Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:29:35.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kochia (Kochia scoparia) Interference with Oat (Avena sativa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Frank A. Manthey ,
Gary A. Hareland ,
Richard K. Zollinger  and
Donna J. Huseby
Frank A. Manthey
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Gary A. Hareland
Affiliation:
USDA/ARS, Hard Red Spring Wheat and Durum Wheat Quality Laboratory, Cereal Crops Res., Fargo, ND 58105
Richard K. Zollinger
Affiliation:
USDA/ARS, Hard Red Spring Wheat and Durum Wheat Quality Laboratory, Cereal Crops Res., Fargo, ND 58105
Donna J. Huseby
Affiliation:
Dep. Cereal Sci. Food Technol., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted over five years to determine the effect of season-long kochia interference on oat yield and quality. Kochia interference did not affect oat height, test weight, 500-kernel weight, or groat percentage. Similarly, ash, starch, and total β-glucan percentages in oat groat were not affected by kochia interference. Oat grain yield was reduced in 1991 and 1994 by 30 kochia plants/m2, the highest density. Lipid and protein content were not affected by kochia except in 1992 where protein content was reduced and lipid content was increased by kochia.

Keywords

Kochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. ♯3KCHSCoat Avena sativa L.Competitioncrop qualitygrain qualityKCHSC
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 522 - 525
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alessi, J. and Power, J. F. 1970. Influence of row spacing, irrigation, and weeds on dryland flax yield, quality, and water use. Agron. J. 62:635–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. American Association of Cereal Chemists. 1983. Approved Methods of the AACC. Methods: ash (08–01), moisture (44–19), starch (76–11), protein (46–11 A), dietary fiber (32–07), and total beta-glucan (32–22). Am. Assoc. Cereal Chem., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
3. Anderson, J. W. and Chen, W. L. 1986. Cholesterol-lowering properties of oat products. p. 309–333 in Webster, F. H., ed., Oats: Chemistry and Technology. Am. Assoc. Cereal Chem., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
4. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 16:505–508.Google Scholar
5. Burrows, V. D. and Olson, P. J. 1955. Reaction of small grains to various densities of wild mustard and the results obtained after their removal with 2,4-D or by hand. I. Experiments with wheat. Can. J. Agric. Sci. 35:68–75.Google Scholar
6. Conway, T. F. and Earle, F. R. 1963. Nuclear magnetic resonance for determining oil content of seeds. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 40:265–268.Google Scholar
7. Dahl, G. K. 1984. Weed competition in wheat. MS thesis. North Dakota State Univ., Fargo. 99 p.Google Scholar
8. Dahl, G. K., Dexter, A. G., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1982. Kochia competition in wheat. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 37:15–16.Google Scholar
9. Dexter, A. G., Nalewaja, J. D., Rasmusson, D. D., and Buchli, J. 1981. Survey of wild oats and other weeds in North Dakota, 1978 and 1979. North Dakota Res. Rep. No. 79. 80 p.Google Scholar
10. Durgan, B. R., Dexter, A. G., and Miller, S. D. 1990. Kochia (Kochia scoparia) interference in sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Weed Technol. 4:52–56.Google Scholar
11. Elmore, C. D. and Paul, R. N. 1983. Composite list of C4 weeds. Weed Sci. 31:686–692.Google Scholar
12. Friesen, G. and Shebeski, L. H. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. I. Weed species, their relative abundance and their effect on crop yields. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40:457–467.Google Scholar
13. Friesen, G., Shebeski, L. H., and Robinson, A. D. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. II. Effect of weed competition on the protein content of cereal crops. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40:652–658.Google Scholar
14. Lochhart, H. B. and Hurt, H. D. 1986. Nutrition of oats. p. 297–308 in Webster, F. H., ed., Oats: Chemistry and Technology. Am. Assoc. Cereal Chem., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
15. Pearcy, R. W., Tumosa, N., and Williams, K. 1981. Relationships between growth, photosynthesis and competitive interactions for a C3 and C4 plant. Oecologia 48:371–376.Google Scholar
16. Phillips, W. M. and Launchbaugh, J. L. 1958. Preliminary studies of the root system of Kochia scoparia at Hays, Kansas. Weeds 6:19–23.Google Scholar
17. Schrickel, D. J. 1986. Oats production, value, and use. p. 1–11 in Webster, F. H., ed. Oats: Chemistry and Technology. Am. Assoc. Cereal Chem., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
18. Stevens, O. A. 1963. Handbook of North Dakota Plants. N.D. Inst. for Regional Studies, Fargo, ND. 328 p.Google Scholar
19. Wiese, A. F. and Vandiver, C. W. 1970. Soil moisture effects on competitive ability of weeds. Weed Sci. 18:518–519.Google Scholar