Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T23:42:21.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Phosphorus Fertilization on Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) Duration of Interference in Lettuce (Lactuca sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Bielinski M. Santos ,
Joan A. Dusky ,
William M. Stall  and
James P. Gilreath
Bielinski M. Santos*
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 5007 60th St. East, Bradenton, FL 34203
Joan A. Dusky
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611
William M. Stall
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611
James P. Gilreath
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, University of Florida, 5007 60th St. East, Bradenton, FL 34203
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: bmsantos@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were carried out in organic soils to determine the effects of different phosphorus (P) fertilization programs and common lambsquarters duration of interference on lettuce. Phosphorus was either banded (125 kg/ha) or broadcast (250 kg/ha) before lettuce planting. A common lambsquarters population density of four plants per 6 m row interfered with ‘South Bay’ lettuce for 2, 4, 6, or 8 wk after lettuce emergence, along with a weed-free control. For banded P, lettuce fresh weight declined linearly (y = 14.82 − 0.97x; r 2 = 0.96) as duration of common lambsquarters interference increased. The effect of broadcast P over common lambsquarters duration of interference fit a quadratic equation (y = 10.67 − 1.69x + 0.12x2; r 2 = 0.98). The difference in the regression model intercepts for both P fertilization programs showed that in the absence of common lambsquarters interference, marketable lettuce fresh weight was higher by banding P than by broadcasting P. Based on predicted values, this difference is approximately 28% (+4.15 kg per 6 m row) in favor of banded P. Therefore, banding P at 125 kg/ha proved to be beneficial in raising lettuce fresh weight regardless of the duration of interference. For banded P, the model predicts that 10% yield reduction would be observed at 1.53 wk (10.5 d) of common lambsquarters interference. However, with broadcast P, this period declined to 0.67 wk (4.7 d).

Keywords

Common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEALlettuce, Lactuca sativa LCompetitioncultural weed controlintegrated weed managementnutrients
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 152 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alkamper, J. 1976. Influence of weed infestation on effect of fertilizer dressings. Pflanzenschutz-Nachr. Bayer 29:191–235.Google Scholar
Beckett, T. H., Stoller, E. H., and Wax, L. M. 1988. Interference of four annual weeds in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:764–769.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. and Reddy, K. N. 1988. Interference of common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in transplanted tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Weed Technol. 2:505–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conn, J. S. and Thomas, D. L. 1987. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) interference in spring barley. Weed Technol. 1:312–313.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 1995. Approaches for improving crop competitiveness through the manipulation of fertilization strategies. Weed Sci. 43:491–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dusky, J. A. and Stall, W. M. 1988. Evaluation of herbicides for weed control in Florida lettuce production. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc 101:367–370.Google Scholar
Hochmuth, G., Hanlon, E., Nagata, R., Snyder, G., and Schueneman, T. 1994. Crisphead Lettuce: Fertilization Recommendations for Crisphead Lettuce Grown on Organic Soils in Florida. Gainesville, FL: Florida Cooperative Extension Service Bull. SP-153.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. G., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1991. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Malabar, FL: Krieger. 550 p.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. 1989. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, irrigation, and crop genotype on canopy relations and yields of an intercrop/weed mixture. Field Crop Res 22:83–100.Google Scholar
Mitich, L. W. 1988. Common lambsquarters. Weed Technol. 2:550–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody, K. 1981. Weed-Fertilizer Interactions in Rice. Los Baños, Phillipines: International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). International Rice Paper Series No. 68. 35 p.Google Scholar
Morales-Payan, J. P., Santos, B. M., Stall, W. M., and Bewick, T. A. 1998. Influence of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) population densities on bell pepper (Capsicum annuum) yield as affected by nitrogen rates. Weed Technol. 12:230–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales-Payan, J. P., Santos, B. M., Stall, W. M., and Bewick, T. A. 1999. Nitrogen effects on the competitive interactions of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and cilantro (Coriandrum sativum). J. Herbs Spices Medicinal Plants 6:59–66.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, P. E. 1995. Effects of fertilizer and stubble burning on downy brome competition in winter wheat. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal 26:951–960.Google Scholar
Sample, E. C., Soper, R. J., and Racz, G. J. 1980. Reactions of phosphate fertilizers in soils. in Khasawneh, F. E., ed. The Role of Phosphorus in Agriculture. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy. Pp. 263–304.Google Scholar
Sanchez, C. A., Swanson, S., and Porter, P. S. 1990. Banding P to improve fertilizer use efficiency of lettuce. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci 115:581–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, B. M., Dusky, J. A., and Stall, W. M. 2003. Influencia de la fertilización fosforada sobre la interferencia del bledo (Amaranthus hybridus) y la verdolaga (Portulaca oleracea) en lechuga producida en suelos orgánicos. Manejo Integrado Plagas 67:75–78.Google Scholar
Santos, B. M., Dusky, J. A., Stall, W. M., Shilling, D. G., and Bewick, T. A. 1998a. Phosphorus effects on competitive interactions of smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) and common purslane (Portulaca oleracea) with lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Weed Sci. 46:307–312.Google Scholar
Santos, B. M., Morales-Payan, J. P., Dusky, J. A., and Stall, W. M. 1997. Influence of phosphorus fertility regimes and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) densities on lettuce (Lactuca sativa) yields. Caribbean Food Crops Soc. Proc 33:252–255.Google Scholar
Santos, B. M., Morales-Payan, J. P., Stall, W. M., and Bewick, T. A. 1998b. Influence of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) density and nitrogen rate on radish (Raphanus sativus) yield. Weed Sci. 46:661–664.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1243 p.Google Scholar
Schweizer, E. E. 1983. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) interference in sugarbeets (Beta vulgaris). Weed Sci. 31:5–7.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218–227.Google Scholar
Shrefler, J. W., Dusky, J. A., Shilling, D. G., Brecke, B. J., and Sanchez, C. A. 1994. Effects of phosphorus fertility on competition between lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and spiny amaranth (Amaranthus spinosus). Weed Sci. 42. 556–560.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2002. Crop Production—Annual Summary: 2002 Vegetable Crops Summary. Web page: http://www.usda.mannlib.cornell.edu. Accessed: November 10, 2002.Google Scholar