Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:16:20.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate and Broadleaf Herbicide Mixtures for Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jeffrey M. Ellis  and
James L. Griffin
Jeffrey M. Ellis
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
James L. Griffin
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field research conducted for 3 yr evaluated weed control in glyphosate-resistant soybean with glyphosate applied alone and in mixtures with reduced rates of the broadleaf herbicides acifluorfen, CGA-277476 (proposed name: oxasulfuron), chlorimuron, fomesafen, or lactofen. Barnyardgrass was controlled at least 95% with glyphosate at 840 and 1,120 g ai/ha, and control was not antagonized with any of the mixtures. At 14 d after treatment (DAT), wild poinsettia and prickly sida were controlled at least 90% with all glyphosate treatments. Control remained greater than 90% 28 DAT in one of the 2 yr, but in the other year, wild poinsettia was controlled 80%, and prickly sida was controlled 43% with the high rate of glyphosate. Acifluorfen or fomesafen (210 and 315 g ai/ha), or lactofen (112 and 168 g ai/ha) applied with glyphosate increased wild poinsettia control to 91 to 95% and prickly sida to 60 to 83%. At 14 DAT, pitted morningglory control improved in most cases when acifluorfen, fomesafen, or lactofen was applied with glyphosate. Hemp sesbania control was increased when glyphosate was applied with these same herbicides as well as CGA-277476 (39 and 59 g ai/ha) and chlorimuron (4.5 and 6.7 g ai/ha). But by 28 DAT, improvement in weed control with glyphosate and broadleaf herbicide mixtures was noted only in 1998, when pitted morningglory and hemp sesbania were larger at time of application (15 to 18 cm). Glyphosate alone in 1998 controlled these weeds no more than 30%, and only for hemp sesbania was control consistently more than 80% with the addition of acifluorfen or lactofen. At 28 DAT in 1999 and 2000, when weeds were no more than 10 cm, pitted morningglory was controlled 91 and 98%, respectively, and hemp sesbania 88 and 100%, respectively, with glyphosate alone at 1,120 g/ha. Soybean injury 28 DAT, consisting of foliar chlorosis and height reduction, was as much as 14, 13, and 23% for the acifluorfen, chlorimuron, and lactofen treatments, respectively, but no more than 6% for the CGA-277476 and fomesafen treatments. When weed control with glyphosate alone was at least 85%, addition of broadleaf herbicides did not improve soybean yield.

Keywords

AcifluorfenCGA-277476 (2-[[[[(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-oxetanyl ester)chlorimuronfomesafenglyphosatelactofenbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. #3 ECHCGhemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex. A. W. Hill # SEBEXpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAprickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSPwild poinsettia, Euphorbia heterophylla L. # EPHHLsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Asgrow 5901 RR’Herbicide mixturesDAT, days after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 21 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. ed. 1994. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 149–152.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002. Louisiana Suggested Chemical Weed Control Guide. Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service. Publication 1565. 133 p.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C. 1992. Rationale for developing herbicide-resistant crops. Weed Technol. 6: 621–625.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1988. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3: 596–601.Google Scholar
Corkern, C. B., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., and Jordan, D. L. 1998. Bromoxynil antagonizes johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with graminicides. Weed Technol. 12: 205–208.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1998. Weed management in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. J. Cotton Sci. 4: 174–185.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Jennigs, K. M. 2000. Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14: 77–88.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. M. and Griffin, J. L. 2002. Benefits of soil-applied herbicides in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16: 541–547.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. M., Shaw, D. R., and Barrentine, W. L. 1998. Soybean (Glycine max) seed quality and harvesting efficiency as affected by low weed densities. Weed Technol. 12: 166–173.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D., Hurst, H. R., and Austin, D. F. 1990. Biology and control of morningglories (Ipomoea spp). Rev. Weed Sci. 5: 83–114.Google Scholar
Harris, J. R., Gossett, B. J., Murphy, T. R., and Toler, J. E. 1991. Response of broadleaf weeds and soybeans to the diphenylether herbicides. J. Prod. Agric. 4: 407–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, J. M., Whitwell, T., Murdock, E. C., and Toler, J. E. 1988. Recovery of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) following applications of acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen. Weed Sci. 36: 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11: 354–362.Google Scholar
Kapusta, G., Krausz, R. F., and Matthews, J. L. 1994. Soybean tolerance and summer annual weed control with glufosinate and glyphosate in resistant soybeans. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 49: 120.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1996. Control of annual weeds with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 10: 957–962.Google Scholar
Lich, J. M., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1997. Interaction of glyphosate with postemergence soybean (Glycine max) herbicides. Weed Sci. 45: 12–21.Google Scholar
Mulkey, J. L., Griffin, J. L., Vidrine, P. R., Jordan, D. L., Clay, P. A., and Miller, D. K. 1998. Weed control in soybean with Roundup Ultra and Classic tank mixtures. Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. 51:5.Google Scholar
Palmer, E. W., Shaw, D. R., and Holloway, J. C. Jr. 2000. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with CGA-277476 and four postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 14: 617–623.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R. and Arnold, J. C. 2002. Weed control from herbicide combinations with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 16: 1–6.Google Scholar
Starke, R. J. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 46: 652–660.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Reynolds, D. B., and Griffin, J. L. 1992. Postemergence hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6: 374–377.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Coble, H. D., York, A. C., and Monks, D. W. 1996. The niche for herbicide-resistant crops in U.S. agriculture. In Duke, S. O., ed. Herbicide-Resistant Crops: Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. pp. 213–230.Google Scholar
Willard, T. S. and Griffin, J. L. 1993. Soybean (Glycine max) yield and quality responses associated with wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) control programs. Weed Technol. 7: 118–122.Google Scholar