Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:19:36.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Evaluating shifts in species distribution following herbicide and fertilizer applications for smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus) control in bahiagrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2024

Nicholas J. Shay
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Crop and Soil Sciences Department, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA
Lisa L. Baxter
Affiliation:
State Forage Extension Specialist, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA
Nicholas T. Basinger
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA
William G. Secor
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Justin C. Burt
Affiliation:
Post-Doctoral Research Associate, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA
Guy A. Hancock
Affiliation:
Public Service Assistant, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793
Brian M. Schwartz
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA
Jason Belcher
Affiliation:
North America Vegetation Management Product Manager, Envu, Auburn, AL.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Novel management strategies for controlling smutgrass have potential to influence sward dynamics in bahiagrass forage systems. This experiment evaluated population shifts in bahiagrass forage following implementation of integrated herbicide and fertilizer management plans for controlling smutgrass. Herbicide treatments included indaziflam applied preemergence (PRE), hexazinone applied postemergence (POST), a combination of PRE + POST herbicides, and a nonsprayed control. Fertilizer treatments included nitrogen (N), nitrogen + potassium (N+K), and an unfertilized control. The POST reduced smutgrass coverage regardless of PRE or fertilizer application by the end of the first season and remained low for the three-year duration of the experiment (P < 0.01). All treatments, including nontreated controls, reduced smutgrass coverage during year 3 (P < 0.05), indicating that routine harvesting to remove the biomass reduced smutgrass coverage. Bahiagrass cover increased at the end of year 1 with POST (P < 0.01) but only the POST + fertilizer treatment maintained greater bahiagrass coverage than the nontreated control by the end of year 3 (P < 0.05). Expenses associated with the POST + fertilizer treatment totaled $348 ha-1 across the three-year experiment. Other smutgrass control options could include complete removal of biomass (hay production) and pasture renovation, which can cost threefold or greater more than POST + fertilizer treatment. Complete removal of biomass may reduce smutgrass coverage by removing mature seedheads, but at a much greater expense of $2,835 to $5,825 ha-1 depending on herbicide and fertilizer inputs. Bahiagrass renovation is $826 ha-1 in establishment costs alone. When pasture production expenses are included for two seasons post-renovation, the total increases to $1,120 ha-1 across three seasons. The importance of hexazinone and fertilizer as components of smutgrass control in bahiagrass forage was confirmed in this study. Future research should focus on the biology of smutgrass and the role of a PRE in a long-term, larger-scale forage system.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America