Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:25:11.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interactions of Clethodim and Sethoxydim with Selected Agrichemicals Applied to Peanut

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sarah H. Lancaster ,
David L. Jordan ,
Alan C. York ,
John W. Wilcut ,
David W. Monks  and
Rick L. Brandenburg
Sarah H. Lancaster
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
David L. Jordan*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Alan C. York
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7609, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Rick L. Brandenburg
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Box 7613, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: david_jordan@ncsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in North Carolina during 2002 and 2003 to evaluate broadleaf signalgrass and large crabgrass control by clethodim and sethoxydim applied in two-, three-, or four-way mixtures with fungicides, insecticides, and foliar fertilizer–plant growth regulator treatments. Broadleaf signalgrass and large crabgrass control by clethodim and sethoxydim was not reduced by the insecticides esfenvalerate, indoxacarb, or lambda-cyhalothrin. The fungicides azoxystrobin, chlorothalonil, pyraclostrobin, and tebuconazole reduced large crabgrass control by clethodim or sethoxydim in one or more of three experiments for each herbicide. Disodium octaborate and the plant growth regulator prohexadione calcium plus urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) mixed with clethodim and fungicides improved large crabgrass control in some experiments. In contrast, prohexadione calcium plus UAN and disodium octaborate did not affect broadleaf signalgrass or large crabgrass control by sethoxydim.

Keywords

chlorothalonil, tetrachloroisophthalonitrileclethodimprohexadione calcium, calcium 3-oxido-5-oxo-4-propionylcyclohex-3-enecarboxylatesethoxydimlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSAPesticide compatibilitypesticide interactionPGR, plant growth regulatorUAN, urea ammonium nitrate
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 456 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beam, J. B., Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Bailey, J. E., Isleib, T. G., and McKemie, T. E. 2002a. Influence of prohexadione calcium on pod yield loss and pod loss of peanut. Agron. J. 94:331–336.Google Scholar
Beam, J. B., Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Bailey, J. E., Isleib, T. G., and McKemie, T. E. 2002b. Interaction of prohexadione calcium with agrichemicals applied to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Peanut Sci. 29:29–35.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, R. L. 2004. Peanut Insect and Mite Management. 2004 Peanut Information. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension Service Ser. AG-331. Pp. 55–72.Google Scholar
Burke, I. C., Price, A. J., Wilcut, J. W., Jordan, D. L., Culpepper, A. S., and Tredaway-Ducar, J. 2004. Annual grass control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with clethodim and imazapic. Weed Technol. 18:88–92.Google Scholar
Byrd, J. D. and York, A. C. 1988. Interactions of carbaryl and dimethoate with sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 2:433–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franetovich, L. M. and Peeper, T. F. 1995. Quinclorac for cheat (Bromus secalinus) control in wheat (Triticum aestivium). Weed Technol. 9:131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascho, G. J. and Davis, J. G. 1995. Soil fertility and plant nutrition. in Pattee, H. E. and Stalker, H. T., eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK: American Peanut Research and Education Society. Pp. 383–418.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. 1989. Herbicide antagonism at the whole plant level. Weed Technol. 3:217–226.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J., Besler, B. A., Brewer, K. D., and Baughman, T. A. 2002. Grass control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with clethodim and selected broadleaf herbicide combinations. Peanut Sci. 29:85–88.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N. 1995. Ammonium sulfate effects on the activity of herbicides for selective grass control. Weed Technol. 9:260–266.Google Scholar
Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:1–63.Google Scholar
Holshouser, D. L. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:128–133.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 2004a. Peanut Production Practices. 2004 Peanut Information. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension Service Ser. AG-331. Pp. 21–32.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 2004b. Weed Management in Peanuts. 2004 Peanut Information. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension Service Ser. AG-331. Pp 33–53.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Culpepper, A. S., Grichar, W. J., Tredaway-Ducar, J., Brecke, B. J., and York, A. C. 2003. Weed control with combinations of selected fungicides and herbicides applied postemergence to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Peanut Sci. 30:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993. Interactions of DPX-PE350 with fluazifop-P, sethoxydim, clethodim, and quizalofop-P. Weed Technol. 7:605–610.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. and Hans, S. R. 2004. Compatibility of clethodim and sethoxydim formulations with other agrichemicals. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:239.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Swann, C. W., Culpepper, A. S., and York, A. C. 2000. Influence of adjuvants on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) response to prohexadione calcium. Peanut Sci. 27:30–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L. and York, A. C. 1989. Effects of ammonium fertilizers and BCH 81508 S on antagonism with sethoxydim plus bentazon mixtures. Weed Technol. 3:450–454.Google Scholar
Lanier, J. E., Jordan, D. L., Culpepper, A. S., Grichar, W. J., Tredaway-Ducar, J. E., and Brecke, B. J. 2002. Interactions of selected fungicides and herbicides applied postemergence to peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:185.Google Scholar
Lynch, R. E. and Mack, T. P. 1995. Biological and biotechnical advances for insect management in peanut. in Pattee, H. E. and Stalker, H. T., eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK: American Peanut Research and Education Society. Pp. 95–159.Google Scholar
Mitchem, W. E., York, A. C., and Batts, R. B. 1996. Peanut response to prohexadione calcium, a new plant growth regulator. Peanut Sci. 23:1–9.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D., Manthey, F. A., Szelezniak, E. F., and Anyska, Z. 1989. Sodium bicarbonate antagonism of sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 3:654–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwood, J. L., Beute, M. K., Dickson, D. W., Elliot, V. J., Nelson, R. S., Opperman, C. H., and Shew, B. B. 1995. Biological and biotechnical control in Arachis diseases. in Pattee, H. E. and Stalker, H. T., eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK: American Peanut Research and Education Society. Pp. 160–206.Google Scholar
Shew, B. 2004. Peanut Disease Management. 2004 Peanut Information. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension Service Ser. AG-331. Pp. 73–96.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Reynolds, D. B., and Blouin, D. C. 1995. Grass control in soybean (Glycine max) with graminicides applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol. 9:68–72.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1993. Overcoming antagonistic effects of Na-bentazon on sethoxydim absorption. Weed Technol. 7:322–325.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1989. Identification of efficacious adjuvants for sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Technol. 3:60–66.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2001. Weed survey—Southern States. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:249–259.Google Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., Grichar, W. J., and Wehtje, G. R. 1995. The biology and management of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). in Pattee, H. E. and Stalker, H. T., eds. Advances in Peanut Science. Stillwater, OK: American Peanut Research and Education Society. Pp. 207–224.Google Scholar