Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:55:30.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Three Winter Cereals for Weed Control in Conservation-Tillage Nontransgenic Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

D. Wayne Reeves ,
Andrew J. Price  and
Michael G. Patterson
D. Wayne Reeves
Affiliation:
J. Phil Campbell, Sr.—Natural Resource Conservation Center, 1420 Experiment Station Road, Watkinsville, GA 30677
Andrew J. Price*
Affiliation:
National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, Agriculture Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 411 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL 36832
Michael G. Patterson
Affiliation:
Agronomy and Soils Department, Auburn University, 202 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36830
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: aprice@ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The increased use of conservation tillage in cotton production requires that information be developed on the role of cover crops in weed control. Field experiments were conducted from fall 1994 through fall 1997 in Alabama to evaluate three winter cereal cover crops in a high-residue, conservation-tillage, nontransgenic cotton production system. Black oat, rye, and wheat were evaluated for their weed-suppressive characteristics compared to a winter fallow system. Three herbicide systems were used: no herbicide, preemergence (PRE) herbicides alone, and PRE plus postemergence (POST) herbicides. The PRE system consisted of pendimethalin at 1.12 kg ai/ha plus fluometuron at 1.7 kg ai/ha. The PRE plus POST system contained an additional application of fluometuron at 1.12 kg/ha plus DSMA at 1.7 kg ai/ha early POST directed (PDS) and lactofen at 0.2 kg ai/ha plus cyanazine at 0.84 kg ai/ha late PDS. No cover crop was effective in controlling weeds without a herbicide. However, when black oat or rye was used with PRE herbicides, weed control was similar to the PRE plus POST system. Rye and black oat provided more effective weed control than wheat in conservation-tillage cotton. The winter fallow, PRE plus POST input system yielded significantly less cotton in 2 of 3 yr compared to systems that included a winter cover crop. Use of black oat or rye cover crops has the potential to increase cotton productivity and reduce herbicide inputs for nontransgenic cotton grown in the Southeast.

Keywords

Black oat, Avena strigosa Schreb. ‘SoilSaver’rye, Secale cereale L. ‘Elbon’wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Pioneer P26 J61’cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Deltapine DP 5690’, ‘Deltapine NuCotn 35B’Allelopathycover cropsDAP, days after plantingPDS, postemergence-directed sprayPOST, postemergencePRE, preemergence
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 731 - 736
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Akemo, M. C., Regnier, E. E., and Bennett, M. A. 2000. Weed suppression in spring-sown rye (Secale cereale)–pea (Pisum sativum) cover crop mixes. Weed Technol. 14:545–549.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002. USDA-NASS. Web page: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/other/pcu-bb/agcs0502.pdf. Accessed: May 5, 2004.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2003. Conservation Tillage Study Prepared for The Cotton Foundation, December 2002, by Doane Marketing Research, St. Louis, MO. Web page: http://www.cotton.org/news/2003/tillage-survey.cfm. Accessed: June 5, 2004.Google Scholar
Ashford, D. L. and Reeves, D. W. 2003. Use of a mechanical roller-crimper as an alternative kill method for cover crops. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 18:37–45.Google Scholar
Bauer, P. J. and Reeves, D. W. 1999. A comparison of winter cereal species and planting dates as residue cover for cotton grown with conservation tillage. Crop Sci. 39:1824–1830.Google Scholar
Blevins, R. L., Cook, D., Phillips, S. H., and Phillips, R. E. 1971. Influence of no-tillage on soil moisture. Agron. J. 63:593–596.Google Scholar
Bradley, J. F. 1995. Success with no-till cotton. in McClelland, M. R., Valco, T. D., and Frans, R. E., eds. Conservation-Tillage Systems for Cotton. Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Rep. 160. Pp. 31–33.Google Scholar
Chase, W. R., Muraleedharan, G. N., and Putnam, A. R. 1991. 2,2′-oxo-1,1′-azobenzene: selective toxicity of rye (Secale cereale L.) allelochemicals to weed and crop species: II. Chem. Ecol. 17:9–19.Google Scholar
Derpsch, R. 1985. Guia de Plantas para Adubação Verde de Inverno. Documentos IAPAR No. 9 (May 1985). Londrina, Paraná: Instituto Agronômico do Paraná (IAPAR), Secretaria da Agricultura e do Abastecimento. 96 p.Google Scholar
Derpsch, R. 1990. Do crop rotation and green manuring have a place in the wheat farming systems of the warmer areas?. in Saunders, D. A., ed. Wheat for the Nontraditional Warm Areas. Proceedings of an International Conference, 29 June–3 August 1990, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT. Pp. 284–299.Google Scholar
Derpsch, R., Roth, C. H., Sidiras, N., and Köpke, U. 1991. Controle da erosão no Paraná, Brazil: Sistemas de cobertura do solo, plantio directo e prepare conservacionista do solo. GmbH, Eschborn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ).Google Scholar
Jost, P., Brown, S., Culpepper, S., Harris, G., Kemerait, B., Roberts, P., Shurley, D., and Williams, J. 2004. Conservation tillage. in Jost, P., ed. 2004 Georgia Cotton Production Guide. University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service. Web page: http://www.griffin.uga.edu/caes/cotton/2004guide/conservationtillage.pdf. Accessed: November 1, 2004.Google Scholar
Kaspar, T. C., Radke, J. K., and Laflen, J. M. 2001. Small grain cover crops and wheel traffic effects on infiltration, runoff, and erosion. J. Soil Water Conserv. 56:160–164.Google Scholar
McCarty, W. H., Blaine, A., and Byrd, J. D. 2003. Cotton no-till production. Mississippi State University Cooperative Extension Service Publ. P1695.Google Scholar
Monks, C. D. and Patterson, M. G. 1996. Conservation Tillage Cotton Production Guide. Alabama Cooperative Extension System Publ. ANR-952.Google Scholar
Nagabhushana, G. G., Worsham, A. D., and Yenish, J. P. 2001. Allelopathic cover crops to reduce herbicide use in sustainable agriculture systems. Allelopathy J. 8:133–146.Google Scholar
Perez, J. F. and Ormeno-Nunez, J. 1991. Difference in hydroxamic acid content in roots and root exudates of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and rye (Secale cereale L.) possible role in allelopathy. Chem. Ecol. 17:1037–1043.Google Scholar
Phatak, S. C. 1998. Managing pests with cover crops. in Shirley, C., Bowman, G., and Cramer, C., eds. Managing Cover Crops Profitably. Burlington, VT: Sustainable Agriculture. Pp. 25–33.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. E., Blevins, R. L., Thomas, G. W., Frye, W. W., and Phillips, S. H. 1980. No-tillage agriculture. Science 208:1108–1113.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. 2003. Impact of rye cover crop and herbicides on weeds, yield, and net return in narrow-row transgenic and conventional soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:28–35.Google Scholar
Reeves, D. W. 1994. Cover crops and rotations. in Hatfield, J. L. and Stewart, B. A., eds. Advances in Soil Science: Crops Residue Management. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis. Pp. 125–172.Google Scholar
Reeves, D. W. 1997. The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems. Soil Tillage Res. 43:131–167.Google Scholar
Reeves, D. W. 2003. A Brasilian model for no-tillage cotton production adapted to the southeastern USA. Proceedings of the II World Congress on Conservation Agriculture—Producing in Harmony with Nature, August 11–15, 2003. Iguassu Falls, Paraná, Brazil. Pp. 372–374.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1028 p.Google Scholar
Truman, C. C., Reeves, D. W., Shaw, J. N., and Burmester, C. H. 2002. Soil management effects on intertill erodibility of two Alabama soils. in Van Santen, E. ed. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture—Making Conservation Tillage Conventional: Building a Future on 25 Years of Research, 24– 26 June 2002. Special Rep. 1, Auburn, AL: Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station and Auburn University. Pp. 288–294.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Worsham, A. D., and York, A. C. 1996. Cover crops for herbicide replacement in no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 10:815–821.Google Scholar