Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:30:24.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preemergence Banded Herbicides Followed by Only One Between-Row Mowing Controls Weeds in Corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William W. Donald
William W. Donald*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 269 Agric. Engr. Bldg., UMC, Columbia, MO 65211
*
Author's E-mail: cny00431@centurytel.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research was conducted to determine the minimum number of between-row mowings necessary to control annual weeds, chiefly giant foxtail and common waterhemp, without corn yield loss. Over 2 yr in Missouri, the between-row mowing systems that were evaluated consisted of a 38-cm band of PRE atrazine plus metolachlor at 2.2 plus 2.2 kg ai/ha applied over corn grown in 76-cm rows shortly after planting followed by one, two, or three between-row mowings close to the soil surface. Based on rated total weed control, between-row total weed cover, and corn yield, the weed-free check was statistically indistinguishable from a treatment in which banded PRE herbicide was followed by only one between-row mowing, late, when weeds were relatively large. When mowed once at 52 to 64 days after planting (DAP), giant foxtail and common waterhemp were greater than 85 cm tall. The yield was not increased by mowing earlier or more than once.

Keywords

Atrazinemetolachlorgiant foxtail, Setaria faberii (L.) Beauv. #3, SETFAcommon waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer. #3 AMATAcorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3379’ #ZEAMXAlternative weed controlbandingbanded applicationcuttingmechanical weed controlnonchemical weed controlreduced rate herbicideBR, between rowIR, in row
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 143 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bedmar, F., Manetti, P., and Monterubbianesi, G. 1999. Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basis. Pesq. Agropec. Bowas. Basilia 34:187–193.Google Scholar
Belvins, R. L., Lai, R., Doran, J. W., Langdale, G. W., and Frye, W. W. 1998. Conservation tillage for erosion control and soil quality. in Perce, F. J. and Frye, W. W., eds. Advances in Soil and Water Conservation. Ann Arbor, MI: Sleeping Bear Press. Pp. 51–68.Google Scholar
Bicki, T. J., Wax, L. M., and Sipp, S. K. 1991. Evaluation of reduced herbicide application strategies for weed control in coarse-textured soils. J. Prod. Agric. 4:516–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W. 2000a. Between row mowing + in-row band-applied herbicide for weed control in Glycine max . Weed Sci. 48:487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, W. W. 2000b. Timing and frequency of between-row mowing and band-applied herbicide for annual weed control in soybean. Agron. J. 92:1013–1019.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W. and Johnson, W. G. 2003. Interference effects of weed-infested bands in or between crop rows on field corn (Zea mays) yield. Weed Technol. 17:755–763.Google Scholar
Donald, W. W., Kitchen, N. R., and Sudduth, K. A. 2001. Between-row mowing + banded herbicide to control annual weeds and reduce herbicide use in no-till soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15:576–584.Google Scholar
Eadie, A. G., Swanton, C. J., Shaw, J. E., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. Banded herbicide applications and cultivation in a modified no-till corn (Zea mays) system. Weed Technol. 6:535–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, G. T. and Mt. Pleasant, J. 1994. Competitive abilities of six corn (Zea mays) hybrids with four weed control practices. Weed Technol. 8:124–128.Google Scholar
Gaynor, J. D. and Van Wesenbeeck, I. J. 1995. Effects of band widths on atrazine, metribuzin, and metolachlor runoff. Weed Technol. 9:107–112.Google Scholar
Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40:441–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, H. M., Hartzler, R. G., and Erbach, D. C. 2000. High-speed cultivation and banding for weed management in no-till corn. Appl. Eng. Agric. 16:359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoshmand, A. R. 1994. Experiment Research Design and Analysis. A Practical Approach for Agricultural and Natural Sciences. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331–334.Google Scholar
Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybean. Weed Sci. 17:281–283.Google Scholar
Leblanc, M. L., Coutier, D. C., and Leroux, G. D. 1995. Reduced use of herbicides in corn through herbicide-banding combined with cultivations. Weed Res. 35:511–522.Google Scholar
Logan, T. J. 1987. An assessment of Great Lakes tillage practices and their potential impact on water quality. in Logan, T. J., Davidson, J. M., Baker, J. L., and Overcash, M. R., eds. Effects of Conservation Tillage on Groundwater Quality. Nitrates and Pesticides. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers. Pp. 271–277.Google Scholar
Logan, T. J. 1993. Agricultural best management practices for water pollution control: current issues. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 46:223–231.Google Scholar
Moomaw, R. S. and Robison, L. R. 1973. Broadcast or banded atrazine plus propachlor with tillage variables in corn. Weed Sci. 21:106–109.Google Scholar
Mulder, T. A. and Doll, J. D. 1993. Integrating reduced herbicide use with mechanical weeding in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7:382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napier, T. L., Tucker, M., and McCarter, S. 2000. Adoption of conservation production systems in three Midwest watersheds. J. Soil Water Conserv. 55:123–134.Google Scholar
Paarlberg, K. R., Hanna, H. M., Erbach, D. C., and Hartzler, R. G. 1998. Cultivator design for interrow weed control in no-till corn. Appl. Eng. Agric. 14:353–361.Google Scholar
Rajcan, I. and Swanton, C. J. 2001. Understanding maize-weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant. Field Crops Res. 71:139–150.Google Scholar
Richards, R. P. and Baker, D. B. 1993. Pesticide concentration patterns in agricultural drainage networks in the Lake Erie Basin. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12:13–26.Google Scholar
Rikoon, J. S., Constance, D. H., and Galetta, S. 1996. Factors affecting farmer's use and rejection of banded pesticide applications. J. Soil Water Conserv. 51:322–329.Google Scholar
Ruiz, J. A., Sanchez, J. J., and Goodman, M. M. 1998. Base temperature and heat unit requirements of 49 Mexican maize races. Maydica 43:277–282.Google Scholar
Santelmann, P. W., Meade, J. A., and Peters, R. A. 1963. Growth and development of yellow foxtail and giant foxtail. Weeds 11:139–142.Google Scholar
USDA–National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2004a. Agricultural chemical usage database. Web page: http://www.pestmanagement.info/nass/app_usage.cfm. Accessed: November 8, 2004.Google Scholar
USDA–National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2004b. Agricultural Chemical Usage. 2003 Field Crops Summary. Web page: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/other/pcu-bb/agcs0504.pdf. Accessed: November 16, 2004.Google Scholar