Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:04:22.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fall Application of Prodiamine for Spring Crabgrass (Digitaria spp.) Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Thomas W. Fermanian
Affiliation:
Agric. Dep. Hortic. Univ. of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana, Urbana, IL 61801
Jean E. Haley
Affiliation:
Agric. Dep. Hortic. Univ. of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana, Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

Fall application of a PRE herbicide offers professional lawncare applicators additional flexibility in scheduling necessary weed control operations. A 3-yr field study was established on common Kentucky bluegrass in Urbana, IL to examine the effectiveness of fall- or spring-applied prodiamine and DCPA for spring large and smooth crabgrass control. Prodiamine was effective for crabgrass control in turf (≥ 91% control) when applied in spring at ≥ 0.4 kg/ha or when it was applied in the fall at ≥ 0.6 kg/ha (≥ 82% control). In most cases, fall-applied prodiamine at the 0.8 kg/ha rate (≥ 91% control) controlled crabgrass as well as spring-applied DCPA at the 11.8 kg/ha rate (≥ 94% control). Little reduction in turf quality (≥ 8.3) occurred when prodiamine was applied in the fall at 0.8 kg/ha or less. Only when prodiamine was applied at 2.2 kg/ha was there significant quality loss (7.3) with spring applications. In a second experiment to evaluate split fall and spring prodiamine applications for crabgrass control, all split applications had 100% crabgrass control which was not significantly different from single applications of ≥ 1.4 kg/ha.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bhowmik, P. C. and Bingham, S. W. 1990. Preemergence activity of dinitroaniline herbicides used for weed control in cool-season turfgrasses. Weed Technol. 4:387393.Google Scholar
2. Bowe, S. J. 1986. Prodiamine: A broad spectrum preemergence herbicide for tree and vine crops. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 1986. p. 216218.Google Scholar
3. Christians, N. E. 1982. Preemergence herbicide effects on four Kentucky bluegrass cultivars. HortScience 16:911912.Google Scholar
4. Dernoeden, P. H. and Krouse, J. M. 1990. Maryland smooth crabgrass control evaluation for 1989. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 1990. p. 141142.Google Scholar
5. Gagnon, J., Haycock, K., Roth, J., Simpson, J., Finzer, B., Feldman, D., and Hofmann, R. 1989. SuperANOVA Accessible General Linear Modeling. Ver. 1.11. Abacus Concepts, Inc. Berkeley, CA. 316 p.Google Scholar
6. Hummel, N. W. Jr., Fowler, M. C., and Neal, J. C. 1990. Prodiamine effects on quality and rooting of Kentucky bluegrass turf. Crop Sci. 30:976979.Google Scholar
7. Landschoot, P. J., Watschke, T. L., and Hoyland, B. F. 1993. Influence of preemergence and postemergence herbicides on rooting of turfgrasses. Weed Technol. 7:123126.Google Scholar
8. Reicher, Z. J. and Christians, N. E. 1989. Herbicide effects on Kentucky bluegrass rooting. HortScience 24:976978.Google Scholar
9. Sybouts, M. G. 1987. Prodiamine: A long residual preemergence herbicide for use in turf. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 40:169172.Google Scholar
10. Wilson, G. B., Coats, G. E., and Ferguson, G. P. 1988. Herbicide screening studies in turf. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 1988. p. 119.Google Scholar