Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:20:21.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Pollen Expresses ACCase Target-Site Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ian C. Burke ,
James B. Holland ,
James D. Burton ,
Alan C. York  and
John W. Wilcut
Ian C. Burke
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Box 7620 Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
James B. Holland
Affiliation:
USDA–ARS, Plant Science Research Unit, Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Box 7620 Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
James D. Burton
Affiliation:
Horticulture Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
Alan C. York
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
John W. Wilcut*
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: john_wilcut@ncsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three studies were conducted to develop pollen tests for the screening of acetyl coenzyme-A carboxylase (ACCase) target-site resistance in a biotype of johnsongrass. The assays were based on germination of johnsongrass pollen in media supplemented with clethodim. Two different methods were used to evaluate pollen germination—a visual assessment and a spectrophotometric assay. The response of pollen to the germination media was linear for 16 h. At 6 h after treatment, absorbance at 500 nm was nearly 0.5; consequently, 6 h was chosen to conduct the pollen assays using the spectrophotometer. Both assessment methods differentiated the susceptible (S) and resistant (R) biotypes. Pollen from the susceptible biotype of johnsongrass was strongly inhibited by increasing concentrations of clethodim, with a GR50 of 25.8 ± 0.6 (SE) µM and GR50 of 16.4 ± 1.7 (SE) µM clethodim by visual assessment and spectrophotometric assessment, respectively. Minimum R/S values were > 3.9 by visual assessment and > 6.1 by spectrophotometric assessment. ACCase target-site resistance is expressed in johnsongrass pollen.

Keywords

johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. SORHAPollen assays
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 384 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous, , 2005. Select 2EC®. Pages 1888–1890. in Crop Protection Reference. 21st ed. New York C & P.Google Scholar
Alexander, M. P. 1969. Differential staining of aborted and non-aborted pollen. Stain Technol. 44:117–122.Google Scholar
Burke, I. C., Burton, J. D., York, A. C., Wilcut, J. W., and Cranmer, J. 2006a. Mechanism of resistance to clethodim in a johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) biotype. Weed Sci. 54:401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, I. C., Thomas, W. E., Burton, J. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2006b. A seedling assay to screen aryloxyphenoxypropionic acid and cyclohexanedione resistance in johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol. 20:950–955.Google Scholar
Burke, I. C., Wilcut, J. W., and Allen, N. S. 2006c. Viability and in vitro germination of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) pollen. Weed Sci. 54:401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, I. C., Wilcut, J. W., and Cranmer, J. 2006d. Cross resistance of a johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) biotype to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides. Weed Technol. 20:571–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, J. D. 1997. Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors. Pages 187–205. in Roe, R.M., Burton, J.D. and Kuhr, R.J. eds. Herbicide Activity: Toxicology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Burke, VA: IOS.Google Scholar
Doggett, H. 1988. Sorghum. New York Wiley and Sons. 512.Google Scholar
Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis. New York J. Wiley. 33–42.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plunknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1991. The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology. Malabar, FL Krieger Publishing. 54–61.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. 1973. Competitive effects of three perennial weeds, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers., Cyperus rotundus L., and Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. on young citrus. J. Hortic. Sci. 48:134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Incledon, B. J. and Hall, J. C. 1997. Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase: quaternary structure and inhibition by graminicidal herbicides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 57:255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappler, R. and Kristen, U. 1987. Photometric quantification of in vitro pollen-tube growth—a new method suited to determine the cytotoxicity of various environmental substances. Environ. Exp. Bot. 27:305–309.Google Scholar
Lansac, A. R., Sullivan, C. Y., Johnson, B. E., and Lee, K. W. 1994. Viability and germination of the pollen of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Ann. Bot. 74:27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letouze, A. and Gasquez, J. 2000. A pollen test to detect ACCase target-site resistance within Alopecurus myosuroides populations. Weed Res. 40:151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, D. A. and Kerster, H. W. 1974. Gene flow in seed plants. Pages 139–220. in Dobzhansky, T., Hecht, M.K. and Steere, W.C. eds. Evolutionary Biology. Volume 7. New York Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. G. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.Google Scholar
Murray, B. G., Morrison, I. N., and Friesen, L. F. 2002. Pollen-mediated gene flow in wild oat. Weed Sci. 50:321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, S., Simonsen, V., and Loeschcke, V. 1987. Overlap of gametophytic and sporophytic gene expression in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75:200–206.Google Scholar
Richter, J. and Powles, S. B. 1993. Pollen expression of herbicide target site resistance genes in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Plant Physiol. 102:1037–1041.Google Scholar
Rosenow, D. T. and Clark, L. E. 1969. Description of off-types. Pages 43–48. in Proceedings of the 6th Biennial Grain Sorghum Research and Utilization Conference. Amarillo, TX National Grain Sorghum Producers.Google Scholar
Gorla, M. Sari, Frova, C., Binelli, G., and Ottaviano, E. 1986. The extent of gametophytic-sporophytic gene expression in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 72:42–47.Google Scholar
SAS 1998. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Cary, NC SAS Institute Release 7.00. 1028.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J., and Fuerst, P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose–response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:213–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shivanna, K. R. and Rangaswamy, N. S. 1992. Pollen Biology: A Laboratory Manual. New York Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeda, R. J., Currie, R. S., and Rippee, J. H. 2000. Fluazifop-P resistance expressed as a dominant trait in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Sci. 14:397–401.Google Scholar
Smeda, R. J., Snipes, C. E., and Barrentine, W. L. 1997. Identification of graminicide-resistant johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 45:132–137.Google Scholar
Tal, A. and Rubin, B. 2004. Molecular characterization and inheritance of resistance to ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in Lolium rigidum . Pestic. Manag. Sci. 60:1013–1018.Google Scholar
Tanksley, S. D., Zamir, D., and Rick, C. M. 1981. Evidence for extensive overlap of sporophytic and gametophytic gene expression in Lycopersicon esculentum . Science 213:453–455.Google Scholar