Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T11:56:15.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Norflurazon Placement on Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Henry S. McLean ,
John S. Richburg III ,
John W. Wilcut  and
Albert E. Smith
Henry S. McLean
Affiliation:
Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Box 748, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793-0748
John S. Richburg III
Affiliation:
Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Box 748, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793-0748
John W. Wilcut*
Affiliation:
Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Box 748, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793-0748
Albert E. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: john_wilcut@ncsu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse studies were conducted to determine yellow nutsedge response to selective placement of a 5-cm layer of norflurazon-treated soil above, below, or above plus below pregerminated nutsedge tubers. Norflurazon at 1.68 kg ai/ha applied postemergence (POST) as a foliar, soil, or foliar plus soil treatment was also evaluated. Soil concentrations of norflurazon at 1.5 mg/kg (w/w) applied below or above plus below nutsedge tubers reduced yellow nutsedge shoot numbers at least 69%, shoot height at least 71%, shoot dry weights at least 77%, and root tuber dry weights at least 89%. Yellow nutsedge growth reduction with norflurazon was greatest when norflurazon was placed in the soil profile below or above plus below the yellow nutsedge tubers. Placement of norflurazon above yellow nutsedge tubers did not reduce shoot number, height, or dry weight until the foliar portion of plants were removed 39 d after treatment. POST application of norflurazon did not reduce initial yellow nutsedge shoot number regardless of application method. Foliar-only POST application of norflurazon was less effective for reducing numbers of emerged yellow nutsedge than application to soil only or soil plus foliage.

Keywords

Norflurazonyellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. #3 CYPESApplication methodherbicide placementtimingherbicide concentrationcottonGossypium hirsutum.DAT, days after treatmentPOST, postemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 327 - 331
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1999. Zorial herbicide product label. Greensboro, NC: Novartis Crop Protection.Google Scholar
Armstrong, T. F., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1973. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of alachlor by yellow nutsedge. Weed Sci. 21: 357–360.Google Scholar
Baird, J. H., Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Dickens, R., and Sharpe, S. 1989. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of sulfometuron in centipedegrass (Eremochloa ophiuroides) and bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum). Weed Sci. 37: 42–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, P. A. 1983. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control, regrowth, and tuber production as affected by herbicides. Weed Sci. 31: 419–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, J. D. Jr. 1996. Report of the 1995 cotton weed loss committee. In Dugger, P. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, Nashville, TN. January 9-12, 1996. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America. pp. 1513–1516.Google Scholar
Cornelius, A. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1985. Activity of acetanilide herbicides on yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 33: 721–723.Google Scholar
Dixon, G. A. and Stoller, E. W. 1982. Differential toxicity, absorption, translocation, and metabolism of metolachlor in corn (Zea mays) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 30: 225–230.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1995. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 290–325.Google Scholar
Monks, C. D., Patterson, M. G., Wilcut, J. W., and Delaney, D. P. 1999. Effects of pyrithiobac, MSMA, and DSMA on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) growth and weed control. Weed Technol. 13: 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandihalli, U. B. and Bendixen, L. E. 1988. Toxicity and site of uptake of soil-applied imazaquin in yellow and purple nutsedges (Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus). Weed Sci. 36: 411–416.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Bendixen, L. E. 1989. Toxicity, absorption, and translocation of soil-applied chlorimuron in yellow and purple nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus). Weed Sci. 37: 147–151.Google Scholar
Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Wehtje, G. R. 1993. Toxicity of imazethapyr to purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 7: 900–905.Google Scholar
Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Wehtje, G. R. 1994. Toxicity of AC 263,222 to purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (C. esculentus). Weed Sci. 42: 398–402.Google Scholar
Rincon, D. J. and Warren, G. F. 1979. Effect of soil placement on the activity of herbicides on Cyperus rotundus L. Weed Res. 19: 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciumbato, A. S., Prostko, E. P., Chandler, J. M., and Smith, K. L. 1997. Norflurazon in new weed management programs for cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:56.Google Scholar
Shankle, M. W., Hayes, R. M., Reich, V. H., and Mueller, T. C. 1996. MSMA and pyrithiobac effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development, yield, and quality. Weed Sci. 44: 137–142.Google Scholar
Snipes, C. E. and Byrd, J. D. Jr. 1994. Influence of fluometuron and MSMA on cotton yield and fruiting characteristics. Weed Sci. 42: 210–215.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W. 1998. Influence of pyrithiobac sodium on purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (C. esculentus). Weed Sci. 46: 111–115.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W. and Richburg, J. S. III. 1995. Is Staple a nutsedge herbicide? In Richter, D. A. and Armour, J., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. January 5-8, 1994. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Cotton Council of America. p. 600.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Jordan, D. L. 1995. Weed management systems for oil seed crops. In Smith, A. E., ed. Handbook of Weed Management Systems. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 343–400.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Jordan, D. L., Vencill, W. K., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1997. Weed management in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with soil-applied and postdirected herbicides. Weed Technol. 11: 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Bridges, D. C., and McLean, H. S. 1998. Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) management in continuous cotton with Zorial-based systems. In Dugger, P. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Diego, CA. January 5-9, 1998. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America. pp. 872–873.Google Scholar
York, A. C. 1994. Nutsedge management in cotton. In Herber, D. J. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Diego, CA. January 5-8, 1994. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America. p. 1698.Google Scholar
York, A. C. and Culpepper, A. S. 1999. Weed management in cotton. In Edmisten, K. L., ed. 1999 Cotton Information. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Publ. AG-417.Google Scholar