Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:35:03.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Harvest-Aid Herbicides as Desiccants in Lentil Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ti Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5A8
Eric N. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5A8
Christian J. Willenborg*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 5A8
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: chris.willenborg@usask.ca

Abstract

Desiccants are currently used to improve lentil dry-down prior to harvest. Applying desiccants at growth stages prior to maturity may result in reduced crop yield and quality, and leave unacceptable herbicide residues in seeds. There is little information on whether various herbicides applied alone or as a tank-mix with glyphosate have an effect on glyphosate residues in harvested seed. Field trials were conducted at Saskatoon and Scott, Saskatchewan, Canada, from 2012 to 2014 to determine whether additional desiccants applied alone or tank mixed with glyphosate improve crop desiccation and reduce the potential for unacceptable glyphosate residue in seed. Glufosinate and diquat tank mixed with glyphosate were the most consistent desiccants, providing optimal crop dry-down and a general reduction in glyphosate seed residues without adverse effects on seed yield and weight. Saflufenacil provided good crop desiccation without yield loss, but failed to reduce glyphosate seed residues consistently. Pyraflufen-ethyl and flumioxazin applied alone or tank mixed with glyphosate were found to be inferior options for growers as they exhibited slow and incomplete crop desiccation, and did not decrease glyphosate seed residues. Based on results from this study, growers should apply glufosinate or diquat with preharvest glyphosate to maximize crop and weed desiccation, and minimize glyphosate seed residues.

Los desecantes son actualmente usados para mejorar el secado de plantas de lenteja antes de la cosecha. Sin embargo, el aplicar desecantes en estadios de desarrollo anteriores a la madurez podría resultar en reducciones en el rendimiento y calidad del cultivo, y en residuos de herbicidas a niveles inaceptables en las semillas. Existe poca información acerca de si varios herbicidas aplicados solos o en mezclas en tanque con glyphosate tienen un efecto sobre los residuos de glyphosate en la semilla cosechada. Se realizaron experimentos de campo en Saskatoon y Scott, Saskatchewan, Canada, desde 2012 a 2014, para determinar si desecantes adicionales aplicados solos o en mezclas en tanque con glyphosate mejoran el secado del cultivo y reducen los residuos de glyphosate potencialmente inaceptables en la semilla. Glufosinate y diquat mezclados en tanque con glyphosate fueron los desecantes más consistentes, brindando un secado óptimo del cultivo y una reducción general en los residuos de glyphosate en la semilla sin tener efectos adversos sobre el rendimiento y peso de la semilla. Saflufenacil brindó un secado del cultivo bueno sin tener pérdidas de rendimiento, pero falló consistentemente en reducir los residuos de glyphosate en la semilla. Se encontró que pyraflufen-ethyl y flumioxazin aplicados solos o mezclados en tanque con glyphosate fueron opciones inferiores para los productores, ya que exhibieron un secado del cultivo lento e incompleto, y no disminuyeron los residuos de glyphosate en la semilla. Con base en los resultados de este estudio, los productores deberían aplicar glufosinate o diquat con glyphosate en pre-cosecha para maximizar el secado del cultivo y las malezas, y así minimizar los residuos de glyphosate en la semilla.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Darren Robinson, University of Guelph.

References

Literature Cited

Ashigh, J, Hall, JC (2010) Basis for interactions between saflufenacil and glyphosate in plants. J Agric Food Chem 58: 73357343 Google Scholar
Azlin, WR, McWhorter, CG (1981) Preharvest effects of applying glyphosate to soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 29: 123127 Google Scholar
Baylis, AD (2000) Why glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, weaknesses and prospects. Pest Manag Sci 56: 299308 Google Scholar
Bethke, RK, Molin, WT, Sprague, C, Penner, D (2013) Evaluation of the interaction between glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Sci 61: 4147 Google Scholar
Bennett, AC, Shaw, DR (2000) Effect of preharvest desiccants on Group IV Glycine max seed viability. Weed Sci 48: 426430 Google Scholar
Boudreaux, JM, Griffin, JL (2011) Application timing of harvest aid herbicides affects soybean harvest and yield. Weed Technol 25: 3843 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant Christie Inc. (2015) Global MRL Database. https://www.globalmrl.com/home. Accessed January 14, 2015.Google Scholar
Cerkauskas, RF, Dhingra, OD, Sinclair, JB, Foor, SR (1982) Effect of three desiccant herbicides on soybean (Glycine max) seed quality. Weed Sci 30: 484490 Google Scholar
Cessna, AJ, Darwent, AL, Kirkland, KJ, Townley-Smith, L, Harker, KN, Lefkovitch, LP (1994) Residues of glyphosate and its metabolite AMPA in wheat seed and foliage following preharvest applications. Can J Plant Sci 74: 653661 Google Scholar
Cessna, AJ, Darwent, AL, Townley-Smith, L, Harker, KN, Kirkland, KJ (2000) Residues of glyphosate and its metabolite AMPA in canola seed following preharvest application. Can J Plant Sci 80: 425431 Google Scholar
Cessna, AJ, Darwent, AL, Townley-Smith, L., Harker, KN, Kirkland, K (2002) Residues of glyphosate and its metabolite AMPA in field pea, barley and flax seed following preharvest applications. Can J Plant Sci 82: 485489 Google Scholar
Cobb, AH, Reade, JPH (2010) Herbicides and Plant Physiology. 2nd edn. London: Wiley-Blackwell. Pp 100185 Google Scholar
Duke, SO, Powles, SB (2008) Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide. Pest Manag Sci 64: 319325 Google Scholar
Ellis, JM, Shaw, DR, Barrentine, WL (1998) Herbicide combinations for preharvest weed desiccation in early maturing soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 12: 157165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[FAOSTAT] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division (2015) Crop Production. http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E. Accessed June 20, 2015Google Scholar
Griffin, JL, Boudreaux, JM, Miller, DK (2010) Herbicides as harvest aids. Weed Sci 58: 355358 Google Scholar
Grossmann, K, Hutzler, J, Caspar, G, Kwiatkowski, J, Brommer, CL (2011) Saflufenacil (KixorTM): biokinetic properties and mechanism of selectivity of a new protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase inhibiting herbicide. Weed Sci 59: 290298 Google Scholar
Ivany, JA (2005) Response of three potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars to pyraflufen-ethyl used as a desiccant in Canada. Crop Prot 24: 836841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeger, MJ, Viljanen-Rollinson, SLH (2001) The use of the area under the disease-progress curve (AUDPC) to assess quantitative disease resistance in crop cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 102: 3240 Google Scholar
McNaughton, KE, Blackshaw, RE, Waddell, KA, Gulden, RH, Sikkema, PH, Gillard, CL (2015) Effect of five desiccants applied alone and in combination with glyphosate in dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Can J Plant Sci 95: 12351242 Google Scholar
Pratt, S (2011) EU Rejects Lentils for Glyphosate Residue. http://www.producer.com/2011/04/eu-rejects-lentils-for-glyphosate-residue/. Accessed February 4, 2015Google Scholar
Ratnayake, S, Shaw, DR (1992) Effects of harvest-aid herbicides on soybean (Glycine max) seed yield and quality. Weed Technol 6: 339344 Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture (2014) Guide to Crop Protection. http://www.agriculture.gov.sk.ca/Default.aspx?DN=5be29ef9-e80c-4ebd-b41d-d8e508b5aaba. Accessed November 10, 2014Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Pulse Growers (2011) Lentil Production Manual. http://www.saskpulse.com/uploads/content/11209_FINAl_Lentil_Manual.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2012Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Pulse Growers (2016) Growing Lentils: Harvest and Storage. http://saskpulse.com/growing/lentils/harvest-and-storage. Accessed February 18, 2016Google Scholar
Schemenauer, I (2011) Desiccation and Pre-Harvest Glyphosate. http://www.agriculture.gov.sk.ca/agv1109_pg_4. Accessed March 12, 2014Google Scholar
Simko, I, Piepho, HP (2012). The area under the disease progress stairs: calculation, advantage, and application. Phytopathology 102: 381389 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Blackshaw, RE, Gulden, RH, Gillard, CL, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2013) Desiccation in dry edible beans with various herbicides. Can J Plant Sci 93: 871877 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Bowley, S, Sikkema, PH (2005) Responses of dry beans to flumioxazin. Weed Technol 19: 351358 Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2010) Sensitivity of leguminous crops to saflufenacil. Weed Technol 24: 143146 Google Scholar
Statistics Canada (2015) Field and Special Crops. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/prim11b-eng.htm. Accessed June 20, 2015Google Scholar
Wehtje, G, Altland, JE, Gilliam, CH (2008) Interaction of glyphosate and diquat in ready-to-use weed control products. Weed Technol 22: 472476 Google Scholar
Whigham, DK, Stoller, EW (1979) Soybean desiccation by paraquat, glyphosate, and ametryn to accelerate harvest. Agronomy J 71: 630633 Google Scholar
Wilson, RG, Smith, JA (2002) Influence of harvest-aid herbicides on dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) desiccation, seed yield, and quality. Weed Technol 16: 109115 Google Scholar