Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:59:43.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lactofen Systems for Broadleaf Weed Control in Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John W. Wilcut ,
Charles W. Swann  and
Henry B. Hagwood
John W. Wilcut
Affiliation:
Tidewater Agric. Exp. Stn., Virginia Polytech. Inst. & State Univ., P. O. Box 7219, 6321 Holland Road, Suffolk, VA 23437
Charles W. Swann
Affiliation:
Tidewater Agric. Exp. Stn., Virginia Polytech. Inst. & State Univ., P. O. Box 7219, 6321 Holland Road, Suffolk, VA 23437
Henry B. Hagwood
Affiliation:
Valent USA Corp., Oxford, NC 27565
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed management systems using a chloroacetamide herbicide applied preplant incorporated (PPI) and at cracking (AC) plus lactofen applied AC and early postemergence (POST) controlled at least 98% of common lambsquarters. Similar systems using a chloroacetamide herbicide applied PPI and early POST plus lactofen applied early POST and postemergence (POST) controlled less than 70% of common lambsquarters. All sequential lactofen systems controlled common ragweed completely and at least 86% of morningglory species. Highest peanut yields and net returns were obtained with weed management systems consisting of sequential applications of lactofen applied AC and early POST, or systems that used acifluorfen plus bentazon POST, or lactofen plus bentazon applied early POST or POST.

Keywords

Acifluorfen, 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acidbentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxidelactofen, (±)-2-ethoxy-1-methyl-2-oxoethyl 5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoatecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. ♯3 CHEALcommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. ♯ AMBELIpomoea spp.peanut, Arachis hypogaea L.Economic analysisnet returnsAmbrosia artemisiifoliaChenopodium albumIpomoea spp.AMBELCHEALIPOHEIPOHGIPOLAPHBPU
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 819 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barker, M. A., Thompson, L. Jr., and Godley, F. M. 1984. Control of annual morningglories (Ipomoea spp.) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32:813–818.Google Scholar
2. Boote, K. J. 1982. Growth stages of peanut. Peanut Sci. 9:35–40.Google Scholar
3. Buchanan, G. A., Murray, D. S., and Hauser, E. W. 1983. Weeds and their control in peanuts. p. 206–249 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., ed. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
4. Davidson, J. I. Jr., Whitaker, T. B., and Dickens, J. W. 1982. Grading, cleaning, storage, shelling, marketing of peanuts in the United States. p. 571–623 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., ed. Peanut Science and Technology. Am Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar
5. Elmore, C. D. 1989. Weed Survey–Southern States. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:408–420.Google Scholar
6. Gallimore, G. G., Updike, G. H., and Sturt, S. G. III. 1988–1989. Crop enterprise cost analysis for southeast Virginia. Virginia Coop. Ext. Serv. Va. Polytech. Inst. & State Univ. Blacksburg, VA. 43 p.Google Scholar
7. Hagwood, H. B., and Wilcut, J. W. 1989. Evaluation of lactofen for broadleaf weed control in Virginia peanuts. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 19:57.Google Scholar
8. Higgins, J. M., Whitwell, T., Murdock, E. C., and Toler, J. E. 1988. Recovery of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) following applications of acifluorfen, fomesafen, and lactofen. Weed Sci. 36:345–353.Google Scholar
9. Horton, D. N., and Wilcut, J. W. 1989. Timing of Gramoxone applications for broadleaf weed control in Virginia peanuts. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. 19:54.Google Scholar
10. Ogg, A. G. Jr., and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci. 32:327–335.Google Scholar
11. Wilcut, J. W., and Swann, C. W. 1990. Timing of paraquat applications for weed control in Virginia-type peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 38: (In press).Google Scholar
12. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Cole, T. A., Hicks, T. V., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Postemergence weed control systems without dinoseb for peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37:385–391.Google Scholar
13. Williams, J. T. 1963. Biological flora of the British Isles. Chenopodium album L. J. Ecol. 51:711–725.Google Scholar
14. Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1987. Snapbean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) response to acifluorfen. Weed Technol. 1:18–21.Google Scholar
15. Young, J. H., Person, N. K. Jr., Donald, J. O., and Mayfield, W. D. 1982. Harvesting, curing and energy utilization. p. 458–485 in Pattee, H. E. and Young, C. T., ed. Peanut Science and Technology. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., Yoakum, TX 77995.Google Scholar