Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:11:29.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imazamox Plus Propanil Mixtures for Grass Weed Management in Imidazolinone-Resistant Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

J. Caleb Fish ,
Eric P. Webster ,
David C. Blouin  and
Jason A. Bond
J. Caleb Fish
Affiliation:
School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 45 Agricultural Administration Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Jason A. Bond
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: ewebster@agcenter.lsu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study was established to evaluate interactions between imazamox at 0 and 44 g ai ha−1 mixed with propanil at 0, 1,120, 2,240, 3,360, and 4,480 g ai ha−1 for the control of red rice and barnyardgrass. Blouin's Modified Colby's procedure was used to test for interactions. At 7 d after treatment (DAT), a synergistic response occurred for red rice treated with imazamox at 44 g ha−1 mixed with propanil at 3,360 and 4,480 g ha−1 by increasing expected control of 62% to an observed control of 67 and 75%, respectively, and the synergistic response continued across all evaluations through 49 DAT. No antagonism occurred for any imazamox plus propanil mixture for red rice control. An antagonistic response was shown for barnyardgrass control with imazamox at 44 g ha−1 mixed with any rate of propanil, at 7 DAT. However, imazamox plus propanil at 4,480 g ha−1 resulted in a neutral response at 14 through 49 DAT. Rice treated with imazamox plus propanil at 4,480 g ha−1 plus imazamox resulted in a yield of 6,640 kg ha−1. The synergistic response observed for red rice control with a mixture of imazamox plus propanil can benefit producers by increasing control of red rice, and this mixture contains two different modes of action that can be part of an overall resistance management strategy.

Se estableció un estudio para evaluar interacciones entre imazamox a 0 y 44 g ai ha−1 mezclado con propanil a 0, 1,120, 2,240, 3,360, y 4,480 g ai ha−1 para el control de arroz rojo y Echinochloa crus-galli. El procedimiento modificado Colby y Blouin fue usado para evaluar las interacciones. A 7 d después del tratamiento (DAT), ocurrió una respuesta sinérgica en el arroz rojo tratado con imazamox a 44 g ha−1 mezclado con propanil a 3,360 y 4, 480 g ha−1 al incrementarse el control esperado de 62% a un valor observado de 67 a 75%, respectivamente, y la respuesta sinérgica continuó en todas las evaluaciones hasta 49 DAT. No ocurrió antagonismo para ninguno de las mezclas de imazamox más propanil en el control de arroz rojo. Se demostró una respuesta antagónica en el control de E. crus-galli con imazamox a 44 g ha−1 en mezcla con cualquier dosis de propanil, a 7 DAT. Sin embargo, imazamox más propanil a 4,480 g ha−1 resultaron en una respuesta neutral entre 14 y 49 DAT. El arroz tratado con imazamox más propanil a 4,480 g ha−1 más imazamox resultó en un rendimiento de 6,640 kg ha−1. La respuesta sinérgica observada para el control de arroz rojo con una mezcla de imazamox más propanil puede beneficiar a los productores al incrementar el control del arroz rojo. Además, esta mezcla contiene dos modos de acción diferente que pueden ser parte de una estrategia general de manejo de resistencia a herbicidas.

Keywords

Imazethapyrpropanilbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.red rice, Oryza sativa L.rice, Oryza sativa L.Additive interactionantagonismneutral interaction
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 29 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Prashant Jha, Montana State University.

References

Literature Cited

Berenbaum, MC (1981) Criteria for analyzing interactions between biologically active agents. Adv Cancer Res 35:269–335 Google Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2010) On a method for synergistic and antagonistic joint-action effects with fenoxaprop mixtures in rice. Weed Technol 24:583–589 Google Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2011) On the analysis of combined experiments. Weed Technol 25:165–169 Google Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Zhang, W (2004) Analysis of synergistic and antagonistic effects of herbicides using non-linear mixed model methodology. Weed Technol 18:464–472 Google Scholar
Carey, VF III, Hoagland, RE, Talbert, RE (1995) Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 9:366–372 Google Scholar
Carlson, TP, Webster, EP, Salassi, ME, Bond, JA, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2012) Economic evaluations of imazethapyr rates and timings on rice. Weed Technol 26:24–28 Google Scholar
Carlson, TP, Webster, EP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2011) Imazethapyr plus propanil programs in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 25:205–211 Google Scholar
Colby, SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22 Google Scholar
Craigmiles, JP (1978) Introduction. Pages 5–6 in Eastin, EF, ed. Red rice research and control. College Station, TX: Tex Agric Exp Stn Bull B-1270Google Scholar
Croughan, TP (1994) Application of tissue culture techniques to development of herbicide resistant rice. La Agric 37:25–26 Google Scholar
Dowler, CC (1997) Weed survey—southern states. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 50:237 Google Scholar
Drury, RE (1980) Physiological interaction, its mathematical expression. Weed Sci 28:573–579 Google Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA, Thevis, EL, Fickett, ND (2012) Herbicide mixture may increase activity of Newpath and red rice. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 65:73 Google Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, McKnight, BM, Fickett, ND, Bond, JA (2013) Newpath + propanil Interactions Influence Weed Control in Clearfield Rice. Weed Science Society of America 53. http://wssaabstracts.com/public/17/abstract-13.html. Accessed February 24, 2015Google Scholar
Hatzios, KK, Penner, D (1985) Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev Weed Sci 1:1–63 Google Scholar
Holm, LG, Plucknett, DL, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP (1977) The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: Univ Press Hawaii. P 1129 Google Scholar
Hydrick, DE, Shaw, DR (1994) Effects of tank-mix combinations of non-selective foliar and selective soil-applied herbicides on three weed species. Weed Technol 8:129–133 Google Scholar
Khodayari, K, Smith, RJ Jr., Black, HL (1987) Red rice (Oryza sativa) control with herbicide treatments in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 35:127–129 Google Scholar
Lanclos, DY, Webster, EP, Zhang, W (2002) Glufosinate tank-mix combinations in glufosinate-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 16:659–663 Google Scholar
Morse, PM (1978) Some comments on the assessment of joint action in herbicide mixtures. Weed Sci 26:58–71 Google Scholar
Nash, RG (1981) Phytotoxic interaction studies—techniques for evaluation and presentation of results. Weed Sci 29:147–155 Google Scholar
Neve, P, Norsworthy, JK, Smith, KL, Zelaya, IA (2011) Modeling glyphosate resistance management strategies for Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in cotton. Weed Technol 25:335–343 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Burgos, NR, Scott, RC, Smith, KL (2007) Consultant perspectives on weed management needs in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol 21:832–839 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60 (Special Issue 1):31–62 Google Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP (2004) Imazethapyr at different rates and timings in drill- and water-seeded imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed Technol 18:223–227 Google Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP, Zhang, W, Blouin, DC (2003) Herbicide mixtures in water-seeded imidazolinone-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 17:836–841 Google Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP, Zhang, W, Blouin, DC (2004) Potential use of imazethapyr mixtures in drill-seeded imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 18:1037–1042 Google Scholar
[SAS] SAS Institute (2011) Base SAS 9.3 Procedures Guide. Cary, NC SAS Institute Google Scholar
[SAS] SAS Institute (2008) SAS/STAT 9.2 User's Guide. Cary, NC SAS Institute Google Scholar
Shaner, DL, ed (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America. Pp 254–255 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr. (1961) 3,4-dichloropropionanilide for control of barnyardgrass in rice. Weeds 9:318–322 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr. (1965) Propanil and mixtures with propanil for weed control in rice. Weeds 13:236–238 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr. (1981) Control of red rice (Oryza sativa) in water-seeded rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci 29:663–666 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr., Hill, JE (1990) Weed control technology in U.S. rice. Pages 314–327 in Grayson, BT, Green, MB, Copping, LG, eds. Pest Management in Rice. London, United Kingdom Elsevier Science Google Scholar
Stidham, MA, Singh, BK (1991) Imidazolinone-acetohydroxyacid synthase interactions. Pages 72–89 in Shaner, DL, O'Connor, SL, eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL CRC Press Google Scholar
Stougaard, RN, Shea, PJ, Martin, AR (1990) Effect of soil type and pH on adsorption, mobility, and efficacy of imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Sci 38:67–73 Google Scholar
Streibig, JC, Kudsk, P, Jensen, JE (1998) A general joint action model for herbicide mixtures. Pestic Sci 53:21–28 Google Scholar
Webster, EP (2014). Weed management. Pages 54–81 in Saichuk, J., ed. Louisiana Rice Production Handbook. Baton Rouge, LA La State Univ Agric Ctr Pub 2321-5/14 rev Google Scholar
Webster, EP, Carlson, TP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2012) Imazethapyr plus residual herbicide programs for imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 26:410–416 Google Scholar
Webster, EP, Masson, JA (2001) Acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides on imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed Sci 49:652–657.Google Scholar
Webster, EP, Mudge, CR, Zhang, W, Leon, CT (2006) Bensulfuron and halosulfuron alter clomazone activity on rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 20:520–525 Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2004) Weed survey—southern states. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 57:404–426 Google Scholar
Zhang, W, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Leon, CT (2005) Fenoxaprop interactions for barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice. Weed Technol 19:293–297 Google Scholar
Zhang, W, Webster, EP, Lanclos, DY, Geaghan, JP (2003) Effect of weed interference and weed free duration on glufosinate-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 17:876–880 Google Scholar