Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:34:01.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Long-Term Control of Perennial Broadleaf Weeds and Triazine-Resistant Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) in No-Till Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Scott Glenn
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park. MD 20742
William H. Phillips II
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park. MD 20742
Pablo Kalnay
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Maryland, College Park. MD 20742

Abstract

Control and regrowth of hemp dogbane, wild blackberry, and triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (TR-CHEAL) were studied in no-till corn from 1992 to 1994. Hemp dogbane, wild blackberry, and TR-CHEAL population increased 10, 123, and 177%, respectively, between 1992 and 1994 in plots treated with PRE applications of paraquat, atrazine, and metolachlor (weedy checks). POST applications of tank mixtures of 35 g ai/ha nicosulfuron or 20 g/ha primisulfuron with 280 g/ha 2,4-D or 140 g/ha dicamba, and 560 g/ha dicamba applied alone controlled hemp dogbane, wild blackberry, and TR-CHEAL 67 to 98%. These treatments reduced the population or prevented expansion of these weeds the year following treatment. In 1992, corn yield response to weed control was inconsistent. In 1993 and 1994, all plots treated with POST herbicides yielded higher than the weedy check. Corn yield of plots treated with combinations of nicosulfuron or primisulfuron with 2,4-D or dicamba and 560 g/ha dicamba applied alone were 102 to 149% and 124 to 153% higher than the weedy check in 1993 and 1994, respectively.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1970. Selected Weeds of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Services USDA-ARS Agricultural Handbook No. 366. 463 p.Google Scholar
Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Cowett, E. R. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds in North America. In LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: Wiley-Interscience. pp. 930.Google Scholar
Becker, R. 1981. Today's weed: hemp dogbane. Weeds Today 12:1516.Google Scholar
Coffman, C. B. and Frank, J. R. 1991. Weed–crop responses to weed management systems in conservation tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5:7681.Google Scholar
Fuerst, E. P., Barrett, M., and Penner, D. 1986. Control of triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and two pigweed species (Amaranthus spp.) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34:440443.Google Scholar
Glenn, S. and Anderson, N. G. 1993. Hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) and wild blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis) control in no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7:4751.Google Scholar
Haas, H. and Streibig, J. C. 1982. Changing patterns of weed distribution as a result of herbicide use and other agronomic factors. In LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: Wiley-Interscience. pp. 5759.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E. and Penner, D. 1993. Atrazine reduces primisulfuron transport to meristems of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 41:2833.Google Scholar
Menbere, H. and Ritter, R. L. 1995. Postemergence control of triazine-resistant common lambsquarters in no-till corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:92.Google Scholar
Myers, M. G. and Harvey, R. G. 1993. Triazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) control in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5:782788.Google Scholar
Orfanedes, M. S. and Wax, L. M. 1991. Differential response of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) to clopyralid, Dowco 433, and 2,4-D. Weed Technol. 5:782788.Google Scholar
Parochetti, J. V., Schnappinger, M. G., Ryan, G. F., and Collins, H. A. 1982. Practical significance and means of control of herbicide-resistant weeds. In LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: Wiley-Interscience. pp. 309323.Google Scholar
Robison, L. R. and Jeffery, L. S. 1972. Hemp dogbane growth and control. Weed Sci. 20:156159.Google Scholar
Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1979. Distribution, competition and phenology of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) in Nebraska. Weed Sci. 27:565570.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr. 1985. Principles of weed control for reduced-tillage corn production. In Weise, A. F., ed. Weed Control in Limited Tillage Systems. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America Monogr. 2. pp. 2640.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr., and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20:453457.Google Scholar
Williams, J. L. Jr., and Wicks, G. A. 1978. Weed Control Problems Associated with Crop Residue Systems. Washington, DC. American Society of Agronomy Special Pub. 31. pp. 165172.Google Scholar
Yonce, M. H. and Scroch, W. A. 1989. Control of selected perennial weeds with glyphosate. Weed Sci. 37:360364.Google Scholar