Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:33:48.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postemergence Grass Control in Sweet Potatoes (Ipomoea batatas)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Wayne C. Porter
Wayne C. Porter*
Affiliation:
La. State Univ. Agric. Cent., La. Agric. Exp. Stn., Hammond Res. Stn., Hammond, LA 70403
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fluazifop-P, sethoxydim, and quizalofop were evaluated over two years for postemergence annual grass control in sweet potatoes. All treatments controlled broadleaf signalgrass and large crabgrass, but in 1987 only rates of at least 0.14 kg/ha of fluazifop-P and quizalofop and 0.28 kg/ha of sethoxydim controlled large crabgrass. No. 1 grade and total yield were greater from plots treated with herbicides compared with the weedy check in 1986. In 1987, No. 1 grade and total yield were greater in plots treated with fluazifop-P at 0.14 kg/ha or higher and sethoxydim or quizalofop at 0.28 kg/ha or higher.

Keywords

Fluazifop-P, (R)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidquizalofop, (+)-2-[4(6-chloro-2-quinoxalinyl) oxy]phenoxy]propanoic acidsethoxydim 2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-onesweet potato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. ‘Centennial’broadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash. # BRAPPlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSAFluazifop-PquizalofopsethoxydimBrachiaria platyphyllaDigitaria sanguinalisBRAPPDIGSA
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 812 - 815
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Banks, P. A. and Tripp, T. N. 1983. Control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in soybeans (Glycine max) with foliar-applied herbicides. Weed Sci. 31:628–633.Google Scholar
2. Brewster, B. D. and Spinney, R. L. 1989. Control of seedling grasses with postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Derr, J. F., Monaco, T. J., and Sheets, T. J. 1985. Response of three annual grasses to fluazifop. Weed Sci. 33:693–697.Google Scholar
4. Glaze, N. C. and Hall, M. R. 1990. Cultivation and herbicides for weed control in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Weed Technol. 4:518–523.Google Scholar
5. Grichar, W. J. and Boswell, T. E. 1989. Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) control with postemergence herbicides in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 3:267–271.Google Scholar
6. Hahn, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1988. The interaction between chlorimuron and quizalofop among several grass species. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:360.Google Scholar
7. Kells, J. J., Meggit, W. F., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143–149.Google Scholar
8. Kurtz, M. E. 1983. Experimental herbicides for bermudagrass control in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:36.Google Scholar
9. Retzinger, E. J. Jr., Rogers, R. L., and Moyers, R. P. 1983. Performance of BAS 9052 applied to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 31:796–800.Google Scholar
10. Schreiber, M. M., Warren, G. F., and Orwick, P. L. 1979. Effects of wetting agents, stage of growth, and species on selectivity of diclofop. Weed Sci. 27:679–683.Google Scholar
11. Vidrine, P. R. 1989. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:455–458.Google Scholar
12. Weed Science Society of America. 1989. Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science of America. Sixth Ed. WSSA, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar