Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:35:03.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Celery (Apium graveolens) Root Residue on Growth of Various Crops and Weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Thomas A. Bewick
Affiliation:
Hortic. Sci. Dep., Univ. Florida, Gainesville, 32611
Donn G. Shilling
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Florida, Gainesville, 32611
Joan A. Dusky
Affiliation:
Everglades Res. & Educ. Cent., Univ. Florida, Gainesville, 32611
Deborah Williams
Affiliation:
Univ. Florida, Gainesville, 32611

Abstract

The relative sensitivity of various crops and weeds to celery root residue incorporated into soil was determined in greenhouse experiments. A range of concentrations was used to determine the percentage of celery residue needed to cause a 50% reduction in plant growth (I50). The most sensitive weed was spiny amaranth and the least sensitive was common purslane. The most sensitive crop was radish and the least sensitive was celery. Selectivity was calculated as crop I50/weed I50 and varied from a maximum of 13 for celery and spiny amaranth to a low of 0.4 for radish and common purslane. Selective weed suppression might be obtained when celery residue is present.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alexander, M. 1977. Introduction to Soil Microbiology, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 467 p.Google Scholar
2. Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1986. Allelopathic activity of rye (Secale cereale L.). p. 271286 in Putnam, A. R. and Tang, C. S., eds. The Science of Allelopathy. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
3. Baskin, J. M., Ludlow, C. J., Harris, T. M., and Wolfe, F. T. 1967. Psoralen, an inhibitor in the seeds of Psoralea subacaulis (Leguminoseae) . Phytochemistry 6:1209.Google Scholar
4. Beier, R. C. and Oertli, E. H. 1983. Psoralen and other linear furocoumarins as phytoalexins in celery. Phytochemistry 22:25952597.Google Scholar
5. Beier, R. C., Ivie, G. W., Oertli, E. H., and Holt, D. L. 1983. HPLC analysis of linear furocoumarins (psoralens) in healthy celery (Apium graveolens). Food Chem. Toxicol. 21:163165.Google Scholar
6. Brown, S. A. 1981. Coumarins. p. 286287 in Stumpf, P. K. and Conn, E. E., eds. The Biochemistry of Plant: A Comprehensive Treatise Vol. 7 of E. E. Conn ed. Secondary Plant Products. Academic Press, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
7. Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. p. 4749.Google Scholar
8. Duke, S. O. 1986. Naturally occurring chemical compounds as herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 2:1765.Google Scholar
9. Dusky, J. A., Bewick, T. A., and Shilling, D. G. 1994. Differential growth response of lettuce culitvars to celery root residue. Int. J. Allelopathy. In Press.Google Scholar
10. Fischer, N. H. 1986. The function of mono and sesquiterpenes as plant germination and growth regulators. p. 203218 in Putnam, A. R. and Tang, C., eds. The Science of Allelopathy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
11. Guenzi, W. D., McCalla, T. M., and Norstadt, F. A. 1967. Presence and persistence of phytotoxic substances in wheat, oat, corn, and sorghum residues. Agron. J. 59:163165.Google Scholar
12. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn., Berkeley, CA. Cir. 347. 32 p.Google Scholar
13. Lord, K. M., Epton, H. A. S., and Frost, R. R. 1988. Virus infection and furocoumarins in celery. Plant Pathol. 37:385389.Google Scholar
14. MacLeod, A. J., MacLeod, G., and Subramanian, G. 1988. Volatile aroma constituents of celery. Phytochemistry 27:373375.Google Scholar
15. May, F. E. and Ash, J. E. 1990. An assessment of the allelopathic potential of Eucalyptus . Aust. J. Bot. 38:245254.Google Scholar
16. Patrick, Z. A. 1971. Phytotoxic substances associated with the decomposition in soil of plant residues. Soil Sci. 111:1318.Google Scholar
17. Patrick, Z. A., Toussoun, T. A., and Snyder, W. C. 1963. Phytotoxic substances in arable soils associated with decomposition of plant residues. Phytopathology 53:152161.Google Scholar
18. Patrick, Z. A., Toussoun, T. A., and Koch, L. W. 1964. Effect of crop-residue decomposition products on plant roots. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2:627–292.Google Scholar
19. Putnam, A. R. 1988. Allelochemicals from plants as herbicides. Weed Technol. 2:510518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Putnam, A. R. and Tang, C. 1986. p. 119 in Putnam, A. R. and Tang, C., The Science of Allelopathy. John Wiley & Sons. Inc., New York.Google Scholar
21. Rice, E. L. 1974. p. 322 in Rice, E. L., ed. Allelopathy. Academic Press, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
22. Sherf, A. F. and MacNab, A. A. 1986. Vegetable Diseases and Their Control. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. p. 157201.Google Scholar
23. Shilling, D. G., Dusky, J. A., Mossler, M. A., and Bewick, T. A. 1992. Allelopathic potential of celery residues on lettuce. J. Am. Hortic. Soc. 117:308312.Google Scholar
24. Shilling, D. G., Worsham, A. D., and Danehower, D. A. 1986. Influence of mulch, tillage, and diphenamid on weed control, yield, and quality in no-till flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Weed Sci. 34:738744.Google Scholar
25. Surico, G., Varvaro, L., and Solfrizzo, M. 1987. Linear furocoumarin accumulation in celery plants infected with Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovora . J. Agric. Food Chem. 35:406409.Google Scholar
26. Weston, L. A. and Putnam, A. R. 1986. Adverse impacts of allelopathy in agricultural systems. p. 4356 in Putnam, A. R. and Tang, C., eds. The Science of Allelopathy. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar