Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:08:15.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrated Management of Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) with Tillage and Herbicides in Soybean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Zahoor A. Ganie ,
Lowell D. Sandell ,
Mithila Jugulam ,
Greg R. Kruger ,
David B. Marx  and
Amit J. Jhala
Zahoor A. Ganie
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Lowell D. Sandell
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Mithila Jugulam
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Greg R. Kruger
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, West Central Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, NE 69101
David B. Marx
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583
Amit J. Jhala*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: Amit.Jhala@unl.edu.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Giant ragweed is one of the most competitive annual broadleaf weeds in soybean production fields in the midwestern United States and eastern Canada because of its early emergence, rapid growth rate, high plasticity, and resistance to glyphosate and acetolactate synthase inhibitors. Therefore, early-season management of giant ragweed is critical to avoid yield loss. The objectives of this study were to evaluate control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed through the integration of preplant tillage or 2,4-D; PRE or early POST (EPOST) followed by (fb) late POST (LPOST) herbicide programs with or without preplant tillage or 2,4-D; and their effect on soybean injury and yield. A field study was conducted in 2013 and 2014 in David City, NE in a field infested with glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed. Preplant tillage or 2,4-D application provided > 90% control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed 14 d after preplant treatment. Giant ragweed control and biomass reduction were consistently > 90% with preplant tillage or 2,4-D fb sulfentrazone plus cloransulam PRE or glyphosate plus cloransulam EPOST fb glyphosate plus fomesafen or lactofen LPOST compared with ≤ 86% control with same treatments without preplant tillage or 2,4-D. PRE or EPOST fb LPOST herbicide programs preceded by preplant treatments resulted in giant ragweed density < 2 plants m−2 and soybean yield > 2,400 kg ha−1 compared with the density of ≥ 2 plants m−2 and soybean yield < 1,800 kg ha−1 under PRE or EPOST fb LPOST herbicide programs. The contrast analysis also indicated that preplant tillage or 2,4-D fb a PRE or POST program was more effective for giant ragweed management compared with PRE fb POST herbicide programs. Integration of preplant tillage would provide an alternative method for early-season control of giant ragweed; however, a follow up application of herbicides is needed for season-long control in soybean.

Ambrosia trifida es una de las malezas de hoja ancha más competitivas en campos de producción de soja en el centro-oeste de los Estados Unidos y en el este de Canada debido a su emergencia temprana, alta tasa crecimiento, alta plasticidad, y resistencia a glyphosate e inhibidores de acetolactate synthase. Por esta razón, el manejo de A. trifida, temprano durante la temporada de crecimiento, es crítico para evitar las pérdidas de rendimiento. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron evaluar el control de A. trifida resistente a glyphosate mediante la integración de labranza en pre-siembra o 2,4-D; aplicaciones PRE o POST temprana (EPOST) seguido por (fb) programas de herbicidas en POST tardía (LPOST) con o sin labranza en pre-siembra o 2,4-D; y su efecto sobre el daño y rendimiento de la soja. Se realizó un estudio de campo en 2013 y 2014 en David City, Nebraska en un campo infestado con A. trifida resistente a glyphosate. La labranza en pre-siembra o la aplicación de 2,4-D brindó >90% de control de A. trifida resistente a glyphosate 14 d después del tratamiento pre-siembra. El control y la reducción en la biomasa de A. trifida fueron >90% consistentemente con la labranza pre-siembra o 2,4-D fb sulfentrazone más cloransulam PRE o glyphosate más cloransulam EPOST fb glyphosate más fomesafen o lactofen POST al compararlo con ≤86% de control con los mismos tratamientos sin labranza pre-siembra o 2,4-D. Programas de herbicidas PRE o de EPOST fb LPOST precedidos por tratamientos pre-siembra resultaron en una densidad de A. trifida <2 plantas m−2 y un rendimiento de soja >2,400 kg ha−1 al compararse con la densidad de ≥2 plantas m−2 y un rendimiento de soja ≤1,800 kg ha−1 con programas de herbicidas PRE o EPOST fb LPOST. El análisis de contrastes también indicó que la labranza pre-siembra o 2,4-D fb de un programa PRE o POST fue más efectiva para el manejo de A. trifida al compararse con programas de herbicidas PRE fb POST. La integración de labranza pre-siembra brindaría una alternativa de manejo para el control de A. trifida, temprano en la temporada. Sin embargo, se requiere que a esto le siga una aplicación de herbicidas para obtener un control a lo largo de toda la temporada en soja.

Keywords

2,4-D aminecloransulamfomesafenlactofensulfentrazonegiant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Preplant herbicidespreplanttillageweed controlweed resistance management
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 45 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Kevin Bradley, University of Missouri.

References

Literature Cited

Abul-Fatih, HA, Bazzaz, FA (1979) Biology of Ambrosia trifida L. 2. Germination, emergence, growth and survival. New Phytol 83:817–827 Google Scholar
Aulakh, JS, Price, AJ, Enloe, SF, Santen, EV, Wehtje, G, Patterson, MG (2012) Palmer amaranth management in glufosinate-resistant cotton: I. Tillage system, cover crops and herbicide management. Weed Management and Herbicide Resistance Special Issue. Agronomy 2:295–311 Google Scholar
Aulakh, JS, Price, AJ, Enloe, SF, Wehtje, G, Patterson, MG (2013) Integrated Palmer amaranth management in glufosinate-resistant cotton: II. Primary, secondary and conservation tillage. Agronomy 3:28–42 Google Scholar
Bagavathiannan, MV, Norsworthy, JK (2012) Late-season seed production in arable weed communities: management implications. Weed Sci 60:325–334 Google Scholar
Barnett, KA, Steckel, LE (2013) Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) competition in cotton. Weed Sci 61:543–548 Google Scholar
Bassett, IJ, Crompton, CW (1982) The biology of Canadian weeds. 55. Ambrosia trifida L. Can J Plant Sci 62:1003–1010 Google Scholar
Baysinger, JA, Sims, BD (1991) Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 39:358–362 Google Scholar
Bazzaz, FA, Carlson, RW (1979) Photosynthetic contribution of flowers and seeds to reproductive effort of an annual colonizer. New Phytol 82:223–232 Google Scholar
Bernards, ML, Crespo, RJ, Kruger, GR, Gaussoin, R, Tranel, PJ (2012) A waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) population resistant to 2,4–D. Weed Sci 60:379–384 Google Scholar
Bloomberg, JR, Kirkpatrick, BL, Wax, LM (1982) Competition of common cocklebur with soybean. Weed Sci 30:507–513 Google Scholar
Clements, DR, Benoit, DL, Murphy, SD, Swanton, CJ (1996) Tillage effects on weed seed return and seed bank composition. Weed Sci 44:314–322 Google Scholar
Coble, HD, Williams, FM, Ritter, RL (1981) Common ragweed interference in soybeans. Weed Sci 29:339–342 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC, Kichler, J (2009) Impact of tillage on managing glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in cotton. Page 1343 in Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. San Antonio, TX National Cotton Council of America Google Scholar
Davis, AS, Clay, S, Cardina, J, Dille, A, Forcella, F, Lindquist, J, Sprague, C (2013) Seed burial physical environment explains departures from regional hydrothermal model of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) seedling emergence in U.S. Midwest. Weed Sci 61:415–421 Google Scholar
Duke, SO (2012) Why have no new herbicide modes of action appeared in recent years? Pest Manag Sci 68:505–512 Google Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Witt, WW (2002) Comparison of glyphosate with other herbicides for weed control in corn (Zea mays): efficacy and economics. Weed Technol 16:701–706 Google Scholar
Follings, J, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2013) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.): 2,4-D dose response and control with postemergence herbicides in soybean. Am J Plant Sci 4:1790–1798 Google Scholar
Franey, RJ, Hart, SE (1999) Timing of application of cloransulam for giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 13:825–828 Google Scholar
Ganie, ZA, Sandell, L, Lindquist, J, Kruger, GR, Mithila, J, Marx, DB, Jhala, AJ (2015) Integrated management of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed with tillage and herbicides in corn. Page 57 in Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Weed Science Society of America. Lexington, KY: Weed Science Society of America Google Scholar
Givens, WA, Shaw, DR, Kruger, GR, Young, BG, Wilson, RG, Wilcut, JW, Jordan, DL, Weller, SC (2009) Survey of tillage trends following the adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 23:162–166 Google Scholar
Glettner, CE, Stoltenberg, DE (2015) Noncompetitive growth and fecundity of Wisconsin giant ragweed resistant to glyphosate. Weed Sci 63:273–281 Google Scholar
Green, JM (2014) Current state of herbicides in herbicide-resistant crops. Pest Manag Sci 70:1351–1357 Google Scholar
Harrison, SK, Regnier, EE, Schmoll, JT, Webb, JE (2001) Competition and fecundity of giant ragweed in corn. Weed Sci 49:224–229 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2015) International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/In.asp. Accessed January 20, 2015Google Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Sandell, LD, Kruger, GR (2014) Control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) with 2, 4-D followed by pre-emergence or post-emergence herbicides in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max L.). Am J Plant Sci 15:2289–2297 Google Scholar
Johnson, B, Loux, MM, Nordby, D, Sprague, C, Nice, G, Westhoven, A, Stachler, J (2006) Biology and Management of Giant Ragweed. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Extension Publication GWC-12Google Scholar
Johnson, W, Barnes, J, Gibson, K, Weller, S (2004) Late-season weed escapes in Indiana soybean fields. Crop Manag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/CM-2004-0923-01-BR. Accessed March 26, 2015Google Scholar
Jordan, TN (1985) Weed survey of the North Central Weed Control Conference. Pages 344–455 in Proceedings of the 42nd North Central Weed Control Conference. Las Cruces, NM North Central Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Kaur, S (2015) Biology and Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed. M.S. dissertation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska-Lincoln. 12 pGoogle Scholar
Kaur, S, Sandell, LD, Lindquist, JL, Jhala, AJ (2014) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) control in glufosinate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol 28:569–577 Google Scholar
Kelley, KB, Wax, LM, Hager, AG, Riechers, DE (2005) Soybean response to plant growth regulator herbicides is affected by other postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci 53:101–112 Google Scholar
Kelly, AB, Mueller, TC, Steckel, LE (2012) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) control in WideStrike® flex cotton. Weed Technol 26:611–616 Google Scholar
Kelton, JA, Price, AJ, Patterson, MG, Monks, CD, Santen, EV (2013) Evaluation of tillage and herbicide interaction for Amaranthus control in cotton. Weed Technol 27:298–304 Google Scholar
Kil, JH, Shim, KC, Park, SH, Koh, KS, Suh, MH, Ku, YB, Suh, SU, Oh, HK, Kong, HY (2004) Distributions of naturalized alien plants in South Korea. Weed Technol 18:1493–1495 Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ (2015) Soybean. Pages 112–118 in Knezevic, SZ, Jhala, AJ, Klein, RN, Kruger, GR, Reicher, ZJ, Wilson, RG, Shea, PJ, Ogg, CL, eds. 2015 Guide for Weed Management in Nebraska with Insecticide and Fungicide Information. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska–Lincoln Extension Google Scholar
Loux, MM, Berry, MA (1991) Use of a grower survey for estimating weed problems. Weed Technol 5:460–466 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Jha, P, Steckel, LE, Scott, RC (2010) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Tennessee. Weed Technol 24:64–70 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Rair, D, Jha, P, Scott, RC (2011) Confirmation, control and physiology of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 25:430–435 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci (Special Issue) 60:31–62 Google Scholar
Patzoldt, WL, Tranel, PJ (2002) Molecular analysis of cloransulam resistance in a population of giant ragweed. Weed Sci 50:299–305 Google Scholar
Powles, SB, Yu, Q (2010) Evolution in action: plants resistant to herbicides. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:317–347 Google Scholar
Rana, N, Nedeljkovic, D, Scott, J, Sandell, L, Knezevic, S (2013) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed in Nebraska. Pages 161–164 in 2013 Proceedings: Crop Production Clinics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension Google Scholar
Regnier, EE, Stoller, EW (1989) The effects of soybean (Glycine max) interference on the canopy architecture of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), jimsonweed (Datura stramonium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci 37:187–195 Google Scholar
Riley, EB, Bradley, K (2012) Preplant herbicide options for the management of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed in soybean. http://ipm.missouri.edu/IPCM. Accessed January 26, 2015Google Scholar
Riley, EB, Bradley, KW (2014) Influence of application timing and glyphosate tank mix combinations on the survival of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in soybean. Weed Technol 28:1–9 Google Scholar
Robinson, AP, Davis, VM, Simpson, DM, Johnson, WG (2013) Response of soybean yield components to 2,4–D. Weed Sci 61:68–76 Google Scholar
Rybnicek, O, Jager, S (2001) Ambrosia (ragweed) in Europe. Allergy Clin Immunol Int 13:60–66 Google Scholar
Schutte, BJ, Regnier, EE, Harrison, SK (2012) Seed dormancy and adaptive seedling emergence timing in giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Weed Sci 60:19–26 Google Scholar
Schutte, BJ, Regnier, EE, Harrison, SK, Schmoll, JT, Spokas, K, Forcella, F (2008) A hydrothermal seedling emergence model for giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida). Weed Sci 56:555–560 Google Scholar
Shaner, DL, Beckie, HJ (2014) The future for weed control and technology. Pest Manag Sci 70:1329–1339 Google Scholar
Shaw, D, Culpepper, SA, Owen, M, Price, AJ, Wilson, R (2012) Herbicide-resistant weeds threaten soil conservation gains: finding a balance for soil and farm sustainability. Issue Paper 49. Ames, IA: CAST Google Scholar
Shrestha, A, Lanini, T, Wright, S, Vargas, R, Mitchell, J (2006) Conservation tillage and weed management. http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/Details.aspx?itemNo=8200. Accessed March 6, 2015Google Scholar
Sikkema, PH, Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Smith, PJ, Lawton, MB, Tardif, FJ (2009) Suspected glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed in Ontario. Proc North Cent Weed Sci Soc 64:167 Google Scholar
Stachler, JM (2008) Characterization and Management of Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) and horseweed [Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.]. Ph.D Dissertation. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University. Pp 60–107 Google Scholar
Steckel, L (2007) Giant ragweed. https://utextension.tennessee.edu/publications/Documents/ W119.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2014Google Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Shrestha, A, Knezevic, SZ, Roy, RC, Ball-Coelho, BR (2000) Influence of tillage type on vertical weed seedbank distribution in a sandy soil. Can J Plant Sci 80:455–457 Google Scholar
Taylor, JB, Loux, MM, Harrison, SK, Regnier, E (2002) Response of ALS-resistant common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) to ALS-inhibiting and alternative herbicides. Weed Technol 16:815–825 Google Scholar
Vink, JP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2012a) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in Ontario: dose response and control with postemergence herbicides. Am J Plant Sci 3:608–617 Google Scholar
Vink, JP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2012b) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) control in dicamba-tolerant soybean. Weed Technol 26:422–428 Google Scholar
Walsh, M, Newman, P, Powles, S (2013) Targeting weed seeds in-crop: a new weed control paradigm for global agriculture. Weed Technol 27:431–436 Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Loux, MM, Regnier, EE, Harrison, SK (1994) Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) canopy architecture and interference studies in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 8:559–564 Google Scholar
Werle, R, Sandell, LD, Buhler, DD, Hartzler, RG, Lindquist, JL (2014) Predicting emergence of 23 summer annual weed species. Weed Sci 62:267–279 Google Scholar
Williams, CS, Hayes, RM (1984) Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 32:498–501 Google Scholar
Wilson, RG (1993) Effect of preplant tillage, postplant cultivation, and herbicides on weed density in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 7:728–734 Google Scholar
Wortman, SE (2014) Integrating weed and vegetable crop management with multifunctional air-propelled abrasive grits. Weed Technol 28:243–252 Google Scholar
Young, BG (2006) Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 20:301–307 Google Scholar
Zelaya, IA and Owen, MDK (2004) Evolved resistance to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides in common sunflower (Helianthus annuus), giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida), and shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) in Iowa. Weed Sci 52:538–548 Google Scholar