Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:25:12.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rapid Determination of Glyphosate Injury to Plants and Identification of Glyphosate-Resistant Plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Bijay K. Singh
Affiliation:
American Cyanamid Company, P.O. Box 400, Princeton, NJ 08543-0400
Dale L. Shaner
Affiliation:
American Cyanamid Company, P.O. Box 400, Princeton, NJ 08543-0400

Abstract

Drift of glyphosate may cause injury to nontarget plant species. Herbicidal damage caused by glyphosate may be attributed to the herbicides that inhibit acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) or acetyl CoA carboxylase (ACCase), because the time taken to show herbicidal damage and the visual injury symptoms caused by these three types of herbicides are similar. Glyphosate inhibits the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis which causes accumulation of shikimate in plants. A modified, simpler method of extraction and assay for detection of shikimate in plants has been adapted from previously published procedures. With this assay, rapid accumulation of shikimate was observed in glyphosate-sensitive plants that have been treated with glyphosate. Furthermore, the accumulation of shikimate in herbicide-sensitive plants was only due to glyphosate and not due to an AHAS or an ACCase inhibitor. Therefore, high levels of shikimate in a damaged plant indicate glyphosate injury. With this assay, no accumulation of shikimate was seen in a glyphosate-resistant variety of soybean. Therefore, lack of accumulation of shikimate in a glyphosate-treated weed or crop species indicates that the plant is resistant to glyphosate.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Amrhein, N., Deus, B., Gehrke, P., Hollander, H., Schab, J., Schulz, A., and Steinrucken, H. 1981. Interference of glyphosate with the shikimate pathway. Proc. Plant Growth Regul. Soc. Am. 8:99106.Google Scholar
Amrhein, N., Deus, B., Gehrke, P., and Steinrucken, H. 1980. The site of inhibition of the shikimate pathway by glyphosate. Plant Physiol. 66:830834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, F. 1996. An extension perspective on herbicide resistant crops. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 36:93.Google Scholar
Becerril, J., Duke, S., and Lydon, J. 1989. Glyphosate effects on shikimate pathway products in leaves and flowers of velvetleaf. Phytochemistry 28:695699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaitonde, M. and Gordon, M. 1958. A microchemical method for the detection and determination of shikimic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 230:10431050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, D. 1996. Roundup Ready soybeans. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 36:93.Google Scholar
Hollander-Czytko, H. and Amrhein, A. 1983. Subcellular compartmentation of shikimic acid and phenylalanine in buckwheat cell suspension cultures grown in the presence of shikimate pathway inhibitors. Plant Sci. Lett. 29:8996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratley, J., Baines, P., Eberbach, P., Incerti, M., and Broster, J. 1996. Glyphosate Resistance in Annual Rye Grass. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Grassland Society of New South Wales. 112 p.Google Scholar
Rubin, J., Gaines, R., and Jensen, R. 1982. Enzymological basis for herbicidal action of glyphosate. Plant Physiol. 70:833839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed