Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:46:45.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imazaquin Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism in Flue-Cured Tobacco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Frank R. Walls Jr. ,
Frederick T. Corbin ,
William K. Collins ,
A. Douglas Worsham  and
J. R. Bradley Jr.
Frank R. Walls Jr.
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Frederick T. Corbin
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
William K. Collins
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
A. Douglas Worsham
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
J. R. Bradley Jr.
Affiliation:
Entomol. Dep., N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Absorption of 14C-imazaquin by leaves of field-grown flue-cured tobacco was similar when applied to young seedlings immediately after transplanting or to plants 3 wk after transplanting. The distribution of 14C in treated leaves indicated that 40% was absorbed, 54% remained in water extracts of leaf surfaces, and 6% was found in the epicuticular wax layer 8 d after treatment. Translocation of the herbicide from treated leaves to roots was very low (4 to 5%). In contrast, soil applications of imazaquin and subsequent uptake by roots resulted in retention of 40 to 53% in roots and translocation of 47 to 60% to shoots after 8 d. Analyses of methanol-soluble extracts of 14C indicated that more than 77% of the foliar-applied herbicide was metabolized in roots and upper shoots after 2 d. Similarly, 64% or more of the imazaquin was degraded in roots and shoots 2 d after root absorption.

Keywords

Imazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidtobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L. ‘McNair 944’Crop toleranceherbicide selectivityweed controlimidazolinone herbicide
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 370 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Corbin, F. T. and Swisher, B. A. 1986. Radioisotope techniques. p. 265–276 in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Third Edition. South. Weed Sci. Soc., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
2. Elmore, C. D. 1983. Weed survey—Southern states. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:148–184.Google Scholar
3. Hardcastle, W. S. 1984. Sicklepod control in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:68.Google Scholar
4. Hawks, S. N. Jr. and Collins, W. K. 1983. p. 205–209 in Principles of Flue-Cured Tobacco Production. Hawks and Collins, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
5. Lewis, W. M., York, A. C., Coble, H. D., and Worsham, A. D. 1985. Chemical weed control in field crops. p. 207–225 in 1985 North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual. Sch. Agric. Life Sci., N. C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
6. Lignowski, E. M. 1985. Imazaquin: development status and plans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:63.Google Scholar
7. Martin, P. K. 1984. Scepter herbicide (AC 252,214) results of 1983 field trials in the southern region. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:377.Google Scholar
8. Nandihalli, V. B. and Bendixen, L. E. 1988. Toxicity and site of uptake of soil-applied imazaquin in yellow and purple nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus and C. rofundus). Weed Sci. 36:411–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Orwick, P. L., Marc, P. A., Umeda, K., Shaner, D. L., Lois, M., and Ciarlante, D. 1983. AC 252,214. A new broad spectrum herbicide for soybeans: Greenhouse studies. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:90.Google Scholar
10. Pepper, M. N., Walker, R. H., and Harris, J. R. 1985. Application methods and rate effects with DPX-F6025 and imazaquin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:71.Google Scholar
11. Risley, M. A. and Oliver, L. R. 1984. Influence of application method of AC 252,214 on a spectrum of weed species. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:72.Google Scholar
12. Sander, K. W. and Barrett, M. 1989. Differential imazaquin tolerance and behavior in selected corn hybrids. Weed Sci. 37:290–295.Google Scholar
13. Shaner, D. L., Anderson, P. C., and Stidham, M. A. 1984. Imidazolinones: potent inhibitors of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Plant Physiol. 76:545–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Shaner, D. L. and Robson, P. A. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 252,214 in soybean (Glycine max), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrastii). Weed Sci. 33:469–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Walls, F. R. Jr., Worsham, A. D., Collins, W. K., Corbin, F. T., and Bradley, J. R. Jr. 1987. Evaluation of imazaquin for weed control in flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Weed Sci. 35:824–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M. G., and Cole, T. A. 1988. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of foliar-applied imazaquin in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and associated weeds. Weed Sci. 36:5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Van Ellis, M. R. and Shaner, D. L. 1988. Mechanism of cellular absorption of imidazolinones in soybean (Glycine max) leaf discs. Pestic. Sci. 23:25–34.Google Scholar
18. Worsham, A. D. 1970. Herbicide performance in flue-cured tobacco. Weed Sci. 18:648–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar