Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:26:28.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preemergence Weed Control in Direct-Seeded Watermelon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Lynn P. Brandenberger*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Oklahoma State, 360 Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078-6027
James W. Shrefler
Affiliation:
Wes Watkins Agriculture Research and Extension Center, P.O. Box 128, Lane, OK 74555-0128
Charles L. Webber III
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, South Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 159, Lane, OK 74555
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Mark E. Payton
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University, 301 Math Sci., Stillwater, OK 74078
Lynda K. Wells
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Oklahoma State, 360 Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078-6027
Marilyn McClelland
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: lynn.brandenberger@okstate.edu

Abstract

Studies were conducted at eight sites during a 3-yr period in Oklahoma and Arkansas to determine the effectiveness and safety of preemergence applications of halosulfuron both alone and in tank mixtures with bensulide, clomazone, ethalfluralin, and naptalam. Ethalfluralin, naptalam plus bensulide, and sulfentrazone also were applied alone. Although halosulfuron caused up to 20% seedling stunting, watermelon plants recovered by 5 to 7 wk after planting, and yield was similar to that of hand-weeded plots. Halosulfuron treatments controlled hophornbeam copperleaf, Palmer amaranth, carpetweed, and cutleaf groundcherry 80 to 100%. Control of goosegrass was at least 97% with clomazone plus ethalfluralin plus halosulfuron. Injury to watermelon treated with sulfentrazone ranged from 76 to 98% at 2 to 4 wk after treatment. This was reflected by yields that were lower than any other herbicide treatment in the studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2003. Sandea® product label. Yuma, AZ: Gowan. 13 p.Google Scholar
Baldwin, F., Santelmann, P., and Greer, H. 1974. Weed control systems for hophornbeam copperleaf control in peanuts. Agron. J. 66:789792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, V. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Germination, control, and competition of cutleaf groundcherry (Physalis angulata) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:133138.Google Scholar
Bensch, C. N., Horak, J. J., and Peterson, D. 2003. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci. 51:3743.Google Scholar
Boyhan, G. B., Kovach, S. P., Norton, J. D., Abrahams, B. R., Hollingsworth, M. H., and Dangler, J. M. 1995. Preemergent herbicides for cantaloupe and watermelon. J. Veg. Crop Prod. 1:7992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. and Masiunas, J. 2002. Evaluation of herbicides for pumpkin (Cucurbita spp). Weed Technol. 16:282292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buker, R. S. III and Stall, W. M. 2001. Halosulfuron rate and timing application effects on summer squash and muskmelon. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 54:77.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Gimenez, A. E., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) control with glyphosate and 2,4-DB mixtures in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:5661.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Goldwasser, Y., Achdary, G., and Hershemhorn, J. 2003. The potential of sulfosulfuron to control troublesome weeds in tomato. Weed Technol. 17:133137.Google Scholar
Fennimore, S. A., Lanini, W. T., Bell, C. E., and McGiffen, M. E. 1999. Evaluation of low-rate herbicides for potential use in vegetable crops. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 52:8284.Google Scholar
Fennimore, S. A. and Richard, S. J. 1999. Screening of low rate herbicides in vegetable crops. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep. 53:4446.Google Scholar
Flower, K. C. 2001. Clomazone for control of grasses in flue-cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) seedbeds. Weed Technol. 15:617622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzler, R. G. and Foy, C. L. 1983. Efficacy of three postemergence grass herbicides for soybeans. Weed Sci. 31:557561.Google Scholar
Hoyt, G. D., Bonanno, A. R., and Parker, G. C. 1996. Influence of herbicides and tillage on weed control, yield, and quality of cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata). Weed Technol. 10:5054.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. C. and Mullinix, B. G. 2002. Weed management in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and cantaloupe (Cucumis melo) transplanted on polyethylene-covered seedbeds. Weed Technol. 16:860866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Bonte, D. R., Harrison, H. F., and Motsenbocker, C. E. 1999. Sweetpotato clone tolerance to weed interference. Hort. Sci. 34:229232.Google Scholar
Mason, J. F., Baldwin, F. L., Greer, H. A., and Santelmann, P. W. 1975. Postemergence control of hophornbeam copperleaf. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:48.Google Scholar
Mayo, C. M., Horak, M. J., Peterson, D. E., and Boyer, J. E. 1995. Differential control of four amaranthus species by six postemergence herbicides in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 9:141147.Google Scholar
Miller, T. W. and Libbey, C. R. 1999. Tolerance of cucumber, squash, and pumpkin to several herbicides. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Research Prog. Rep. 53:6264.Google Scholar
Monks, D. W., Schultheis, J. R., and Mills, R. J. 1996. Effects of weeds and herbicides on sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) transplant production using polyethylene bed covers. Weed Technol. 10:273277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, W. C. 1993. Pursuit herbicide for weed control in southern peas. Louisiana Agriculture 36:20.Google Scholar
Rushing, D. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1985. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). II. Tumble pigweed (Amaranthus albus). Weed Sci. 33:815818.Google Scholar
Scott, G. H., Askew, S. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Glyphosate systems for weed control in glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 16:191198.Google Scholar
Talbert, R. E., Schmidt, L. A., and Wells, J. A. 1998. Field evaluation of herbicides on small fruit, vegetable, and ornamental crops, 1998. Arkansas Agric. Exp. Stat. Res. Series 467. Pp. 1112.Google Scholar
Umeda, K. 2002. Efficacy and safety of new herbicides for melon production in the desert southwest United States. in Maynard, D., ed. Cucurbitaceaeed. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Horticultural Science. Pp. 404408.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 235237.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2002. Weed survey—southern states, vegetable, fruit, and nut crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:245247.Google Scholar
Wells, J. J. 1999. Yellow nutsedge control in summer vegetables and development of glyphosate-tolerant spinach. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR. Pp. 6366.Google Scholar
Westberg, D. E., Oliver, L. R., and Frans, R. E. 1989. Weed control with clomazone alone and with other herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:678685.Google Scholar
Wilhm, J. L., Thilsted, W. E., and Murray, D. S. 1979. Weed control in peanuts and soybeans with S-734. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:57.Google Scholar
Xia, G. J., Li, X. L., and Yang, H. W. 1997. Preliminary study on competition between soybean and goosegrass. Soybean Sci. 16:352354.Google Scholar