Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:52:47.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Adjuvants and Bromoxynil on Absorption of Clethodim

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. Stanley Culpepper ,
David L. Jordan ,
Alan C. York ,
Frederick T. Corbin  and
Yvonna Sheldon
A. Stanley Culpepper
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Alan C. York
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Frederick T. Corbin
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Yvonna Sheldon
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of nonionic surfactant, crop oil concentrate, organosilicone surfactant, methylated seed oil, and a blend of organosilicone surfactant and methylated seed oil on absorption of 14C-clethodim was evaluated in barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli). Absorption of 14C-label was greatest during the first 40 min after application when 14C-clethodim was applied with methylated seed oil or a blend of methylated seed oil and organosilicone surfactant. These adjuvants increased the rate of absorption more than crop oil concentrate, organosilicone surfactant, or nonionic surfactant. Crop oil concentrate was more effective than organosilicone or nonionic surfactant in increasing absorption, with nonionic surfactant being more effective than organosilicone surfactant. These results generally agreed with the order of increasing efficacy of clethodim on barnyardgrass as affected by adjuvants in field experiments. Another study was conducted to determine the effect of bromoxynil on absorption and translocation of 14C-clethodim in yellow foxtail (Setaria glauca). Bromoxynil reduced absorption of 14C–clethodim 4, 8, and 24 h after application and also reduced the amount of 14C-label translocated from the treated leaf. These data suggest that antagonism of clethodim control of yellow foxtail by bromoxynil observed in previous research can be attributed partially to decreased absorption and translocation of clethodim.

Keywords

Bromoxynil, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrileclethodim, (E,E)-(±)-2-[1-[[(3-chloro-2-propenyl)oxy]imino]propyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onebarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCGyellow foxtail, Setaria glauca (L.) Beauv. # SETLUAdjuvant blendantagonismcrop oil concentratecyclohexanedione herbicidemethylated seed oilnonionic surfactantorganosilicone surfactantpesticide interactionECHCGSETLUCOC, crop oil concentrateLSS, liquid scintillation spectrometryMSO, methylated seed oilMSO/OSL, blend of methylated seed oil and organosilicone surfactantNIS, nonionic surfactantOSL, organosilicone surfactant
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 536 - 541
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Current address of first author: Georgia Cooperative Extension Service, Rural Development Center, P.O. Box 1209, Tifton, GA 31793.

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. 1994. Herbicide Handbook, 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 352 p.Google Scholar
Burton, J. D. 1997. Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors. In Roe, R. M., Burton, J. D., and Kuhr, J., eds. Herbicide Activity: Toxicology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Washington, DC: IOS Press. pp. 187–205 Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R. and Penner, D. 1985. Abiotic transformations of sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 33:435–439.Google Scholar
Corkern, C. B., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., and Jordan, D. L. 1998, Bromoxynil antagonizes johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control by graminicides. Weed Technol. 12:205–208.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Jennings, K. M., and Batts, R. B. 1998. Interaction of bromoxynil and postemergence graminicides in large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), Weed Technol. 12:554–559.Google Scholar
Davis, G. D., Mullins, J. S., Stolzenberg, G. E., and Booth, G. D. 1979. Permeation of organic molecules of widely differing solubilities and of water through isolated cuticles of orange leaves. Pestic. Sci. 10:19–31.Google Scholar
Falb, L. N., Bridges, D. C., and Smith, A. E. Jr. 1990. Effects of adjuvants and pH on clethodim photodegradation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 38:875–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentsh, B. J. 1986. Efficacy, Behavior, and Fate of Bromoxynil and Photo-synthetic Electron Transport Inhibition by Bromoxynil Following Application in Overhead Irrigation Water. Ph.D. dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrichemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
Holshouser, D. H. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:128–133.Google Scholar
Hull, H. M., Davis, D. G., and Stolzenberg, G. E. 1982. Action of adjuvants on plant surfaces. In Hodgson, R. H., ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 26–67.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., and Corbin, F. T. 1989. Effect of ammonium sulfate and bentazon on sethoxydim absorption. Weed Technol. 3:674–677.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., and Reynolds, D. B. 1996. Influence of adjuvants on efficacy of clethodim. Weed Technol. 10:738–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, P. C. Markstadter, and Riederer, M. 1997. Attenuation of UV radiation by plant cuticles from woody species. Plant Ceil Environ. 20:1079–1085.Google Scholar
Mack, R. E., Volgas, G. C., and Underwood, A. K. 1995. New developments in spray adjuvant technology. In Proc. Southern Soybean Conf. February 15–17, 1995. Memphis, TN. The United Soybean Board. pp. 126–129.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1982. The use of adjuvants. In Hodgson, R. H., ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 11–25.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Ouzts, C. 1994. Leaf surface morphology of Erythroxylum sp. and droplet spread. Weed Sci. 42:18–26.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989a. Identification of efficacious adjuvants for sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Technol. 3:60–66.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989b. Foliar penetration of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:215–231.Google Scholar
Wilhm, J. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1986. Effect of acifluorfen and bentazon on absorption and translocation of haloxyfop and DPX-Y6202 in quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 34:333–337.Google Scholar