Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:39:29.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) Control with Various Herbicide Combinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Philip Westra ,
Philip Chapman ,
Phillip W. Stahlman ,
Stephen D. Miller  and
Peter K. Fay
Philip Westra
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Path. and Weed Sci., Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, CO 80523
Philip Chapman
Affiliation:
Dep. Statistics, Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, CO 80523
Phillip W. Stahlman
Affiliation:
Ft. Hays Branch, Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Hays, KS 67601
Stephen D. Miller
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, and Insect Sci., Univ. Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
Peter K. Fay
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dicamba, 2,4-D, picloram, and commercially available premixes of glyphosate plus 2,4-D or glyphosate plus dicamba were evaluated alone and in combination for field bindweed control in a winter wheat-fallow system in Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, and Montana. Approximately one year after application, herbicide mixtures containing picloram at 0.14 or 0.28 kg ai ha-1 provided the best control. In five of seven locations, the control provided by picloram in herbicide mixtures was greater than the control provided by glyphosate plus 2,4-D, 2,4-D, or dicamba when these products were mixed with picloram. Glyphosate plus 2,4-D or glyphosate plus dicamba premixes, or 2,4-D added to dicamba were less effective for long-term control of field bindweed than mixtures containing 0.14 kg ai ha-1 or more of picloram. Under drought conditions in Kansas in 1988, picloram did not control field bindweed as well as in Colorado, Wyoming, or Montana where rainfall was normal.

Keywords

2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy) acetic aciddicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinepicloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidfield bindweed, (Convolvulus arvensis) # CONARChemical fallowpicloramdicamba2,4-DglyphosateCONAR
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 949 - 955
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brown, E. O. and Porter, R. H. 1942. The viability and germination of seeds of Convolvulus arvensis L. and other perennial weeds. Iowa State Coll. Agric. Bull. No. 322. 31 p.Google Scholar
2. Dall'Armellina, A. A. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1989. Effect of watering frequency, drought, and glyphosate on growth of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Sci. 37:314–318.Google Scholar
3. Derscheid, L. A., Stritzke, J. F., and Wright, W. G. 1970. Field bindweed control with cultivation, cropping, and chemicals. Weed Sci. 18:590–596.Google Scholar
4. Derscheid, L. A. 1978. Controlling field bindweed while growing adapted crops. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:144–150.Google Scholar
5. Flint, J. L. and Barrett, M. 1989. Effects of glyphosate combinations with 2,4-D or dicamba on field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Sci. 37:12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Frazier, J. C. 1948. Principal noxious perennial weeds of Kansas, with emphasis upon their root systems in relation to control. Kans. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 331. 45 p.Google Scholar
7. Gillespie, G. R. 1990. Chapter 22. Picloram and clopyralid. p. 477–487. in Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
8. Harrington, H. D. 1964. p. 438–439 in Manual of the Plants of Colorado. Sage Press. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
9. Heering, D. C. and Peeper, T. F. 1991. Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) responses to picloram and 2,4-D. Weed Technol. 5:317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. p. 98–104 in The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
11. Kennedy, P. B. and Crafts, A. S. 1931. The anatomy of Convolvulus arvensis, wild morning-glory of field bindweed. Hilgardia 5:591–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Lavake, D. E., Wiese, A. F., and Chenault, E. W. 1970. Granular vs. liquid formulation of picloram, HRS 587, fenac, and 2,3,6-TBA for control of field bindweed. Weed Sci. 18:341–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1990. Cost-effective long-term leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) control with herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:635–641.Google Scholar
14. Meyer, J. L. 1978. The influence of environment on growth and control of field bindweed. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control. Conf. 33:141–142.Google Scholar
15. Phillips, W. M. 1961. Control of field bindweed by cultural and chemical methods. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1249. 47 p.Google Scholar
16. Rolston, M. P. 1978. Water impermeable seed dormancy. Bot. Rev. 44:365–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Schoenhals, M. G., Wiese, A. F., and Wood, M. L. 1990. Field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control with imazapyr. Weed Technol. 4:771–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Sherrick, S. L., Holt, H. A., and Hess, F. D. 1986. Effects of adjuvants and environment during plant development on glyphosate absorption and translocation in field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis). Weed Sci. 34:811–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Timmons, F. L. 1941. Results of bindweed control experiments at the Fort Hays Branch Station, Hays, Kansas, 1935 to 1940. Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 296. 50 p.Google Scholar
20. Timmons, F. L. 1949. Duration of viability of bindweed seed under field conditions and experimental results in the control of bindweed seedlings. Agron. J. 41:130–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Wiese, A. F. and Rea, H. E. 1962. Factors affecting the toxicity of phenoxy herbicides to field bindweed. Weed 10:58–61.Google Scholar
22. Wiese, A. F. and Lavake, D. E. 1986. Control of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 34:77–80.Google Scholar
23. Wilson, R. G. 1978. Field bindweed control in western Nebraska. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:142–144.Google Scholar