Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:33:33.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inheritance of resistance and response of Provisia™ rice to quizalofop-p-ethyl under U.S. field conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2019

Jose R. Camacho*
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Student, H. Rouse Caffey Rice Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Rayne, LA, USA
Steve D. Linscombe
Affiliation:
Professor, H. Rouse Caffey Rice Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Rayne, LA, USA
Eric P. Webster
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
James H. Oard
Affiliation:
Professor, H. Rouse Caffey Rice Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Rayne, LA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Jose R. Camacho, H. Rouse Caffey Rice Research Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 1373 Caffey Road, Rayne, LA70578. Email: roberto.camacho1986@gmail.com

Abstract

Provisia™ rice was developed recently by the BASF Corporation for control of grass weeds and is complementary to existing Clearfield® technology. Our previous research showed that resistance of Provisia™ rice to the acetyl coenzyme-A carboxylase herbicide quizalofop-p-ethyl (QPE) in laboratory and greenhouse environments is governed by a single dominant Mendelian gene. However, these results may not be consistent in different populations or field environments. Therefore, the first objective of the current research is to determine the inheritance of resistance to QPE in rice using different segregating populations evaluated under U.S. field environments. The second objective is to evaluate the response of QPE-resistant breeding lines to various herbicide concentrations at two U.S. locations. Chi-square tests of 12 F2 populations evaluated in Louisiana during 2014 and 2015 indicated that QPE seedling resistance at 240 g ai ha−1 was governed by a single dominant Mendelian gene with no observable maternal effects. Similar results were obtained in five F3 populations derived from the aforementioned F2 populations. Allele-specific SNP markers for QPE resistance also followed Mendelian segregation in the five F2 populations. For the second objective, six QPE-resistant inbred lines showed transient leaf injury at 1× (120 g ai ha−1) or 2× (240 g ai ha−1) field rates 7 and 21 d after treatment (DAT). However, a trend of reduced injury (recovery) from 7 through 33 DAT was observed for all breeding material. No differences in grain yield were found between untreated QPE-resistant lines and those treated with 1× or 2× QPE field rate. Single gene inheritance and good levels of QPE herbicide field resistance in different genetic populations suggest feasibility for rapid and effective development of new QPE-resistant varieties and effective stewardship of the Provisia™ technology.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: David Johnson, Corteva Agriscience

References

BASF (2017a) Get the Most Out of Every Clearfield® Rice Acre. http://www.horizonseed.com/horizon/pdf/variety-downloads/BASF-2017-CL-Rice-Stewardship-Guidelines.pdf. Accessed: April 15, 2019Google Scholar
BASF (2017b) BASF Introduces the Provisia™ Rice System. https://www.basf.com/us/en/company/news-and-media/news-releases/2017/05/P-US-17-054.html. Accessed April 15, 2019Google Scholar
Blanche, SB, Linscombe, SD, Sha, XY, Bearb, KF, Groth, DE, White, LM, Harrell, DL (2009) Registration of ‘Catahoula’ rice. J Plant Regist 3:146149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, NR, Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC, Smith, KL (2008) Red rice (Oryza sativa) status after 5 years of imidazolinone-resistant rice technology in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:200208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camacho, JR, Linscombe, SD, Sanabria, Y, Mosquera, P, Oard, JH (2019) Inheritance of Provisia™ rice resistance to quizalofop-p-ethyl under laboratory and greenhouse environments. Euphytica 215:83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2407-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croughan, TP (2015) Resistance to acetohydroxyacid synthase-inhibiting herbicides. U.S. Patent 9,090,904Google Scholar
Delouche, JC, Burgos, NR, Gealy, DR, Zorrilla, G, Labrada, R (2007) Weedy rices: origin, biology, ecology and control. Vol. 188. Rome: Food and Agriculture OrganizationGoogle Scholar
Délye, C, Zhang, XQ, Michel, S, Matéjicek, A, Powles, SB (2005) Molecular bases for sensitivity to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors in black-grass. Plant Phys 137:794806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2407-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrell, DL (2018) Louisiana Rice Acreage by Variety. https://www.lsuagcenter.com/topics/crops/rice/statistics/rice-varieties. Accessed April 15, 2019Google Scholar
Linscombe, SD, Jodari, F, Bollich, PK, Groth, DE, White, LM, Chu, QR, Dunand, RT, Sanders, DE (2000) Registration of ‘Cocodrie’ Rice. Crop Sci 40:294294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linscombe, SD, Jodari, F, McKenzie, KS, Bollich, PK, White, LM, Groth, DE, Dunand, TT (1993) Registration of ‘Cypress’ rice. Crop Sci 33:355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linscombe, SD, Sha, XY, Bearb, KF, Chu, QR, Groth, DE, White, LM, Dunand, RT, Bollich, PK (2006) Registration of ‘Cheniere’ rice. Crop Sci 46:18141815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linscombe, SD (2017) Provisia™ Rice Will Be Valuable for the Louisiana Rice Industry. http://www.lsuagcenter.com/profiles/vdartez/articles/page1505744457923. Accessed April 15, 2019Google Scholar
Mankin, S, Schofl, U, Hong, HP, Wenck, A, Neuteboom, L, Whitt, S, Carlson, DR (2014) Herbicide-tolerant plants. US Patent 20140045686Google Scholar
Oard, JH, Harrell, DL, Groth, DE, Bearb, KF, White, LM, Linscombe, SD (2014a) Registration of ‘Mermentau’ Rice. J Plant Regist 8:135138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oard, JH, Harrell, DL, Groth, DE, Bearb, KF, White, LM, Linscombe, SD (2014b) Registration of ‘CL111’rice. J Plant Regist 8:5810.3198/jpr2013.06.0035crcCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oard, JH, Harrell, DL, Groth, DE, Bearb, KF, White, LM, Linscombe, SD (2014c) Registration of ‘CL152’rice. J Plant Regist 8:912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, LE, Lozano, I, Garavito, A, Carabali, SJ, Triana, M, Villareal, N, Reyes, L, Duque, MC, Martinez, CP, Calvert, L, Lorieux, M (2014) Major QTLs control resistance to rice hoja blanca virus and its vector Tagosodes orizicolus. G3 (Bethesda) 4:133142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shivrain, VK, Burgos, NR, Anders, MM, Rajguru, SN, Moore, J, Sales, MA (2007) Gene flow between Clearfield™ rice and red rice. Crop Prot 26:349356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr (1988) Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice, Oryza sativa. Weed Technol 2:232241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, S, Evans, RR, Dahmer, ML, Singh, BK, Shaner, DL (2005) Imidazolinone-tolerant crops: history, current status and future. Pest Manag Sci 61:246257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, WQ, Linscombe, SD, Webster, E, Tan, SY, Oard, JH (2006) Risk assessment of the transfer of imazethapyr herbicide tolerance from Clearfield® rice to red rice (Oryza sativa). Euphytica 152:7586CrossRefGoogle Scholar