Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:02:32.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methods of Measuring the Impact of the XA17 Gene on Imazethapyr Injury in Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Randall S. Currie  and
David L. Regehr
Randall S. Currie
Affiliation:
SW Research-Ext. Center, 4500 E. Mary St., Garden City, KS 67846
David L. Regehr
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Imazethapyr dose response curves were developed under laboratory and field conditions with the imazethapyr-resistant and -susceptible corn hybrids Pioneer 3180IR, IR denoting a hybrid homozygous for the XA17 gene conferring resistance to imazethapyr, and normal Pioneer 3180, respectively, and their F1 progeny to establish methods of measuring the presence of the XA17 gene and quantifying its impact. At two field locations, absorption of photosynthetically active radiation was a sensitive index of corn injury caused by imazethapyr. Imazethapyr, at 35 g/ha (one half the labeled rate), reduced absorption of photosynthetically active radiation in Pioneer 3180 by 8.3% at 1 wk after treatment. Plant height also was a sensitive index of injury. The minimum rate at which imazethapyr injury was detected in the Pioneer 3180IR/Pioneer 3180 F1 hybrid differed with location. Pioneer 3180IR was not injured by 280 g/ha of imazethapyr. The Pioneer 3180IR/3180 F1 hybrid was injured slightly by imazethapyr at 140 g/ha, but recovered within 5 wk after treatment, and grain yield was not reduced by 280 g/ha of imazethapyr. A seedling assay reliably detected differences between progeny of Pioneer 3180IR and Pioneer 3180IR/3180 F1.

Keywords

Imazethapyr 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidcorn, Zea mays L.Herbicide resistance
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 676 - 681
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1995. Pursuit Product Label. American Cyanamid Co., Wayne, NJ 07470.Google Scholar
2. Blackmer, T. M., Schepers, J. S., and Vigil, M. F. 1993. Chlorophyll meter readings in corn as affected by plant spacing. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 24:2507–2516.Google Scholar
3. Currie, R. S. and Regehr, D. L. 1994. Dose response curves to Pursuit using isolines of corn containing 0, 1, and 2 copies of a Pursuit-resistant als2 gene. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 34:55.Google Scholar
4. Currie, R. S. 1991. Impact of CGA-136872 and EPTC on enzymatic and growth characteristics of CGA-136872-tolerant and -susceptible corn (Zea mays L.) varieties. Ph.D. Diss. Texas A&M University, College Station. 80 p.Google Scholar
5. Dwyer, L. M., Tollenaar, M., and Houwing, L. 1991. A nondestructive method to monitor leaf greens in corn. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:505–509.Google Scholar
6. Fehr, W. R. 1987. Genetic Principles. p. 33–34 in Fehr, W. R., ed. Principles of Cultivar Development. The MacMillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
7. Gerwick, B. C., Mireles, L. C., and Eilers, R. J. 1993. Rapid diagnosis of ALS/AHAS-resistant weeds. Weed Technol. 7:519–524.Google Scholar
8. Green, J. M. and Ulrich, J. F. 1993. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci. 41:508–516.Google Scholar
9. Green, J. M. and Ulrich, J. F. 1994. Response of maize (Zea mays) inbreds and hybrids to rimsulfuron. Pestic. Sci. 40:187–191.Google Scholar
10. Harvey, R. G., Williams, B. J., and Langton, S. J. 1995. Efficacy of herbicide combinations designed for use in sethoxydim-tolerant field corn (Zea mays). Weed Soc. Sci. Am. Abstr. 35:6.Google Scholar
11. Harvey, R. G., Anthon, T. M., and Kutil, J. L. 1993. Corn hybrid-herbicide-insecticide study. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:230–233.Google Scholar
12. Kwon, C. S. and Penner, D. 1992. The potential of piperonyl butoxide to enhance weed control with postemergence application of sulfonylurea herbicide in corn. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 47:26–27.Google Scholar
13. Newhouse, K., Wang, T., and Anderson, P. 1991. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops. p. 139–150 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
14. Piekielek, W. P. and Fox, R. H. 1992. Comparison of corn leaf N requirements for maize. Agron. J. 84:59–64.Google Scholar
15. Porpiglia, P. J. and Gillespie, G. R. 1992. World wide maize (Zea mays L.) response to primisulfuron. Proc. Int. Weed Control Cong. 2:394–396.Google Scholar
16. Pieters, E., Bertges, B., and Kinney, D. 1995. Weed control in glufosinate resistant corn and soybeans. Weed Soc. Sci. Am. Abstr. 35:6.Google Scholar
17. Schepers, J. S., Francis, D. D., and Below, F. E. 1992. Comparisons of corn leaf N concentrations and chlorophyll meter readings. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 23:2173–2187.Google Scholar