Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:28:39.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of 2,4-D–based Herbicide Mixtures for Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2018

Benjamin H. Lawrence ,
Jason A. Bond Open the ORCID record for Jason A. Bond [Opens in a new window] ,
Thomas W. Eubank ,
Bobby R. Golden ,
Donald R. Cook  and
Joseph P. Mangialardi
Benjamin H. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Research Associate II, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS, USA
Jason A. Bond*
Affiliation:
Research/Extension Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS, USA
Thomas W. Eubank
Affiliation:
Former Assistant Extension/Research Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS, USA; current: Dow Agrosciences, 9330 Zionsville Road, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Bobby R. Golden
Affiliation:
Associate Research/Extension Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS, USA
Donald R. Cook
Affiliation:
Assistant Research Professor, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology Department, Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS, USA
Joseph P. Mangialardi
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS, USA; current: Nutrien Ag Solutions, 695 Gaines Highway, Boyle, MS 38730
*
Author for correspondence: Jason Bond, Research/Extension Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, P.O. Box 197, Stoneville, MS 38776. (Email: jason.bond@msstate.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding control of glyphosate-resistant (GR) Palmer amaranth with multiple herbicide sites of action, including synthetic auxins, is crucial for growers to minimize GR Palmer amaranth interference with crops. Field studies in 2013 and 2014 and a greenhouse study in 2014 were conducted in Stoneville, MS, to evaluate POST control of GR Palmer amaranth with 2,4-D alone and in mixtures with glyphosate and/or glufosinate. In the greenhouse study, control of 5- and 10-cm GR Palmer amaranth was 87% with 2,4-D at 0.84 kg ae ha−1. Dry weight reduction of GR Palmer amaranth was ≥81% with 2,4-D at 0.84 kg ha−1. In field studies, mixtures of glufosinate at 0.59 kg ai ha−1 and 2,4-D at 0.56 or 1.12 kg ae ha−1 controlled 5- to 10-cm GR Palmer amaranth 87% at 28 d after treatment (DAT). Averaged across glyphosate treatments, glufosinate applied alone applied to 5- to 10-cm GR Palmer amaranth reduced dry weight at 28 DAT to 20 g m−2 from 82 g m−2 and was comparable with that following 2,4-D applied alone at 1.12 kg ae ha−1 and mixtures of glufosinate plus 2,4-D at 0.56 and 1.12 kg ae ha−1. Mixtures of 2,4-D plus glufosinate provided ≥92% control of 15- to 20-cm GR Palmer amaranth at 28 DAT. When applied to 15- to 20-cm plants, mixtures of 2,4-D plus glufosinate reduced GR Palmer amaranth density to ≤5 plants m−2 compared with 65 plants m−2 where no 2,4-D or glufosinate was applied. Glufosinate and 2,4-D are viable control options for 5- to 10-cm or 15- to 20-cm GR Palmer amaranth. However, 2,4-D did not improve GR Palmer amaranth control when added to any herbicide mixture except glyphosate and glufosinate applied to 15- to 20-cm plants at the 28 DAT evaluation.

Keywords

David Johnson, Pioneer/DuPontr2,4-DglyphosateglufosinatePalmer amaranth Amaranthus palmeri (S.) Watson AMAPAGreenhouseherbicide interactionsherbicide rate
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 263 - 271
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (2014a) 2,4-D Amine herbicide label. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld4JF000.pdf. Accessed: April 9, 2015Google Scholar
Anonymous (2014b) Roundup PowerMax® herbicide label. http://www.monsanto.com/products/documents/msds-labels/roundup_powermax_label.pdf. Accessed: February 22, 2014Google Scholar
Anonymous (2015) Liberty herbicide label. http://www.cropscience.bayer.com. Accessed: February 8, 2018Google Scholar
Anonymous (2017a) EnlistTM Duo herbicide label. https://dasus.my.salesforce.com/sfc/p. Accessed: February 15, 2018Google Scholar
Anonymous (2017b) EnlistTM One herbicide label. https://dasus.my.salesforce.com/sfc/p/#40000000Mo2J/a/0b000000XaoN/nL1BEWKgHNAc0R6Q7IqTBpC.s2KYwjKrJ37wNiBo3F8. Accessed: February 15, 2018Google Scholar
Anonymous (2018) EnlistTM weed control systems tested tank-mix products. http://www.enlist.com/en/approved-tank-mixes. Accessed: February 15, 2018Google Scholar
Barnett, KA, Mueller, TC, Steckel, KL (2013) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) control with glufosinate or fomesafen combined with growth regulator herbicides. Weed Technol 27:454–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2011) On the analysis of combined experiments. Weed Technol 25:165–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahal, GS, Johnson, GJ (2012) Influence of glyphosate or glufosinate in combinations with growth regulator herbicides and other agrochemicals in controlling glyphosate-resistant weeds. Weed Technol 26:638–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzer, E, Al-Khatib, K (2001) Photosynthetic inhibition and ammonium accumulation in Palmer amaranth after glufosinate application. Weed Sci 49:454–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzer, E, Al-Khatib, K, Peterson, DE (2002) Glufosinate efficacy on Amaranthus species in glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 16:326–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craigmyle, BD, Ellis, EM, Bradley, KW (2013) Influence of weed height and glufosinate plus 2,4-D combinations on weed control in soybean with resistance to 2,4-D. Weed Technol 27:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Vencill, WK, Kichler, JM, Webster, TM, Brown, SM, York, AC, Davis, JW, Hanna, WW (2006) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 54:620–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM, York, AL (2010) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in the United States. Page 207 in Nandula VK, ed. Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Other Weeds: History Development and Management. Hoboken, NJ: WileyGoogle Scholar
Dario, L (2015) USDA Deregulates Monsanto’s Next-Generation Weed Control Trait Technology. http://news.monsanto.com/press-release/usda-deregulates-monsantos-next-generation-weed-control-trait-technology. Accessed: April 30, 2015Google Scholar
Dillon, TW, Scott, RC, Dickson, JW, Pearrow, ND (2011) Glyphosate-resistant pigweed control in soybean. Page 232 in Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Southern Weed Science Society. Las Cruces, NM: Southern Weed Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Edwards, CB (2013) Postemergence and Residual Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) with Dicamba. Master’s thesis. Starkville, MS: Mississippi State University. 30 pGoogle Scholar
[EPA] Environmental Protection Agency (2005) 2,4-D Red Facts Pesticide Registration. http://www.epa.gov. Accessed: August 11, 2013Google Scholar
Franz, JE, Mao, MK, Sikorski, JA (1997) Glyphosate: a unique global pesticide. Page 68 in Nandula VK, ed. Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Other Weeds: History, Development, and Management. Hoboken, NJ: WileyGoogle Scholar
Gossett, BJ, Murdock, EC, Toler, JE (1992) Resistance of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to the dinitroaniline herbicide. Weed Technol 6:587–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, JM (2010) Auxin herbicides: current status of mechanisms and modes of action. Pest Manag Sci 66:113–120Google Scholar
Hager, AG (2014) Management of Palmer amaranth in Illinois. Urbana, IL: Department of Crop Sciences, University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
Heap, IM (2018) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/in.asp. Accessed: January 29, 2018Google Scholar
Hydrick, HT (2017) Evaluation of Foliar Fertilizer or Cytokinin Mixtures in Combination with Common Postemergence Soybean Herbicides. Master’s thesis. Starkville, MS: Mississippi State University. 36 pGoogle Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Sandell, LD, Rena, N, Kruger, GR, Knezevic, SZ (2014) Confirmation and control of triazine and 4-hydroxphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibiting herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Nebraska. Weed Technol 28:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, WG, Hallet, SG, Legleiter, TR, Whitford, F, Weller, SC, Bordelon, BP, Lerner, BR (2012) 2,4-D and Dicamba-Tolerant Crops—Some Things to Consider. Purdue Extension http://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/id/id-453-w.pdf. Accessed: August 15, 2013Google Scholar
Manderscheid, R, Wild, A (1986) Studies on the mechanism of inhibition of phosphinothricin of glutamine synthetase isolated from Triticum aestivum. Plant Physiol 123:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manuchehri, MR, Peter, AD, Keeling, JW (2017) EnlistTM weed control systems for Palmer amaranth management in Texas high plains cotton. Weed Technol 6:793–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, RM, Sosnoskie, LM, Culpepper, SA, Steckel, LE, York, AC, Braxton, LB, Ford, JC (2013) Weed response to 2,4-D, 2,4-DB, and dicamba applied alone or with glufosinate. J Cotton Sci 17:212–218Google Scholar
Miller, MR, Norsworthy, JK (2016) Evaluation of herbicide programs for use in a 2,4-D-resistant soybean technology for control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Technol 30:366–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithila, J, Hall, JC, Johnson, WG, Kelly, KB, Riechers, DE (2011) Evolution of resistance to auxin herbicides: historical perspectives, mechanisms of resistance, and implications for broadleaf weed management in agronomic crops. Weed Sci 59:445–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandula, VK (2010) Herbicide resistance: definitions and concepts. Page 35 in Nandula VK, ed. Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Other Weeds: History, Development, and Management. Hoboken, NJ: WileyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, RA, Burgos, NR, Tranel, PJ, Singh, S, Glasgow, L, Scott, RC, Nichols, RL (2016) Resistance to PPO-inhibiting herbicide in Palmer amaranth from Arkansas. Pest Manag Sci 75:864–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, H, Wild, A, Ruhle, W (1987) The effect of phosphinothricin (glufosinate) on photosynthesis II. The causes of inhibition of photosynthesis. Z Naturforsch 42C:270–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxton, AM (1998) A macro for converting mean separation output to letter grouping in ProcMixed. Pages 1243–1246 in Proceedings of the 23rd SAS users Group International. Cary, NC: SAS InstituteGoogle Scholar
Schönbrunn, E, Eschenburg, S, Shuttleworth, WA, Schloss, JV, Amrhein, N, Evans, JNS, Kabsch, W (2001) Interaction of the herbicide glyphosate with its target enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate acid 3-phosphate synthase in atomic detail. Proceedings of the NASUSA 98:1376–1380. Page 120 in Nandula VK, ed. Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Other Weeds: History, Development, and Management. Hoboken, NJ: WileyGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL, ed (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp 16–19Google Scholar
Simpson, DM, Thompson, G, Ellis, J, Peterson, MA, Walton, LW (2014) EnlistTM soybean tolerance and weed control with PRE followed by POST herbicide programs. Page 194 in Proceedings of 67th Annual Meeting of the Southern Weed Science Society. Birmingham, AL: Southern Weed Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Sprague, CL, Stoller, EW, Maxx, LM, Horak, MJ (1997) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to selected ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci 45:192–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinruken, H, Amrhein, N (1980) The herbicide glyphosate is potent inhibitor of 5-enolpyruvylshikimic acid-3-phosphate synthase. BBRC 94:1207–1212. Page 120 in Nandula VK, ed. Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Other Weeds: History, Development, and Management. Hoboken, NJ: WileyGoogle Scholar
Thompson, CR, Peterson, D, Lally, NG (2012) Characterization of HPPD Resistant Palmer Amaranth. http://wssaabstracts.com/public/9/abstract-413.html. Accessed: August 11, 2013Google Scholar
Ward, SM, Webster, TM, Steckel, LE (2013) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): a review. Weed Technol 27:12–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Went, FW (1926) Growth accelerated substances in coleoptile of (Avena sativa). Proc K Akad Wet Amsterdam 30:10–19Google Scholar
Whitaker, JR, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Culpepper, AS (2010) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in soybean with glyphosate and conventional herbicide systems. Weed Technol 24:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wild, A, Manderscheid, R (1984) The effect of phosphinothricin on the assimilation of ammonia in plants. Z Naturforsch 39C:500–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, A, Prostko, E, Culpepper, S, Murphy, T, McCullogh, P (2009) Herbicide Brand Names, Active Ingredients, Chemical Families, and Modes of Action. University of Georgia. http://www.gaweed.com/Herbicide_Modes_of_Action.pdf. Accessed: November 14, 2013Google Scholar