Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:14:08.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness of Herbicides for Control of Common Pokeweed (Phytolacca americana) in Corn and Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

Kelly M. Patches ,
William S. Curran  and
Dwight D. Lingenfelter
Kelly M. Patches*
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, and Extension Weed Scientist, Department of Plant Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
William S. Curran
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, and Extension Weed Scientist, Department of Plant Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Dwight D. Lingenfelter
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, and Extension Weed Scientist, Department of Plant Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: pokeweed@psu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Common pokeweed is a competitive, simple perennial broadleaf weed that produces abundant seed, making it a frequent problem in agronomic crops in Pennsylvania. Traditionally, tillage was used to manage pokeweed; however, the wide-spread adoption of no-till, as well as a decline in the use of diverse crop rotations and soil-residual herbicides, may have allowed pokeweed populations to increase in recent years. The objective of this research was to identify effective herbicides for control of common pokeweed in corn and soybean. Herbicide efficacy experiments were conducted in separate locations from 2011 to 2013 to determine the effectiveness of POST corn and soybean herbicides for control of pokeweed. Glyphosate-resistant corn and soybean varieties were used and several herbicides were evaluated alone and in combination. The results from this work show that glyphosate is an important herbicide for successful control of pokeweed in soybean. When glyphosate was included, 79 to 91% control was achieved, while for treatments not containing glyphosate, control was not greater than 62%. In corn, several non-glyphosate herbicides, including 2,4-D, dicamba, and mesotrione plus atrazine, are options in addition to glyphosate for controlling pokeweed. Most corn treatments provided at least 80% control throughout the season and significantly reduced common pokeweed biomass compared to the nontreated control. In the year after application, pokeweed control was found to be similar to the results from the previous fall in both corn and soybean.

Phytolacca americana es una maleza perenne de hoja ancha que es competitiva y produce abundante semilla, lo que la hace un problema frecuente en cultivos agronómicos en Pennsylvania. Tradicionalmente, la labranza fue usada para manejar P. americana, sin embargo, la amplia adopción de cero labranza, además de la disminución en el uso de rotaciones de cultivos diversas y de herbicidas residuales de suelo, podrían haber permitido que poblaciones de P. americana aumentaran en años recientes. El objetivo de esta investigación fue identificar herbicidas efectivos para el control de P. americana en maíz y soja. En localidades separadas en 2011 y 2013, se realizaron experimentos para determinar la eficacia de herbicidas POST para maíz y soja para el control de P. americana. Variedades de maíz y soja resistentes a glyphosate fueron usadas y se evaluaron varios herbicidas solos o en combinación. Los resultados de este trabajo muestran que glyphosate es un herbicida importante para el control exitoso de P. americana en soja. Cuando se incluyó glyphosate, el control alcanzó 79 a 91%, mientras que con tratamientos que no contenían glyphosate el control no fue mayor a 62%. En maíz, varios herbicidas incluyendo 2,4-D, dicamba, y mesotrione más atrazine, son opciones para el control de P. americana, además de glyphosate. La mayoría de los tratamientos en maíz brindaron al menos 80% de control durante la temporada de crecimiento y redujeron significativamente la biomasa de P. americana al compararse con el testigo sin tratamiento. En el año después de la aplicación, el control de P. americana fue similar a los resultados en el otoño anterior tanto en maíz como en soja.

Keywords

Atrazinedicambamesotrioneglyphosate2,4-Dcommon pokeweed, Phytolacca americana L. PHTAMcorn, Zea mays L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Herbicide efficacyperennial weed control
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 193 - 201
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Current address of first author: Penn State Extension, Chambersburg, PA 17202.

Associate Editor for this paper: Aaron G. Hager, University of Illinois

References

Literature Cited

Baldwin, AE, Khan, MA, Tumer, NE, Goss, DJ, Friedland, DE (2009) Characterization of pokeweed antiviral protein binding to mRNA cap analogs: competition with nucleotides and enhancement by translation initiation factor iso4G. Biochim Biophys Acta, Gene Regul Mech 1789:109–116 Google Scholar
Bernstein, ER, Stoltenberg, DE, Posner, JL, Hedtcke, JL (2014) Weed community dynamics and suppression in tilled and no-tillage transitional organic winter rye–soybean systems. Weed Sci 62:125–137 Google Scholar
Buhler, DD, Stoltenberg, DE, Becker, RL, Gunsolus, JL (1994) Perennial weed populations after 14 years of variable tillage and cropping practices. Weed Sci 42:205–209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, WS, Lingenfelter, DD, Collins, AA, Tooker, JF, Bohnenblust, EW (2015a) Soybean pest management. Pages 295–342 in Penn State 2015-2016 Agronomy Guide. University Park, PA: College of Agricultural Sciences, Pennsylvania State University Google Scholar
Curran, WS, Lingenfelter, DD, Tooker, JF, Collins, AA, Bohnenblust, EW (2015b) Corn pest management. Pages 201–283 in Penn State 2015-2016 Agronomy Guide. University Park, PA: College of Agricultural Sciences, Pennsylvania State University Google Scholar
Domashevskiy, AV, Miyoshi, H, Goss, DJ (2012) Inhibition of pokeweed antiviral protein (PAP) by turnip mosaic virus genome-linked protein (VPg). J Biol Chem 287:29729–29738 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duiker, SW (2013) Soil management. Pages 1–18 in Penn State 2013-2014 Agronomy Guide. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, College of Agricultural Sciences Google Scholar
Duiker, SW, Myers, JC (2002) Better Soils with the No-Till System. Pennsylvania State University. 24 pGoogle Scholar
Glenn, S, Kalnay, PA (2000) Perennial and annual weed control in glyphosate tolerant crops. Page 36 in Proceedings of the 54th Northeastern Weed Science Society. Woodstown, NJ: Northeastern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Glenn, S, Phillips, WH (1994) Perennial weed control in no-tillage corn with postemergence herbicides. Page 71 in Proceedings of the 48th Northeastern Weed Science Society. Woodstown, NJ: Northeastern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Hartley, HO (1950) The maximum F-ratio as a short-cut test for heterogeneity of variance. Biometrika 37:308–312 Google Scholar
Horowitz, J, Ebel, R, Ueda, K (2010) “No-Till” Farming Is a Growing Practice. Economic Information Bulletin 70. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research ServiceGoogle Scholar
Maness, L, Goktepe, I, Hardy, B, Yu, J, Ahmedna, M (2012) Antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of Phytolacca americana extracts and their fractions on breast and colon cancer cells. Res J Med Plant 6:17–26 Google Scholar
Mansouri, S, Kutky, M, Hudak, KA (2012) Pokeweed antiviral protein increases HIV-1 particle infectivity by activating the cellular mitogen activated protein kinase pathway. PLoS One 7:e36369 Google Scholar
Marcelli, M, Glenn, S (1993) Activity of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron on pokeweed. Page 32 in Proceedings of the 47th Northeastern Weed Science Society. Woodstown, NJ: Northeastern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Murphy, SD, Clements, DR, Belaoussoff, S, Kevan, PG, Swanton, CJ (2006) Promotion of weed species diversity and reduction of weed seedbanks with conservation tillage and crop rotation. Weed Sci 54:69–77 Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service [date unknown] Quick Stats 2.0. http://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/. Accessed February 13, 2014Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service (2008) Tillage Practices with Updated Alfalfa Seedings. Harrisburg, PA: US Department of Agriculture Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service (2014) Tillage Practices with Updated Alfalfa Seedings and Final Acreages. Harrisburg, PA: US Department of Agriculture Google Scholar
Nolte, SA, Young, BG, Roskamp, GK (2002) Common pokeweed control in corn and soybean. Page 122 in Proceedings of the 57th North Central Weed Science Society. Westminster, CO: North Central Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Owen, MDK (2008) Weed species shifts in glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Manag Sci 64:377–387 Google Scholar
Patches, KM (2014) Common Pokeweed (Phytolacca americana L.) Management in Pennsylvania Field Crops. MS thesis. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State UniversityGoogle Scholar
Pennsylvania Soybean Promotion Board (2013) Checkpoint Newsletter for Pennsylvania Soybean Producers. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Soybean Promotion Board Google Scholar
VanGessel, MJ (1999) Control of perennial weed species as seedlings with soil-applied herbicides. Weed Technol 13:425–428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, BG, Nolte, SA (2002) Common pokeweed control in corn. Pages 256–257 in Proceedings of the 57th North Central Weed Science Society. Westminster, CO: North Central Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar