Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:17:20.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Soybean Leaf Interference and Row Spacing on Preharvest Glyphosate Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark J. Vangessel ,
Cory M. Whaley  and
Quintin R. Johnson
Mark J. Vangessel*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Georgetown, DE 19947
Cory M. Whaley
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Georgetown, DE 19947
Quintin R. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Georgetown, DE 19947
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: mjv@udel.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Preharvest applications of glyphosate can be useful in controlling perennial weeds. Experiments were conducted from 1996 to 1999 to determine whether preharvest glyphosate applications are affected by differences in the amount of soybean canopy present at the time of application by measuring spray deposition and subsequently horsenettle or Canada thistle control. Soybean leaf interference levels were achieved by use of three soybean cultivars with different maturity groups to achieve no leaf interference, moderate leaf interference, and maximum leaf interference, and soybean was planted in three row spacings ranging from 19 to 76 cm. As soybean leaf interference increased, spray coverage of spray deposition cards decreased. There was a similar trend for relative spray volume, determined by intensity of the color change with water-sensitive cards. Row spacing did not influence spray coverage or relative spray volume. Percent change in horsenettle or Canada thistle stems from fall to spring counts was inconsistent. Differences detected in spray coverage did not influence weed control or weed stem density the following spring.

Keywords

GlyphosateCanada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. # CIRARhorsenettle, Solanum carolinense L. # SOLCAsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrCIRARCirsium arvensecultural practicesintegrated weed managementperennial weed controlSolanum carolinenseSOLCAspray deposition
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , September 2003 , pp. 491 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, W. P. 1991. Horsenettle. In Perennial Weeds: Characteristics and Identification of Selected Herbaceous Species. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press. pp. 149–156.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. 1994. Biology and control of common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca). Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 227–250.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. J. and Donald, W. W. 1988. Fall-applied glyphosate for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 2: 445–455.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. 1990. Management and control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Rev. Weed Sci. 5: 193–250.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. 1993. Retreatment with fall-applied herbicides for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control. Weed Sci. 41: 434–440.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. 1994. The biology of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Rev. Weed Sci. 6: 77–101.Google Scholar
Ilnicki, R. D., Tisdell, T. F., Fertig, S. N., and Furrer, A. H. Jr. 1962. Life History Studies As Related to Weed Control in the Northeast—Horsenettle. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Rhode Island Bull. 368. 54 p.Google Scholar
Orfanedes, M. S. and Wax, L. M. 1991. Differential response of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) to clopyralid, Dowco 433, and 2,4-D. Weed Technol. 5: 782–788.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R. and Mack, R. E. 1991. Application timing of herbicides for control of redvine (Brunnichia ovata). Weed Technol. 5: 125–129.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E. and Riley, W. R. 1982. The biology of Canadian weeds. 53. Convolvulus arvensis L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62: 461–472.Google Scholar
Whaley, C. M. and VanGessel, M. J. 2002a. Effect of fall herbicides treatments and stage of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) senescence on control. Weed Technol. 16: 301–308.Google Scholar
Whaley, C. M. and VanGessel, M. J. 2002b. Horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) control with a field corn (Zea mays) weed management program. Weed Technol. 16: 293–300.Google Scholar