Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:59:19.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Field Extraction of Large Intact Soil Cores for Leaching Studies in the Laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

She-Kong Chong
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
Suling Zhao
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
Brian P. Klubek
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901

Abstract

Various samplers have been developed for taking intact soil cores. Very often, the sampler was used once or twice to take only a few soil cores then it became either obsolete or a burden for maintenance and storage. An economic portable hand-operated soil core sampler was developed to obtain large soil cores with a diameter of 19 cm and a length of 120 cm. The quality of large soil cores was evaluated and compared with that obtained from short cores from each soil horizon. In addition, the large intact column was used to evaluate atrazine transport under the saturated condition. Results showed that the hydraulic conductivity of the large cores were of the same magnitude as that of short cores, except for the A horizon; the hydraulic conductivity of the large cores was about 10 times greater than the short cores. Even though the sampling procedure is labor intensive, the soil sampler has the flexibility to collect different size soil cores and can be constructed at a very low cost (less than $200 including labor). Lastly, the sampler is maintenance free and can be stored easily in a limited space.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baarstad, R., Rickman, W., Wilkins, D., and Morita, S. 1993. Ahydraulic soil sampler providing minimum field plot disruption. Agron. J. 85:178181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bear, J. 1972. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. American Elsevier Pub. Co., Inc., New York. 764 p.Google Scholar
3. Belford, R. K. 1979. Collection and evaluation of large soil monoliths for soil and crop studies. J. Soil Sci. 30:363373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Berndt, R. D., Strong, W. M., and Craswell, E. T. 1976. A device for procuring undisturbed cores of cracking-clay soils. Queensland J. Agric. An. Sci. 33:115120.Google Scholar
5. Bouma, J., Baker, F. G., and Veneman, P.L.M. 1974. Measurement of water movement in soil pedons above the water table. Univ. of Wisconsin-Extension, Geological and Natural History Survey. Information Circular No. 27. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. 144 p.Google Scholar
6. Bouma, J. and Dekker, L. W. 1981. A method for measuring the vertical and horizontal Ksat of clay soils with macropores. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45:662663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Brown, K. W., Thomas, J. C., and Aurelius, M. W. 1985. Collecting and testing barrel sized undisturbed soil monoliths. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49:10671069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Buchele, W. F. 1961. A power sampler of undisturbed soils. Trans. ASAE 4:185187, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Buchter, B., Leuenberger, L., Wierenga, P. J., and Richard, F. 1984. Preparation of large core samples from stony soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:14601462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Chong, S. K., Khan, M. A., and Green, R. E. 1982. Portable hand-operated soil core sampler. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46:433434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Chong, S. K., Klubek, B. P., Zhao, S., Dobill, D., Weber, J., and Kapusta, G. 1993. Herbicide movement in soil under no-till and reduced treatments. p. 525 in Proc. 3rd Annu. Conf. on Research on Agric. Chem. in Illinois Groundwater: Status and Future Directions III. Mar. 31–Apr. 1, 1993. Makanda, IL.Google Scholar
12. Corey, A. T. 1986. Air Permeability, p. 11211136 in Klute, A., ed., Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. Am. Soc. Agron. and Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
13. Economy, K. and Bowman, R. S. 1993. Fiberglass encasement method for undisturbed soil cores. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:3941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Froehlich, H. A. and Miles, D.W.R. 1986. A freezing technique for sampling skeletal, structureless forest soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:16401642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Germann, P. and Beven, K. 1981. Water flow in soil macropores. I. An experimental approach. J. Soil Sci. 32:113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Hatfield, J. L. and Schaaf, S. L. 1993. Adjustable soil coring machine for sampling in tall row crops. Agron. J. 175178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Hendrickx, J.M.H., Ritsema, C. J., Boersma, O. H., Dekker, L. W., Hamminga, W., and van der Kolk, J.W.H. 1991. Motor-driven portable soil core sampler for volumetric sampling. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:17921795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Hipp, B. W. and Graff, P. S. 1989. Vehicle-mounted hydraulic sampler for urban soils. Agron. J. 81:702703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Jamison, V. C., Weaver, H. A., and Reed, I. F. 1950. A hammer-driven soil-core sampler. Soil Sci. 69:487496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Kelley, O. J. and Haise, H. R. 1947. A soil sampling machine for obtaining undisturbed cores. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 39:828830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Kelley, O. J., Hardman, J. A., and Jennings, D. S. 1947. A soil-sampling machine for obtaining two-, three-, and four-inch diameter cores of undisturbed soil to a depth of six feet. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 12:8587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Klute, A. 1986. Water retention: Laboratory methods. p. 635662 in Klute, A., ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. Am. Assoc. Agron. and Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Klute, A. and Dirksen, C. 1986. Hydraulic conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory method. p. 687734 in Klute, A., ed., Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. Am. Soc. Agron. and Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Lewis, T. E., Blasdell, B., and Blume, L. J. 1990. Collection of intact cores from a rocky desert and glacial till soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54:938940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Lutz, J. R. 1947. Apparatus for collecting undisturbed soil samples. Soil Sci. 64:399401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Murphey, J. B., Grissinger, E. H., and Little, W. C., 1981. Fiber-glass encasement of large, undisturbed, weakly cohesive soil samples. Soil Sci. 131:130134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Persson, L. and Bergstrom, L. 1991. Drilling method for collection of undisturbed soil monoliths. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:285287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Rhoton, F. E. and McChesney, D. S. 1991. System for collecting undisturbed cores from surface soils for micromorphological analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55:17961797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Robertson, W. K., Pope, P. E., and Tomlinson, R. T. 1974. Sampling tool for taking undisturbed soil cores. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38:855857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Savant, N. K. and De Datta, S. K. 1979. An undisturbed core sampling and sectioning technique for wetland rice soils. Commun. in Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 10:775783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Sharma, P. K. and De Datta, S. K. 1985. A core sampler for puddled soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49:10691070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Shipitalo, M. J. and Edwards, W. M. 1993. Seasonal patterns of water and chemical movement in tilled and no-till column lysimeters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57:218223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Sneath, R. W., Philips, V. R., and Price, J. S. 1989. Powered soil samplers for heavy metals and some concepts for the future. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 44:159174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Swallow, C. W., Kissel, D. E., and Owensby, C. E. 1987. Soil coring machine for microplots and large soil cores. Agron. J. 79:756758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Tessier, S. and Steppuhn, H. 1990. Quick-mount soil core sampler for measuring bulk density. Can. J. Soil Sci. 70:115118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Tindall, J. A., Hemmen, K., and Dowd, J. F. 1992. An improved method for field extraction and laboratory analysis of large, intact soil cores. J. Environ. Qual. 21:259263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Vaughan, D. H., Murali, C. B., Wilson, J. H. 1984. Soil sampler minimizes soil disturbance. Agric. Eng. 65:2425.Google Scholar
38. Vepraskas, M. J., Hoover, M. T., Beeson, J. L., Carpenter, M. S., and Richards, J. B. 1990. Sampling device to extract inclined, undisturbed soil cores. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54:11921195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Walker, D. S., O'Dell, J. D., Wolt, J. D., Rhodes, G. N. Jr., and Graved, J. G. 1990. A tractor mounted sampler for obtaining large soil columns. Weed Technol. 4:913917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. Zhao, S., 1993. Herbicide movement in soil under saturated conditions. , Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL. 68 p.Google Scholar