Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:41:08.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improved herbicide selectivity in tomato by safening action of benoxacor and fenclorim

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2020

Edicarlos Castro
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Plant Protection, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, SP18610, Brazil Visiting Research Scholar, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, USA
Carolina Pucci
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Plant Protection, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, SP18610, Brazil Visiting Research Scholar, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, USA
Stefano Duarte
Affiliation:
Visiting Research Scholar, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, USA Graduate Student, Department of Biosystems Engineering, University of São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP13635, Brazil
Nilda Roma Burgos
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Te Ming Tseng*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS39762USA
*
Author for correspondence: Te-Ming Tseng, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS39762. Email: t.tseng@msstate.edu

Abstract

Safeners have been widely used to reduce phytotoxicity to crops, thus serving as an alternative weed control strategy. Benoxacor and fenclorim safeners have the potential to protect plants from herbicide phytotoxicity by increasing glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity within the plant. The study aimed to evaluate the safening effect of benoxacor and fenclorim on tomato against selected herbicides applied POST. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse in a completely randomized designed with four replications in a 9 × 3 factorial scheme, where Factor A consisted of eight herbicides including a nontreated control, and Factor B consisted of two safeners including a nontreated control. The herbicide treatments were sulfentrazone (0.220 kg ai ha−1), fomesafen (0.280 kg ai ha−1), flumioxazin (0.070 kg ai ha−1), linuron (1.200 kg ai ha−1), metribuzin (0.840 kg ai ha−1), pyroxasulfone (0.220 kg ai ha−1), and bicyclopyrone (0.040 kg ai ha−1). Safener treatments consisted of benoxacor (0.67 g L−1) and fenclorim (10 µM). Tomato seeds were immersed in safener solution before sowing and herbicides were applied when tomato plants were at the 3-leaf stage, or 25 days after sowing. Visible injury was scored at 3, 7, 14, and 21 d after application (DAA), and shoot biomass was recorded 21 DAA. Seed treatment with fenclorim reduced injury caused by imazamox and bicyclopyrone by 5.5 and 1.3 times, respectively, whereas benoxacor reduced the injury from bicyclopyrone 1.3 times. In addition, tomato plants pretreated with fenclorim showed a lesser reduction in biomass after application of imazamox, fomesafen, and metribuzin, whereas plants pretreated with benoxacor showed lesser biomass reduction after metribuzin application. Thus, the use of safeners promotes greater crop selectivity, allowing the application of herbicides with different mechanisms of action on the crop.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Darren Robinson, University of Guelph

References

Bertucci, MB, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Jordan, DL, Schultheis, JR, Louws, FJ, Waldschmidt, MD (2018) Effect of bicyclopyrone on triploid watermelon in plasticulture. Weed Technol 32:439443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, RE (1998) Postemergence weed control in pea (Pisum sativum) with imazamox. Weed Technol 12:6468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, AM (1979) The interaction of protectants with EPTC on field bean and triallate on wheat. Ann Appl Biol 6:105109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, JA, Oliver, LR, Stephenson, DO (2006) Response of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions to glyphosate, fomesafen and pyrithiobac. Weed Technol 20:885892 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhari, S, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Jordan, DL, Gunter, CC, Louws, FJ (2015) Response of grafted tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) to herbicides. Weed Technol 29:800809 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranmer, JR, Altom, JV, Braun, JC, Pawlak, JA (2000) Valor herbicide: a new herbicide for weed control in cotton, peanuts, soybeans, and sugarcane. Page 158 in Proceedings of the 53rd Southern Weed Science Society Meeting. Tulsa, OK: Weed Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
DeRidder, BP, Dixon, DP, Beussman, DJ, Edwards, R, Goldsbrough, PB (2002) Induction of glutathione S-transferases in Arabidopsis by herbicide safeners. Plant Physiol 130:497505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y, Li, C, Zhang, Y, He, Q, Daud, MK, Chen, J, Zhu, S (2016) Glutathione S-transferase gene family in Gossypium raimondii and G. arboreum: comparative genomic study and their expression under salt stress. Front Plant Sci 7:139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuerst, EP, Irzyk, GP, Miller, KD (1993) Partial characterization of glutathione S-transferase isozymes induced by the herbicide safener benoxacor in maize. Plant Physiol 102:795802 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galon, L, Maciel, CD, Agostinetto, D, Concenço, G, Moraes, PV (2011) Selectivity of herbicides to crops by using chemical safeners. Rev Bras Herbicidas 10:291304 Google Scholar
Geier, PW, Stahlman, PW, Frihauf, JC (2006) KIH-485 and S-metolachlor efficacy comparisons in conventional and no-tillage corn. Weed Technol 20:622626 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenni, P, Caracciolo, AB, Rodríguez-Cruz, MS, Sánchez-Martín, MJ (2009) Changes in the microbial activity in a soil amended with oak and pine residues and treated with linuron herbicide. Appl Soil Ecol 41:27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, WJ, Besler, BA, Brewer, KD (2003) Purple nutsedge control and potato (Solanum tuberosum) tolerance to sulfentrazone and halosulfuron. Weed Technol 17:485490 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, G, Guan, CN, Chen, QX, Gou, XJ, Liu, W, Zeng, QY, Lan, T (2016) Genome-wide analysis of the glutathione S-transferase gene family in Capsella rubella: identification, expression, and biochemical functions. Front Plant Sci 7:1325 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, S, Rahman, IA, Islam, T, Ghosh, A (2017) Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of glutathione S-transferase gene family in tomato: Gaining an insight to their physiological and stress-specific roles. PLoS One 12:128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karavangeli, M, Labrou, NE, Clonis, YD, Tsaftaris, A (2005) Development of transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing maize glutathione S-transferase I for chloroacetanilide herbicides phytoremediation. Biomol Eng 22:121128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knerr, LD, Hopen, HJ (1989) Naptalam as a safener against chloramben in cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Weed Technol 3:445449 Google Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW (2017) Sweetpotato tolerance and Palmer amaranth control with metribuzin and oryzalin. Weed Technol 31:903907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, MR, Dittmar, PJ (2014) Effect of PRE and POST-directed herbicides for season-long nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) control in bell pepper. Weed Technol 28:518526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales-Payan, JP, Stall, WM, Shilling, DG, Charudattan, R, Dusky, JA, Bewick, TA (2003) Above-and belowground interference of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) with tomato. Weed Sci 51:181185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, KA, Renner, KA (1998) Weed control in wide- and narrow-row soybean (Glycine max) with imazamox, imazethapyr, and CGA277476 plus quizalofop. Weed Technol 12:137144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormeño, JN, Fuentes, FV, Soffia, VC (2003) Tolerancia del tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) a aplicaciones post trasplante del herbicida halosulfuron-metil. Agr Tec 63:125134 Google Scholar
Phatak, SC, Varvina, CD (1989) Growth regulators, fungicides, and agrochemicals safeners. Pages 299315 in Hatzios, KK, Hoagland, RE. eds. Crop Safeners for Herbicides: Development, Uses and Mechanisms of Action. New York: Academic Press CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rezaei, MK, Shobbar, ZS, Shahbazi, M, Abedini, R, Zare, S (2013) Glutathione S-transferase (GST) family in barley: identification of members, enzyme activity, and gene expression pattern. J Plant Physiol 170:12771284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riechers, DE, Kreuz, K, Zhang, Q (2010) Detoxification without intoxication: herbicide safeners activate plant defense gene expression. Plant Physiol 153:313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronchi, CP, Serrano, LAL, Silva, AA, Guimarães, OR (2010) Weed management in tomato. Planta Daninha 28:215228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sappl, PG, Carroll, AJ, Clifton, R, Lister, R, Whelan, J, Harvey Millar, A, Singh, KB (2009) The Arabidopsis glutathione transferase gene family displays complex stress regulation and co-silencing multiple genes results in altered metabolic sensitivity to oxidative stress. Plant J 58:5368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, X, Gao, X, Eneji, AE, Chen, Y (2013) Chemical control of weedy rice in precise hill-direct-seeded rice in South China. Weed Biol Manag 13:3943 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, BP, Almeida, RO, Salgado, TP, Alves, PL (2014) Efficacy of imazapic, halosulfuron and sulfentrazone for Cyperus rotundus L. control in response to weed tuber density. Afr J Agr Res 9:34583464 Google Scholar
Stall, WM, Morales-Payan, JP (2003) The critical period of nutsedge interference in tomato. www.imok.ufl.eduliv/groups/IPM/weed_con/nutsedge.htm. Accessed: September 16, 2019Google Scholar
Steele, GL, Porpiglia, PJ, Chandler, JM (2005) Efficacy of KIH-485 on Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) and selected broadleaf weeds in corn. Weed Technol 19:866869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] US Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistics Service (2012) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
[USDA] US Department of Agriculture–National Agricultural Statistics Service (2016) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of AgricultureGoogle Scholar
Weaver, SE, Tan, CS (1983) Critical period of weed interference in transplanted tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum): growth analysis. Weed Sci 31:476481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J, Omokawa, H, Hatzios, K (1996) Glutathione S-transferase activity in unsafened and fenclorim-safened rice (Oryza sativa). Pestic Biochem Phys 54:220229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Q, Liu, YJ, Zeng, QY (2014) Biochemical functions of the glutathione transferase supergene family of Larix kaempferi . Plant Physiol Bioch 77:99107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, RC (2010) Towards understanding and use of mixed-model analysis of agricultural experiments. Can J Plant Sci 90:605627 Google Scholar
Yazbek, W Jr, Foloni, LL (2004) Effect of the seed’s protector on herbicide selectivity cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) culture. Ecossistema 29:3338 Google Scholar