Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:46:41.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Florpyrauxifen-benzyl on Herbicide-Resistant and Herbicide-Susceptible Barnyardgrass Accessions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

M. Ryan Miller ,
Jason K. Norsworthy  and
Robert C. Scott
M. Ryan Miller*
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Research Assistant, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Jason K. Norsworthy
Affiliation:
Professor and Elms Farming Chair of Weed Science, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Robert C. Scott
Affiliation:
Professor, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service, Lonoke, AR, USA
*
Author for correspondence: M. Ryan Miller, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704. (Email: mrm032@uark.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Florpyrauxifen-benzyl is a new herbicide under development in rice that will provide an alternative mode of action to control barnyardgrass. Multiple greenhouse experiments evaluated florpyrauxifen-benzyl efficacy on barnyardgrass accessions collected in rice fields across Arkansas, and to evaluate its efficacy on herbicide-resistant biotypes. In one experiment, florpyrauxifen-benzyl was applied at the labeled rate of 30 g ai ha−1 to 152 barnyardgrass accessions collected from 21 Arkansas counties. Florpyrauxifen-benzyl at 30 g ai ha−1 effectively controlled barnyardgrass and subsequently reduced plant height and aboveground biomass. In a dose-response experiment, susceptible-, acetolactate synthase (ALS)-, propanil-, and quinclorac-resistant barnyardgrass biotypes were subjected to nine rates of florpyrauxifen-benzyl ranging from 0 to 120 g ai ha−1. The effective dose required to provide 90% control, plant height reduction, and biomass reduction of the susceptible and resistant biotypes fell below the anticipated labeled rate of 30 g ai ha−1. Based on these results, quinclorac-resistant barnyardgrass as well as other resistant biotypes can be controlled with florpyrauxifen-benzyl at 30 g ai ha−1. Overall, results from these studies indicate that florpyrauxifen-benzyl can be an effective tool for controlling susceptible and currently existing herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass biotypes in rice. Additionally, the unique auxin chemistry of florpyrauxifen-benzyl will introduce an alternative mechanism of action in rice weed control thus acting as an herbicide-resistance management tool.

Keywords

Jason Bond, Mississippi State UniversityFlorpyrauxifen-benzylbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.rice, Oryza sativa L.Dose responseherbicide resistanceRinskor™ activeweed control
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 126 - 134
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bagavathiannan, MV, Norsworthy, JK, Smith, KL, Neve, P (2012) Seed production of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in response to time of emergence in cotton and rice. J Agric Sci 150:171–724 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, SCH (1983) Crop mimicry in weeds. Econ Bot 37:255–282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, DM, Watts, DS (1988) Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 365 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, JL, Schmitzer, PR, Weimer, MR, Napier, RM, Prusinska, JM (2015) Mode-of-action analysis of a new arylpicolinate herbicide from Dow AgroSciences. Abstract 290 in Proceedings of the Weed Science Society of America Annual Meeting. Lexington, KY: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Bryson, CT, DeFelice, MS (2009) Weeds of the South. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press. 373 pGoogle Scholar
Epp, JB, Alexander, AL, Balko, TW, Buysse, AM, Brewster, WK, Bryan, K, Daeuble, JF, Fields, SC, Gast, RE, Green, RA, Irvine, NM, Lo, WC, Lowe, CT, Renga, JM, Richburg, JS, Ruiz, JM, Satchivi, NM, Schmitzer, PR, Siddall, TL, Webster, JD, Weimer, MR, Whiteker, GT, Yerkes, CN (2016) The discovery of ArlyexTM active and RinskorTM active: two novel auxin herbicides. J Bioorganic and Medicinal Chem 24:362–437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gang, L, Wu, S, Cai, L, Wang, Q, Zhao, X, Wu, C (2013) Identification and mRNA expression profile of glutamate receptor-like gene in quinclorac-resistant and susceptible Echinochloa crus-galli . Gene 531:449–495 Google Scholar
Grossman, K (2009) Auxin herbicides: current status of mechanism and site of action. Pest Manag Sci 66:113–120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardke, JT (2014) Arkansas Rice Production Handbook. University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service. Pp 53–62 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2016) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed August 19, 2016Google Scholar
Holm, LG, Plucknett, DL, Pancho, JW, Herberger, JP (1997) The World’s Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: University Press Hawaii. 609 pGoogle Scholar
Jesche, P (2015a) Progress of modern agricultural chemistry and future prospects. Pest Manag Sci. doi: 10.1002/ps.4190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesche, P (2015b) Propesticides and their use as agrochemicals. Pest Manag Sci. doi: 10.1002/ps.4170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovelace, M, Talbert, RE, Skulman, BW, Scherder, EF (2002) Evaluation of physiological responses in quinclorac-resistant and -susceptible barnyardgrass. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 55:114 Google Scholar
Matzenbacher, FO, Bortoly, ED, Kalsing, A, Merotto, A (2015) Distribution and analysis of the mechanisms of resistance of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) to imidazolinone and quinclorac herbicides. J Agri Sci 153:1044–1058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitich, LW (1990) Barnyardgrass. Weed Technol 4:918–920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Bond, J, Scott, RC (2013) Weed management practices and needs in Arkansas and Mississippi rice. Weed Technol 27:623–630 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC, Johnson, DB (2012b) A six-year summary of the herbicide-resistance weed screening program in rice at the University of Arkansas: 2006–2012. BR Wells Rice Research Studies 609:153–158 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Scott, R, Smith, K, Still, J, Estorninos, LE Jr, Bangarwa, S (2009) Confirmation and management of clomazone-resistant barnyardgrass in rice. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 62:210 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012a) Reducing the risks of herbicide-resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60 (Sp I): 31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seefeldt, SS, Jensen, JE, Fuerst, EP (1995) Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol 9:218–227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, MJ, Norsworthy, JK, Johnson, DB, Scott, RC, DeVore, JD (2011) Response of an Arkansas barnyardgrass population to ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 64:25 Google Scholar
Wilson, MJ, Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC, Gbur, EE (2014) Program approaches to control herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in midsouthern United States rice. Weed Technol 28:39–46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar