Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:41:10.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Soil-Applied AC 263,222 on Crops Rotated with Soybean (Glycine Max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Marshall B. Wixson  and
David R. Shaw
Marshall B. Wixson
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of the imidazolinone herbicide AC 263,222 on crops that may be rotated with soybean were studied in the greenhouse and field. Corn, grain sorghum, cotton, rice, wheat, soybean, and Italian ryegrass were planted directly into treated soil after AC 263,222 was incorporated. In the field, AC 263,222 at rates as high as 35 g ai ha–1 did not reduce shoot weight or emergence of these species. Some visual injury occurred, but was 20% or less 28 d after planting for all crops. Crops were more sensitive in the greenhouse, where reductions in both shoot and root dry weight were observed. AC 263,222 at 13, 13, and 7 g ha–1 reduced corn, grain sorghum, and Italian ryegrass shoot weights, respectively. Cotton, rice, and wheat tolerated rates from 27 to 55 g ha–1. Biomass reduction occurred with all crops at 55 g ha–1 and above. Because AC 263,222 will be registered for use in soybean at 9 to 18 g ha–1, and potential rotational crops were planted immediately after soil treatment, problems with injury to these crops are not expected.

Keywords

AC 263,222, (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-methyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidItalian ryegrass, Lolium multiflorum L. ‘Marshall’corn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3165’cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. 'Stoneville 213’grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘Topaz’rice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Lemont’soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Terra-Vig 515’wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Magnum’Crop toleranceimidazolinoneGossypium hirsutumLolium multiflorumOryza sativaSorghum bicolorTriticum aestivumZea mays.
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 1992 , pp. 276 - 279
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, R. S., and Barrentine, W. L. 1988. Cotton response following soybean treated with chlorimuron and imazaquin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:97.Google Scholar
2. Barnes, C. J., Goetz, A. J., and Lavy, T. L. 1989. Effects of imazaquin residues on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 37:820–824.Google Scholar
3. Basham, G. W., Lavy, T. L., Oliver, L. R., and Scott, H. D. 1987. Imazaquin persistence in three Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 35:576–582.Google Scholar
4. Brewster, B. D., and Appleby, A. P. 1983. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotational crops to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 31:861–865.Google Scholar
5. Buchholtz, K. P. 1965. Factors influencing oat injury from triazine residues in soil. Weeds 13:362–367.Google Scholar
6. Burnside, O. C., and Wicks, G. A. 1980. Atrazine carryover in soil in a reduced tillage crop production system. Weed Sci. 28:661–666.Google Scholar
7. Fink, R. J., and Fletchall, O. H. 1969. Soybean injury from triazine residues in soil. Weed Sci. 17:35–36.Google Scholar
8. Frank, R. 1966. Atrazine carryover in production sugar beets in southwestern Ontario. Weeds 14:82–85.Google Scholar
9. Helms, R. S., Tripp, T. N., Smith, R. J. Jr., Baldwin, F. L., and Hackworth, M. 1989. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to imazaquin residues in a soybean (Glycine max) and rice rotation. Weed Technol. 3:513–517.Google Scholar
10. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259–267.Google Scholar
11. Mills, J. A., and Witt, W. W. 1989. Efficacy, phytotoxicity, and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in no-till double-crop soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:353–359.Google Scholar
12. Pawlak, J. A., Kells, J. J., Barrett, M., and Meggitt, W. F. 1987. Effect of atrazine residue on soybean growth under three tillage systems and various herbicides. Weed Technol. 1:140–144.Google Scholar
13. Peterson, M. A., and Arnold, W. E. 1986. Response of rotational crops to soil residues of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34:131–136.Google Scholar
14. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity to corn. Weed Sci. 36:78–33.Google Scholar
15. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Response of corn (Zea mays) cultivars to imazaquin, Weed Sci. 36:625–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Leavitt, R. A. 1988. Influence of rate, method of application, and tillage on imazaquin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 36:90–95.Google Scholar
17. Ritter, R. L., Harris, T. C., and Kaufman, L. M. 1988. Chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron residues on double-cropped soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 2:49–52.Google Scholar
18. Shaw, D. R., Smith, C. A., Coats, G. E., Riley, D. G., Mack, R. A., Minton, B. W., Rainero, H. P., and Wesley, R. A. Jr. 1988. Weed control investigations in non-delta soybeans—1987. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Info. Bull 115. 144 p.Google Scholar
19. Shaw, D. R., Cole, A. W., Coats, G. E., Smith, C. A., Holloway, J., Rainero, H. P., Wixson, M. B., Bruff, S. A., and Ratnayake, W.R.A.S. 1989. Weed control investigations in non-delta soybeans, wheat, and pastures—1988. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Info. Bull 143. 110 p.Google Scholar
20. Smith, D. H., and Shaw, D. R. 1988. New imidazolinone herbicides for control of sicklepod in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:299.Google Scholar
21. Stougaard, R. N., Shea, P. J., and Martin, A. R. 1990. Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 38:67–70.Google Scholar
22. Swan, D. G. 1972. Effect of herbicides on alfalfa and subsequent crops. Weed Sci. 20:335–337.Google Scholar
23. Talbert, R. E., and Fletchall, O. H. 1964. Inactivation of simazine and atrazine in the field. Weeds 12:33–37.Google Scholar
24. Wiese, A. F., Wood, M. L., and Chenault, E. W. 1988. Persistence of sulfonylureas in Pullman clay loam. Weed Technol. 2:251–256.Google Scholar
25. Willard, T. S., Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., and Habetz, R. J. 1990. Evaluation of AC 263,222 in soybeans in Louisiana. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:29.Google Scholar
26. Wixson, M. B., and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Weed control and soybean tolerance with AC 263,222. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:60.Google Scholar