Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T21:43:24.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate-Induced Weed Shifts in Glyphosate-Resistant Corn or a Rotation of Glyphosate-Resistant Corn, Sugarbeet, and Spring Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert G. Wilson ,
Stephen D. Miller ,
Philip Westra ,
Andrew R. Kniss ,
Phillip W. Stahlman ,
Gail W. Wicks  and
Stephen D. Kachman
Robert G. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Stephen D. Miller
Affiliation:
Plant Sciences Department, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071
Philip Westra
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences and Pest Management, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Andrew R. Kniss
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Phillip W. Stahlman
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Center, Kansas State University, Hays, KS 67601
Gail W. Wicks
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, North Platte, NE 69101, deceased
Stephen D. Kachman
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: rwilson1@unl.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field trial was conducted for 6 yr (1998 through 2003) at Scottsbluff, NE, to measure weed shifts following multiple applications of two rates of glyphosate or alternating glyphosate with nonglyphosate treatments in continuous corn or in a crop rotation of corn, sugarbeet, and spring wheat with all three crops resistant to glyphosate. After 6 yr, plant densities of common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, hairy nightshade, and common purslane increased in the crop-rotation treatment compared with continuous corn. There were four weed control subplot treatments consisting of two in-crop applications of glyphosate at 0.4 or 0.8 kg ae/ha each spring, alternating two applications of glyphosate at 0.8 kg/ha one year with a nonglyphosate treatment the next year, or a nonglyphosate treatment each year. The composition of the weed population averaged across all four treatments shifted from kochia and wild proso millet to predominately common lambsquarters. After 3 yr of using glyphosate at 0.4 kg/ha twice each year, common lambsquarters density increased compared with that in the 0.8 kg/ha rate of glyphosate or alternating glyphosate treatments. By the sixth year, the density of common lambsquarters in the glyphosate at 0.4 kg/ha treatment had increased to the extent that corn grain yield was reduced 43% compared with corn grain yield in the 0.8 kg/ha glyphosate treatment. Using glyphosate at either rate for 6 yr decreased the densities of kochia, wild proso millet, and longspine sandbur, did not alter densities of redroot pigweed and green foxtail, and increased the density of hairy nightshade. In the low-rate treatment of glyphosate, the number of common lambsquarters seeds in the seed bank were 134 seeds/kg soil in 1998, declined to 15 seeds/kg by 2002, but began to increase in 2003 as the densities of plants not controlled by glyphosate increased.

Keywords

Glyphosatecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALcommon purslane, Portulaca oleracea L. POROLgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv. SETVIhairy nightshade, Solanum physalifolium Rusby SOLSAkochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. KCHSClongspine sandbur, Cenchrus longispinus (Hack.) Fern. CCHPAredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. AMAREwild proso millet, Panicum miliaceum L. PANMIcorn, Zea mays L.spring wheat, Triticum aestivum L.sugarbeet, Beta vulgaris L.Alternating glyphosateseed bankweed shift
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 900 - 909
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Cowett, E. R. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds in North America. Pages 9–30. in LeBaron, H.M., Gressel, J. eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Buttel, F. H. 2002. The Adoption and Diffusion of GM Crop Varieties: The “Genetic Revolution” in Global Perspective. 1996–2001. Madison, WI University of Wisconsin PTAS Staff Paper Series 6.Google Scholar
Clements, D. R., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1994. Integrated weed management and weed species diversity. Phytoprotection 75:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. 2006. Glyphosate-induced weed shifts. Weed Technol. 20:277–281.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Grey, T. L., Vencill, W. K., Kichler, J. M., Webster, T. M., Brown, S. M., York, A. C., Davis, J. W., and Hanna, W. W. 2006. Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci. 54:620–626.Google Scholar
Fryer, J. D. 1981. Weed management: fact or fable? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B295 185. 197.Google Scholar
Haas, H. and Streibig, J. C. 1982. Changing patterns of weed distribution as a result of herbicide use and other agronomic factors. Pages 57–80. in Le Baron, H.M., Gessel, J. eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1957. Ecological aspects of weed control. Outlook Agric. 1:197–205.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapusta, G. L., Krausz, R. F., and Matthews, J. L. 1994. Soybean tolerance and summer annual weed control with glufosinate and glyphosate in resistant soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 49:120.Google Scholar
SAS 2004. SAS Online Doc. 9.1.3. Cary, NC SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Scursoni, J., Forcella, F., Gunsolus, J., Owen, M., Oliver, R., Smeda, R., and Vidrine, R. 2006. Weed diversity and soybean yield with glyphosate management along a north-south transect in the United States. Weed Sci. 54:713–179.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. 2000. The impact of glyphosate tolerant crops on the use of other herbicides and on resistance management. Pest Manag. Sci. 56:320–326.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Clements, D. R., and Derksen, D. A. 1993. Weed succession under conservation tillage: a hierarchical framework for research and management. Weed Technol. 7:286–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westra, P., Wilson, R., Stahlman, P., Miller, S., Wicks, G., Nissen, S., Chapman, P., and Withrow, J. 2004. Results of six years of weed shift studies in Central Great Plains Roundup Ready irrigated and dryland crops. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 42:92.Google Scholar
Young, B. 2006. Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate resistant crops. Weed Technol. 20:301–307.Google Scholar