekes stage 3 to 4. Peanut was planted via strip tillage, while tobacco was transplanted into prepared beds after minimal soil disturbance. Peanut exhibited no differences in stand establishment, growth, or yield, and tobacco stand, growth, and biomass yields were not different from the nontreated control for any pyrasulfotole rate or treatment timing.

Keywords

Pyrasulfotolepeanut, Arachis hypogaea L.tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Bioassayherbicide carryoverherbicide persistencerotational crop injury
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , October 2017 , pp. 651 - 657
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Cammy Willett, University of Arkansas.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous (2016) Huskie® herbicide product label. Bayer CropScience online at www.cdms.net/ldat/ld8EU007.pdf. Accessed: January 10, 2017Google Scholar
Braga, O, Whall, JD (2006) Data Evaluation Report on the Terrestrial Field Dissipation of Pyrasulfotole (AE 0317309). PMRA Submission 2006-2445. http://www.archive.epa.gov. Accessed: February 28, 2017Google Scholar
Chandi, A, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Beam, JB (2011) Resistance to acetolactate synthase and acetyl Co-A carboxylase inhibitors in North Carolina Italian ryegrass. Weed Technol 25:659–666 Google Scholar
Flitcroft, I (2015) Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network. Griffin, GA: University of Georgia. http://www.georgiaweather.net. Accessed: February 28, 2017Google Scholar
Fromme, DD, Dotray, PA, Grichar, WJ, Fernandez, CJ (2012) Weed control and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) tolerance to pyrasulfotole plus bromoxynil. Int J Agron 2012:1–10 Google Scholar
Gorsic, M, Baric, K, Galzina, N, Scepanovic, M, Ostojic, Z (2008) Weed control in maize with new herbicide topramezone. Cereal Res Commun 36:1627–1630 Google Scholar
Grey, TL (2007) Utility of residual herbicides in no-till double-crop glyphosate resistant soybean production. Crop Management. doi: 10.1094/CM-2007-0122-01-RS CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, TL, Braxton, LB, Richberg, J (2012) Effect of wheat herbicide carryover on double-crop cotton and soybean. Weed Technol 26:207–212 Google Scholar
Harper, SS (1994) Sorption-desorption and herbicide behavior in soil. Pages 207–225 in Duke SO ed, Reviews of Weed Science. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America Google Scholar
Heap, I (2017) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.org. Accessed: January 9, 2017Google Scholar
Horton, D (2016) Georgia Pest Management Handbook—2015 Commercial Edition. www.ent.uga.edu/pest-management. Accessed: February 22, 2016Google Scholar
Kaune, A, Sliege, R, Lenz, M, Riggerger, R. (2008) Fate of pyrasulfotole in the environment. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer 61:73–86 Google Scholar
Lindell, S, Rosinger, C, Schmitt, M, Strek, H, van Almsick, A, Williams, L (2015) HPPD herbicide-safener combinations as resistance breaking solutions for 21st century agriculture. Pages 219–231 in Maienfisch P & Stevenson TM eds, Discovery and Synthesis of Crop Protection Products. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society Google Scholar
Moore, JM, Bertrand, P, Jones, D, Givan, WD, Sumner, P, Harris, GH, Kightlinger, KD, Rains, GC (2013) Tobacco fertilization and pest control. Pages 67–115 in Georgia Tobacco Grower’s Guide 2013. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Publ CSS-06-13 Service Google Scholar
Moran, GR (2014) 4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase and hydroxymandelate synthase: exemplars of the α-keto acid dependent oxygenases. Arch Biochem Biophys 544:58–68 Google Scholar
Prostko, E (2015) Peanut weed control. Pages 67–68 in 2015 Peanut Update. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service Publ CSS-15-0105 Google Scholar
Rahman, A, Dowsett, CA, Trolove, MR, James, TK (2014) Soil residual activity and plant-back periods for the herbicides saflufenacil and topramezone. New Zealand Plant Protections 67:298–303 Google Scholar
Reddy, SS, Stahlman, PW, Geier, PW, Peterson, DE (2012) Broadleaf weed control and crop safety with premixed pyrasulfotole and bromoxynil in winter wheat. Am J Plant Sci 3:1613–1618 Google Scholar
Reddy, SS, Stahlman, PW, Geier, PW, Thompson, CR, Currie, RS, Schlegel, AJ, Olson, BL, Lally, NG (2013) Weed control and crop safety with premixed pyrasulfotole and bromoxynil in grain sorghum. Weed Technol 27:664–670 Google Scholar
Robinson, MA, Letarte, J, Cowbrough, MJ, Sikkema, PH, Tardif, FJ (2014) Response of underseeded red clover to winter wheat herbicides as affected by application timing. Agriculture Sciences 5:1351–1360 Google Scholar
Schmitte, MH, van Almsick, A, Williams, L (2008) Discovery and chemistry of pyrasulfotole, a new dicot herbicide for cereal production. Pflanzenschutz-Nachr Bayer 61:7–14 Google Scholar
Schulte, W, Köcher, H (2008) The mode of action of pyrasulfotole. Pflanzenschutz-Nachr Bayer 61:29–42 Google Scholar
Senseman, S (2016) Herbicide Mechanism of Action (MOA) Classification. Weed Science Society of America. www.wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/WSSA-Herbicide-MOA-20160911.pdf. Accessed: January 11, 2017Google Scholar
Shaner, DL (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn., Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
[USEPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Pyrasulfotole: Pesticide Fact Sheet PC-000692. www.epa.gov/pesticides/chem. Accessed: January 10, 2017Google Scholar
Vencill, WK, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Soteres, JK, Mallory-Smith, C, Burgos, NR, Johnson, NG, McCelland, MR (2012) Herbicide resistance: toward an understanding of resistance development and the impact of herbicide-resistant crops. Weed Sci 60:2–30 Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2012) Weed survey—southern states: grass crops subsection. Pages 267–288 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society 65th Annual Meeting. Charleston, SC: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Williams, EJ, Drexler, JS (1981) A nondestructive method for determining peanut Arachis hypogaea cultivar Florunner pod maturity. Peanut Sci 8:134–141 Google Scholar