Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:08:26.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Adjuvants on Efficacy of Clethodim

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Jordan ,
P. Roy Vidrine ,
James L. Griffin  and
Daniel B. Reynolds
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Northeast Res. Stn., P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
P. Roy Vidrine
Affiliation:
Dean Lee Res. Stn., Alexandria, LA 71302
James L. Griffin
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. and Crop Physiol., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Daniel B. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Northeast Res. Stn., St. Joseph, LA 71366
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments evaluated barnyardgrass, broadleaf signalgrass, and rhizomatous johnsongrass control with clethodim applied with Agri-Dex® crop oil concentrate at 1.0% v/v, the adjuvant Dash® at 1.0% v/v, the methylated seed oil Sun-It II® at 1.0% v/v, a blend of silicone surfactant plus methylated seed oil (Dyne-Amic® at 0.5% v/v) or nonionic surfactant (Kinetic® HV at 0.125% v/v), two silicone surfactants (Sylgard® 309 and Silwet L-77® surfactant) at 0.125% v/v, two other conventional nonionic surfactants (Latron AG-98™ and Induce®) at 0.25% v/v, and the acidified soya phospholipid LI-700®. When compared with the conventional nonionic or silicone-based surfactants and LI-700, clethodim at 70 g ai/ha controlled barnyardgrass more effectively when applied with Dash or Sun-It II. Broadleaf signalgrass and rhizomatous johnsongrass were controlled more effectively when clethodim was applied with Agri-Dex, Dash, Sun-It II, or Dyne-Amic. Clethodim at 70 g/ha applied with Dash or Sun-It II controlled grasses equally or greater than clethodim at 140 g/ha.

Keywords

Clethodim, (E,E)-(±)-2-[1-[[(3-chloro-2-propenyl)oxy]imino]propyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onebarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCGbroadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash # BRAPPjohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. # SORHAAcidified soya phospholipidcrop oil concentratemethylated seed oilnonionic surfactantsilicone surfactantBrachiaria platyphyllaEchinochloa crus-galliSorghum halepenseBRAPPECHCGSORHA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 738 - 743
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Braverman, M. P. and Griffin, J. L. 1995. Effect of CO2 on spray solution pH. Weed Technol. 9:23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bridges, D. C. 1989. Adjuvant and pH effects on sethoxydim and clethodim activity on rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol. 3:615–620.Google Scholar
3. Eberlein, C. V., Guttieri, M. J., and Schaffers, W. C. 1992. Hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with bentazon plus additives. Weed Technol. 6:85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Field, R. J. and Bishop, N. C. 1988. Promotion of stomatal infiltration of glyphosate by an organosilicone surfactant reduces the critical rainfree period. Pestic. Sci. 24:55–62.Google Scholar
5. Harker, K. N. 1992. Effects of various adjuvants on sethoxydim activity. Weed Technol. 6:865–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hart, S. E., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1992. Influence of adjuvants on efficacy, absorption, and spray retention of primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:592–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrichemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
8. Holshouser, D. L. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:128–133.Google Scholar
9. Jansen, L. L. 1973. Enhancement of herbicides by silicone surfactants. Weed Sci. 21:130–135.Google Scholar
10. Kent, L. M., Wills, G. D., and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Influence of ammonium sulfate, imazapyr, temperature, and relative humidity on the absorption and translocation of imazethapyr. Weed Sci. 39:412–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Klingaman, T. E., King, C. A., and Oliver, L. R. 1992. Effect of application rate, weed species, and weed stage of growth on imazethapyr activity. Weed Sci. 40:227–232.Google Scholar
12. Mack, R. E., Volgas, G. C., and Underwood, A. K. 1995. New developments in spray adjuvant technology. p. 126–129 in Proc. South. Soybean Conf. Feb. 15–17, 1995. Memphis, TN. The United Soybean Board.Google Scholar
13. McCormick, R. W. 1990. Effect of CO2, N2, air, and nitrogen salts on spray solution pH. Weed Technol. 4:910–912.Google Scholar
14. McWhorter, C. G. 1992. The use of adjuvants. p. 10–25 in Hodgson, R. H., ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
15. Reddy, K. N. and Singh, M. 1992. Organosilicone adjuvant effects on glyphosate efficacy and rainfastness. Weed Technol. 6:361–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Roggenbuck, F. C., Rowe, L., Penner, D., Petroff, L., and Burow, R. 1990. Increasing postemergence herbicide efficacy and rainfastness with silicone adjuvants. Weed Technol. 4:576–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Van Valkenburg, J. W. 1982. Terminology, classification, and chemistry. p. 1–3 in Hodgson, R. H., ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
18. Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar penetration of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:215–231.Google Scholar
19. York, A. C., Jordan, D. L., and Wilcut, J. W. 1990. Effects of (NH4),SO4 and BCH 81508 S on efficacy of sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 4:76–80.Google Scholar