Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:19:04.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preemergence Herbicide Efficacy and Phytotoxicity in Grain Sorghum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Patrick W. Geier ,
Phillip W. Stahlman ,
David L. Regehr  and
Brian L. Olson
Patrick W. Geier*
Affiliation:
Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS 67601
Phillip W. Stahlman
Affiliation:
Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center, Hays, KS 67601
David L. Regehr
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506
Brian L. Olson
Affiliation:
Kansas State University Northwest Research and Extension Center, Colby, KS 67701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: pgeier@ksu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies conducted from 2005 to 2007 in Kansas compared the effects of KIH-485 and flufenacet to acetochlor and s-metolachlor applied PRE in grain sorghum. All treatments were combined with 1.12 kg/ha of atrazine for broadleaf weed control. KIH-485 and flufenacet, each at one time (1×) and two times (2×) the labeled rates, controlled large crabgrass 55 to 76% in 2005 and 94% or more in 2006 and 2007. In 2005, all herbicides controlled shattercane less than 20%, and only KIH-485 at the 2× rate controlled shattercane more than 70% in 2006 and 2007. Averaged over herbicides, green foxtail was controlled 98% in 2005, 77% in 2006, and 79% in 2007. Most herbicides controlled foxtail 86% or more when averaged over experiments, however, s-metolachlor at 1×, flufenacet at either rate, or atrazine alone did not. Sorghum was not stunted with KIH-485 or flufenacet in two of seven experiments. However, sorghum growth was reduced 23 to 54% with the 2× rates of KIH-485, flufenacet, or acetochlor in four experiments. Compared to the weed free control, sorghum stand establishment was reduced 18% with the 2× rate of flufenacet at Colby in 2006. At Hays in 2005, stand reductions occurred with acetochlor or KIH-485 at the 2× rates and either rate of flufenacet. Averaged over experiments, grain yields were reduced 9 and 10% with KIH-485 and flufenacet at the 2× rates, respectively. Where precipitation was greatest during the 2 wk following herbicide application, weed control was the best with these herbicides, but sorghum injury was also greatest.

Keywords

AcetochloratrazineflufenacetKIH-485, 3-[(5-difluoromethoxy-1-methyl-3-trifluoromethylpyrazol-4-yl)methylsulfonyl]-4,5-dihydro-5,5-dimethylisoxazoles-metolachlorgreen foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. SETVIlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSAshattercane, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench SORVUgrain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) MoenchCrop injurypyroxsulfonestand losssulfonylioxazolineweed control
Type
Weed Management—Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 197 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous 2003. Define DF Product Label. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer CropScience. 11.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2006. KIH-485 Experimental Herbicide Technical Information. White Plains, NY: K-I Chemical U.S.A. 8.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2007. Agricultural Chemical Use Database. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://www.pestmanagement.info/nass/app_usage.cfm. Accessed: January 26, 2007.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2009. Crop Production 2008 Summary. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/CropProdSu/CropProdSu-01-12-2009.pdf. Accessed: January 21, 2009.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C. and Lipke, W. G. 1962. The effect of applied water on preemergence applications of amiben. Weeds 10:100–103.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W., Stahlman, P. W., and Frihauf, J. C. 2006. KIH-485 and s-metolachlor efficacy comparisons in conventional and no-tillage corn. Weed Technol 20:622–626.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 2009. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: January 12, 2009.Google Scholar
King, S. R., Ritter, R. L., Hagood, E. S., and Menbere, H. 2006. Control of acetolactate synthase-resistant shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) in field corn with KIH-485. Weed Technol 21:578–582.Google Scholar
Lafarge, T. A. and Hammer, G. L. 2002. Predicting plant leaf area production: shoot assimilate accumulation and partitioning, and leaf area ratio, are stable for a wide range of sorghum population densities. Field Crops Res 77:137–151.Google Scholar
Larson, E. J. and Vanderlip, R. L. 1994. Grain sorghum yield response to nonuniform stand reductions. Agron. J. 86:475–477.Google Scholar
SAS 2000. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 8.0. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1686.Google Scholar
Shroyer, J., Kok, H., and Fjell, D. 1998. Seedbed preparation and planting practices. Pages 5–9. in. Grain Sorghum Production Handbook. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service. C-687.Google Scholar
Splittstoesser, W. E. and Dersheid, L. A. 1962. Effects of environment upon herbicides applied preemergence. Weeds 10:304–307.Google Scholar
Stahlman, P. W. and Wicks, G. A. 2000. Weeds and their control in grain sorghum. Pages 535–690. In Smith, C. W. and Frederiksen, R. A. Sorghum: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Steele, G. L., Porpiglia, P. J., and Chandler, J. M. 2005. Efficacy of KIH-485 on Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) and selected broadleaf weeds. Weed Technol 19:866–869.Google Scholar