Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:32:50.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Insect and Weed Interactions on Bell Peppers (Capsicum annuum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. Ray Prank ,
Paul H. Schwartz Jr.  and
John B. Bourke
J. Ray Prank
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Ft. Detrick, Bldg. 1301, Frederick, MD 21701
Paul H. Schwartz Jr.
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Beltsville, MD 20705
John B. Bourke
Affiliation:
Agric. Chem. Pestic., N.Y. State Agric. Exp. Stn., Cornell Univ., Geneva, NY 14456
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two years of field research were conducted to determine the additive effects of weed cover and insects on pepper production. When weeds covered less than 10% of test plots, the natural insect populations reduced the marketable fruit yield of bell peppers 32% in 1983 and 22% in 1984. When weeds covered 72 or 94% of the test plots, foliage damage due to insects was from 5.8 to 12.1%, respectively. The high percent weed cover and insects reduced yield 99%. The average fresh weight of pepper foliage approached zero as weed cover approached maximum. Foliar levels of iron and aluminum were reduced greatly in peppers grown in competition with a 100% weed cover. The level of boron, copper, phosphorus, and potassium in pepper foliage increased as percent weed cover increased.

Keywords

Bell pepperCapsicum annuum L. cv. Yolo WonderTrifluralinglyphosateinsect population densityweed population densityiron deficiency
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , October 1988 , pp. 423 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Am. Assoc. Anal. Chem. 1984. Methods of Analysis, 14th Ed. (7.021–7.024), p. 154.Google Scholar
2. Baltajar, A. M., Monaco, T. J., and Peek, D. M. 1984. Bentazon selectivity in hot pepper (Capsicum chinense) and sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum). Weed Sci. 32:243–246.Google Scholar
3. Barnes, J. P., and Putnam, A. P. 1986. Evidence for allelopathy by residues and aqueous extracts of rye (Secale cereale). Weed Sci. 34:384–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Batal, K. M., and Smittle, D. A. 1981. Response of bell pepper to irrigation, nitrogen, and plant population. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:259–262.Google Scholar
5. Bendixen, L. E., Kim, K. W., Kozok, C. M., and Horn, D. J. 1981. An annotated bibliography of weeds as reservoirs for organisms affecting crops. Ha. Arthropods. Ohio Agric. Res. Dev. Entomol. Res. Bull. No. 1125.Google Scholar
6. Brindley, T. A., Sparks, A. N., Showers, W. B., and Guthrie, W. D. 1975. Recent research advances on the European corn borer in North America. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 20:221–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Chandler, J. M., Hamill, A. S., and Thomas, A. G. 1984. Crop losses due to weeds in Canada and the United States. Special Report of the Losses Due to Weeds Committee. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., 309 W. Clark St., Champaign, IL 61820.Google Scholar
8. Dupree, M., Dempsey, A. H., Beshear, R., and Tippins, H. H. 1979. Observations on the European corn borer in Georgia peppers. Ga. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. 318.Google Scholar
9. Eshel, Y., Katan, J., and Palevitch, D. 1973. Selective action of diphenamid and napropamide in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) and weeds. Weed Res. 13:379–384.Google Scholar
10. Glaze, N. C., and Phatak, S. C. 1981. Herbicide evaluation in direct-seeded peppers for transplant production. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:112–121.Google Scholar
11. Hofmaster, R. N., Bray, D. F., and Ditman, L. P. 1960. Effectiveness of insecticides against the European corn borer and green peach aphid on peppers. J. Econ. Entomol. 53:624–626.Google Scholar
12. Locascio, S. J., Fiskell, J.G.A., and Martin, F. G. 1981. Responses of bell pepper to nitrogen sources. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:628–632.Google Scholar
13. Miller, C. H. 1961. Some effects of different levels of five nutrient elements on bell peppers. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 77:440–448.Google Scholar
14. Miller, C. H., McCollium, R. E., and Claimon, S. 1979. Relationships between growth of bell peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) and nutrient accumulation during ontogeny in field environments. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 104:852–857.Google Scholar
15. Rufner, R., and Barker, A. V. 1984. Ultrastructure of zinc-induced iron deficiency in mesophyll chloroplasts of spinach and tomato. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 109:164–168.Google Scholar
16. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 edition. 1985. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
17. Taylor, L. R. 1961. Aggregation, variance, and the mean. Nature 189(4766):732–735.Google Scholar
18. van Emden, H. F., Eustop, V. F., Huges, R. D., and Way, M. J. 1969. The ecology of Myzus persicae . Annu. Rev. Entomol. 14:197–276.Google Scholar
19. Watson, M. A., and Plumb, R. T. 1972. Transmisstion of plant-pathogenic viruses by aphids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 17:425–452.Google Scholar
20. Weinbaum, Z., and Milbrath, G. M. 1976. The isolation of tobacco vetch viruses from bell pepper and weeds in southern Illinois. Plant Dis. Rep. 60(6):469–471.Google Scholar
21. Welker, W. V. 1981. A self-feeding, hand-held herbicide wiper. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:345–346.Google Scholar
22. Zitter, T. A., and Ozaki, H. Y. 1978. Aphid-borne vegetable viruses controlled with oil sprays. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 91:287–289.Google Scholar