Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:34:41.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management of Large, Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Whitney D. Crow ,
Lawrence E. Steckel ,
Thomas C. Mueller  and
Robert M. Hayes
Whitney D. Crow
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 605 Airways Boulevard, Jackson, TN 38301
Lawrence E. Steckel*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 605 Airways Boulevard, Jackson, TN 38301
Thomas C. Mueller
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
Robert M. Hayes
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 605 Airways Boulevard, Jackson, TN 38301
*
∗Corresponding author's E-mail: lsteckel@utk.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Palmer amaranth is a very problematic weed that has evolved resistance to several classes of herbicides, including 5-enolypyruvylshikimate-3-phosate synthase–inhibiting herbicides and photosystem II–inhibiting herbicides. In recent years, corn producers have had difficulty controlling large Palmer amaranth (> 20 cm) in corn > 30 cm whether it be due to environmental conditions or management failures. Palmer amaranth management in corn this tall is made even more challenging because atrazine is not labeled POST in corn > 30 cm tall. Therefore, a study was conducted in 2013 and 2014 in Jackson, TN, to evaluate herbicide programs in corn > 30 cm tall for the control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth > 20 cm tall. Treatments consisted of herbicides applied alone and in mixtures with dicamba plus diflufenzopyr. Herbicides were applied POST to corn between the V5 and V6 growth stages. Dicamba plus diflufenzopyr 28 d after application controlled Palmer amaranth > 87%. The herbicides alone or in combinations applied as tank mixtures did not improve control (< 76%) over dicamba plus diflufenzopyr alone. There were no grain-yield differences among treatments because of Palmer amaranth control. This was likely due to the Palmer amaranth competition having already affected corn yield by the V5 to V6 corn growth stages.

Amaranthus palmeri es una maleza muy problemática que ha evolucionado resistencia a varias clases de herbicidas, incluyendo herbicidas inhibidores de 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase y herbicidas inhibidores del fotosistema II. En años recientes, productores de maíz han tenido dificultades para controlar plantas grandes (>20 cm) de A. palmeri en maíz >30 cm, ya sea debido a condiciones ambientales o a fallas en el manejo. El manejo de A. palmeri en maíz de esta altura se ha hecho más difícil porque atrazine no está registrado para aplicaciones POST en maíz >30 cm de altura. Por esta razón, se realizó un estudio en 2013 y 2014 en Jackson, Tennessee, para evaluar programas de herbicidas en maíz >30 cm de altura para el control de A. palmeri >20 cm resistente a glyphosate. Los tratamientos consistieron de herbicidas aplicados solos y en mezclas con dicamba más diflufenzopyr. Los herbicidas fueron aplicados al maíz POST entre los estadios de crecimiento V5 y V6. Dicamba más diflufenzopyr 28 d después de la aplicación controló A. palmeri >87%. Los herbicidas solos o en combinaciones aplicados como mezclas en tanque no mejoraron el control (<76%) en comparación con solo dicamba más diflufenzopyr. No hubo diferencias en el rendimiento de grano entre tratamientos debido al control de A. palmeri. Este se debió probablemente a que la competencia de A. palmeri ya había afectado el rendimiento del maíz en los estadios de crecimiento V5 y V6.

Keywords

DicambadiflufenzopyrPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Watscorn, Zea mays L.Cornglyphosate resistantPalmer amaranthrescue treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 611 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: William Johnson, Purdue University.

References

Literature Cited

Abendroth, LJ, Elmore, RW, Boyer, MJ, Marlay, SK (2011) Corn Growth and Development. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Extension PMR 1009 Google Scholar
Anonymous (2014a) AAtrex 4L herbicide product label. EPA Reg. No. 100-497. Greensboro, NC: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. 11 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2014b) Liberty herbicide product label. EPA Reg. No. 264-829. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer CropScience LP. 5 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2014c) Callisto herbicide product label. EPA Reg. No. 100-1131. Greensboro, NC: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. 14 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2014d) Laudis herbicide product label. EPA Reg. No. 264-960. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer CropScience LP. 7 pGoogle Scholar
Carey, JB, Kells, JJ (1995) Timing of total postemergence herbicide application to maximize weed control and corn (Zea mays) yield. Weed Technol 9: 356–361 Google Scholar
Carmer, SG, Nyquist, WE, Walker, WM (1989) Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three-factor treatment designs. Agron J 81: 665–672 Google Scholar
Chandi, A, Jordan, DL, York, AC, Lewis, R M, Burton, JD, Culpepper, AS, Whitaker, JA (2013) Interference and control of glyphosate resistant and susceptible Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) populations under greenhouse conditions. Weed Sci 64: 259–266 Google Scholar
Fernandez-Corejo, J, McBride, WD (2000) Genetically Engineered Crops for Pest Management in U.S. Agriculture: Farm Level Effects . Washington, DC: Resource Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Economics Report No. 786. http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/323484/aer786_1_.pdf. Assessed September 16, 2014Google Scholar
Gower, SA, Loux, MM, Cardina, J, Harrison, SK, Spankle, PL, Probst, NJ, Bauman, TT, Bugg, W, Curran, WS, Currie, RS, Harvey, RG, Johnson, WG, Kells, JJ, Owen, MDK, Regehr, DL, Slack, CH, Spaur, M, Sprague, CL, VanGessel, M, Young, BG (2001) Effect of postemergence glyphosate application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-resistant corn: results of a 2-yr multistate study. Weed Technol 17: 821–828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gower, SA, Loux, MM, Harrison, SK (2002) Effect of planting date, residual herbicide, and postemergence application timing on weed control and grain yield in glyphosate-tolerant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 27: 63–71 Google Scholar
Hall, MR, Swanton, CJ, Anderson, GW (1992) The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci 40: 441–447 Google Scholar
Heap, IM (2013) International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed July 15, 2013Google Scholar
Horak, MJ, Loughin, TM (2000) Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Sci 48: 347–355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, PE, Carter, CH, Thullen, RM (1987) Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) . Weed Sci 35: 199–204 Google Scholar
Knake, EL, Slife, FW (1969) Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weeds 10: 26–29 Google Scholar
Massinga, RA, Currie, RS, Horak, MJ, Boyer, J Jr (2001) Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci 49: 202–208 Google Scholar
Massinga, RA, Currie, RS, Troien, TP (2003) Water use and light interception under Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and corn competition. Weed Sci 51: 523–531 Google Scholar
McClure, AT (2009) Planting Corn for Grain in Tennessee. https://utextension.tennessee.edu/publications/Documents/W077.pdf. Accessed July 29, 2014Google Scholar
Myers, MW, Curran, WS, VanGessel, MJ, Majek, BA, Scott, BA, Mortensen, DA, Calvin, DD, Karsten, HD, Roth, GW (2005) The effect of weed density and application timing on weed control and corn grain yield. Weed Technol 19: 102–107 Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture (2002) Agricultural Chemical Usage 2001 Field Crops Summary. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/AgriChemUsFC//2000s/2002/AgriChemUsFC-08-07-2002.pdf. Assessed March 7, 2015Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK (2004) Small grain cover crop interaction with glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 18: 52–59 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, GM, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Oliver, LR (2008) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22: 108–113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Oliveira, MJ (2004) Comparison of the critical period for weed control in wide- and narrow-row corn. Weed Sci 52: 802–804 Google Scholar
Page, ER, Cerrudo, D, Westra, M, Loux, M, Smith, K, Foresman, C, Wright, H, Swanton, CJ (2012) Why early season weed control is important in maize. Weed Sci 60: 423–430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, LE, Eubank, T, Montgomery, R, Scott, B, Smeda, R, Blinka, E, Mills, A, Stanislav, J, Seifert-Higgins, S, Zabala, F (2013) Palmer amaranth weed control programs for Roundup Ready Xtend soybeans in the mid-south. Page 179 in Proceedings of the 66th Annual Meeting of the Southern Weed Science Society (SWSS). Las Cruces, NM: SWSS Google Scholar
Steckel, LE, Sprague, CL (2004) Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in corn. Weed Sci 52: 359–364 Google Scholar
Tapia, LS, Bauman, TT, Harvey, RG, Kells, JJ, Kapusta, G, Loux, MM, Lueschen, WE, Owen, MDK, Hageman, LH, Strachan, SD (1997) Postemergence herbicide application timing effects on annual grass control and corn (Zea mays) grain yield. Weed Sci 45: 138–143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, TM, Grey, TL. (2015) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) morphology, growth and seed production in Georgia. Weed Sci 63: 264–272 Google Scholar
Zimdahl, RL (1988) The concept and application of the critical weed-free period. Pages 145–155 in Altieri, MA, Liebman, M, eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Google Scholar