Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:19:49.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide systems including linuron for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in sweetpotato

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2020

Levi D. Moore Open the ORCID record for Levi D. Moore [Opens in a new window] ,
Katherine M. Jennings ,
David W. Monks ,
Michael D. Boyette ,
David L. Jordan  and
Ramon G. Leon
Levi D. Moore*
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Katherine M. Jennings
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Michael D. Boyette
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Ramon G. Leon
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Levi D. Moore, Graduate Student, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, 2721 Founders Drive, Raleigh, NC27965. Email: ldmoore8@ncsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to determine sweetpotato tolerance to and weed control from management systems that included linuron. Treatments included flumioxazin preplant (107 g ai ha−1) followed by (fb) S-metolachlor (800 g ai ha−1), oryzalin (840 g ai ha−1), or linuron (280, 420, 560, 700, and 840 g ai ha−1) alone or mixed with S-metolachlor or oryzalin applied 7 d after transplanting. Weeds did not emerge before the treatment applications. Two of the four field studies were maintained weed-free throughout the season to evaluate sweetpotato tolerance without weed interference. The herbicide program with the greatest sweetpotato yield was flumioxazin fb S-metolachlor. Mixing linuron with S-metolachlor did not improve Palmer amaranth management and decreased marketable yield by up to 28% compared with flumioxazin fb S-metolachlor. Thus, linuron should not be applied POST in sweetpotato if Palmer amaranth has not emerged at the time of application.

Keywords

FlumioxazinlinuronoryzalinS-metolachlorPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson AMAPAWeed controlherbicide tillageherbicide cultivation
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 49 - 56
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Darren Robinson, University of Guelph

References

Anonymous (2013) Linex® 4L herbicide label. Phoenix, AZ: Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. Google Scholar
Anonymous (2014) Surflan® AS specialty herbicide label. King of Prussia, PA: United Phosphorus, Inc. Google Scholar
Anonymous (2015) Dual MAGNUM® herbicide product label. Greensboro, NC: Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. Google Scholar
Anonymous (2016) Valor® SX herbicide product label. Walnut Creek, CA: Valent U.S.A. Corporation.Google Scholar
Barkley, SL, Chaudhari, S, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Meyers, SL, Monks, DW (2016) Fomesafen programs for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in sweetpotato. Weed Technol 30:506–515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basinger, NT, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Jordan, DL, Everman, WJ, Hestir, EL, Waldschmidt, MD, Smith, SC, Brownie, C (2019) Interspecific and intraspecific interference of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) in sweetpotato. Weed Sci 67:426–432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batts, R (2019) Summary of IR-4 product performance trials for linuron applied to sweetpotato. Princeton NJ: The IR-4 Project. PR#: P11118. 160 pGoogle Scholar
Beam, SC, Jennings, KM, Chaudhari, S, Monks, DW, Schultheis, JR, Waldschmidt, M (2018) Response of sweetpotato cultivars to linuron rate and application time. Weed Technol 32:665–670 Google Scholar
Brandenberger, L, Carrier, L, Havener, R, Adams, R (2009) Screening pre and postemergence herbicides for use in cilantro (Coriandrum sativum). Page 55 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. Orlando, FL: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Chaudhari, S, Jennings, KM, Meyers, SL (2018) Response of sweetpotato to oryzalin application rate and timing. Weed Technol 32:722–725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewis, SB, Everman, WJ, Jordan, DL, Wilcut, JW (2007) Weed management in North Carolina peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with S-metolachlor, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone systems. Weed Technol 21:629–635 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frans, RE, Talbert, RE, Marx, D, Crowley, H (1986) Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 29–46 in Camper, ND, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd edn. Champaign IL: Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Giacomini, DA, Umphres, AM, Nie, H, Mueller, TC, Steckel, LE, Young, BG, Scott, RC, Tranel, PJ (2017) Two new PPX2 mutations associated with resistance to PPO-inhibiting herbicides in Amaranthus palmeri . Pest Manag Sci 73:1559–1563 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gossett, BJ, Murdock, EC, Toler, JE (1992) Resistance of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to the dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Technol 6:587–591 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, WJ, Dotray, PA, Trostle, CL (2015) Castor (Ricinus communis L.) tolerance and weed control with preemergence herbicides. Ind Crops Prod 76:710–716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2020) The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. https://weedscience.org. Accessed: January 2, 2020Google Scholar
Horak, MJ, Loughin, TM (2000) Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Sci 48:347–355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, BJ (1997) Reduced herbicide rates for large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) and goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Sci 45:283–287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, PE, Carter, CH, Thullen, RJ (1987) Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci 35:199–204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugo Torres, ML, Couto, R, Robles, W (2016) Evaluation of preemergence and early postemergence herbicides on sweetpotato and cassava in tropical conditions. Page 92 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. San Juan, Puerto Rico: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW (2012) Response of sweetpotato cultivars to S-metolachlor rate and application time. Weed Technol 26:474–479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW (2013a) Herbicide-based weed management programs for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in sweetpotato. Weed Technol 27:331–340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Miller, DK, Shankle, MW (2013b) Rate and application timing effects on tolerance of Covington sweetpotato to S-metolachlor. Weed Technol 27:729–734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW (2017) Sweetpotato tolerance and Palmer amaranth control with metribuzin and oryzalin. Weed Technol 31:903–907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Monks, DW (2010a) Interference of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in sweetpotato. Weed Sci 58:199–203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Monks, DW (2010b) Evaluation of flumioxazin and S-metolachlor rate and timing for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in sweetpotato. Weed Technol 24:495–503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Monks, DW (2016) Evaluation of wick-applied glyphosate for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in sweetpotato. Weed Technol 30:765–772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, DK, Mathews, MM, Smith, TP (2013) Weed control and sweet potato tolerance to linuron and fomesafen. Page 218 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. Houston, TX: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Poirier, AH, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Chandi, A, Everman, WJ, Whitaker, JR (2014) Distribution of glyphosate- and thifensulfuron-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in North Carolina. Int J Agron 2014:1–7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, CE, Estorninos, LE, Singh, V, Salas, RA, Singh, S, Burgos, NR (2015) Sweet potato response to select herbicides for weed control in Arkansas. Page 111 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. Savannah, GA: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Salas-Perez, RA, Burgos, NR, Rangani, G, Singh, S, Refatti, JP, Piveta, L, Tranel, PJ, Mauromoustakos, A, Scott, RC (2017) Frequency of Gly-210 deletion mutation among protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) populations. Weed Sci 65:718–731 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seem, JE, Creamer, NG, Monks, DW (2003) Critical weed-free period for ‘Beauregard’ sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas). Weed Technol 17:686–695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, BA, Smeda, RJ, Johnson, WG, Kendig, JA, Ellersieck, MR (2003) Comparative growth of six Amaranthus species in Missouri. Weed Sci 51:329–333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, SC, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Chaudhari, S, Schultheis, JF, Reberg-Horton, SC (2020) Critical timing of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) removal in sweetpotato. Weed Technol doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2020.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Webster, TM, Grey, TL, Culpepper, AS (2014) Severed stems of Amaranthus palmeri are capable of regrowth and seed production in Gossypium hirsutum . Ann Appl Biol 165:147–154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture (2005) United States standards for grades of sweet potatoes. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Google Scholar
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Agriculture Statistics Service (2019) Quick stats. https://www.quickstats.nass.usda.gov. Accessed: November 8, 2019Google Scholar
Varanasi, VK, Brabham, C, Norsworthy, JK, Nie, H, Young, BG, Houston, M, Barber, T, Scott, RC (2018) A statewide survey of PPO-inhibitor resistance and the prevalent target-site mechanisms in Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions from Arkansas. Weed Sci 66:149–158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volmer, KM, Wilson, HP, Hines, TE (2014) Assessment of herbicides for management of a glyphosate-resistant palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) population in soybeans. Page 141 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. Birmingham, AL: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM (2010) Weed survey - southern states: vegetable, fruit, and nut subsection. Pages 246-257 in Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science Society. Westminster, CO: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, JR, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Culpepper, AS, Sosnoskie, LM (2011) Residual herbicides for Palmer amaranth control. J Cotton Sci 15:89–99 Google Scholar
Yencho, GC, Pecota, KV, Schultheis, JR, VanEsbroeck, Z-P, Holmes, GJ, Little, BE, Thornton, AC, Truong, VD (2008) ‘Covington’ Sweetpotato. Hort Sci 43:1911–1914 Google Scholar