Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:21:42.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide Systems in Stale Seedbed Soybean (Glycine max) Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Lawrence R. Oliver ,
Tracy E. Klingaman ,
Marilyn McClelland  and
Robert C. Bozsa
Lawrence R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Tracy E. Klingaman
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Marilyn McClelland
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Robert C. Bozsa
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted using a stale seedbed production system to determine the effect of herbicide application time on preplant, preplant incorporated (PPI), and at-planting treatments on weed control and soybean yield. Herbicides were applied on the surface preplant (PPL) or PPI at 6 to 7, 4 to 5, and 2 to 3 wk before planting and just prior to planting. The differences in weed control and soybean yield among years were due to rainfall patterns 2 wk after herbicide application and during the growing season. Preplant treatments applied 2 to 5 wk before planting generally controlled common cocklebur and pitted morningglory better than preplant treatments applied 6 to 7 wk before planting due to persistence of herbicide activity or treatments at planting due to a greater chance of obtaining adequate rainfall for herbicide activation, more uniform seedbed at planting, and larger weeds at application. Metribuzin plus chlorimuron was less suited than imazaquin as a preplant treatment when applied more than 2 weeks before planting.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]-amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethy)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolincarboxylic acidmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onesoybean, [Glycine max. (L.) Merr.], common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. # XANST3 pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLANarrow-row soybeanchlorimuronimazaquinmetribuzinIpomoea lacunosaXanthium strumariumIPOLAXANST
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 816 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bharati, M. P., Whigham, D. K., and Voss, R. D. 1986. Soybean response to tillage and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization. Agron. J. 78:947–950.Google Scholar
2. Buhler, D. D. and Oplinger, E. S. 1990. Influence of tillage systems on annual weed densities and control in solid-seeded soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:158–165.Google Scholar
3. Buhler, D. D. and Werling, V. L. 1989. Weed control from imazaquin and metolachlor in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37: 392–399.Google Scholar
4. Crabtree, R. J. and Rupp, R. N. 1980. Double and monocropped wheat and soybeans under different tillage and row spacings. Agron. J. 72: 445–448.Google Scholar
5. Elmore, R. W. 1987. Soybean cultivar response to tillage systems. Agron. J. 79:114–119.Google Scholar
6. Fehr, W. R. and Caviness, C. E. 1977. Stages of soybean development. Iowa Agric. Exp. Stn. Spec. Rep. 80.Google Scholar
7. Finley, C., Viar, B., and Ellison, E. 1985. Conservation till soybean production—Answers to weed control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38: 56–57.Google Scholar
8. Heatherly, L. G. and Elmore, C. D. 1983. Response of soybeans (Glycine max) to planting in untilled, weedy seedbed on clay soil. Weed Sci. 31:93–99.Google Scholar
9. Heatherly, L. G. and Elmore, C. D. 1986. Irrigation and planting date effects on soybean grown on clay soil. Agron. J. 78:576–580.Google Scholar
10. Howe, O. W. III and Oliver, L. R. 1987. Influences of soybean (Glycine max) row spacing on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) interference. Weed Sci. 35:185–193.Google Scholar
11. Joshi, J. M. 1980. Effect of planting dates and soybean cultivars on pod damage by corn earworm. Crop Sci. 20:59–63.Google Scholar
12. Kapusta, G. 1979. Seedbed tillage and herbicide influence on soybean (Glycine max) weed control and yield. Weed Sci. 27:520–526.Google Scholar
13. Laws, F. 1990. Stale seedbeds: key to early soybeans. Delta Farm Press 47(12):21 and 34–37.Google Scholar
14. Martin, C. K., Cassel, D. K., and Kamprath, E. J. 1979. Irrigation and tillage effects on soybean yield in a coastal plain soil. Agron. J. 71: 592–594.Google Scholar
15. Sanford, J. O., Myhre, D. L., and Merwine, N. C. 1973. Double cropping systems involving no-tillage and conventional tillage. Agron. J. 65:978–982.Google Scholar
16. Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant herbicide applications for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci. 32:293–298.Google Scholar
17. Triplett, G. B. and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20:453–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Werling, V. L. and Buhler, D. D. 1988. Influence of application time on clomazone activity in no-till soybeans, (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36: 629–635.Google Scholar
19. Whatley, T. L., Sandberg, C. L., and Wu, C. H. 1984. Annual weed control on stale seedbeds with glyphosate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:53.Google Scholar