Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:03:09.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduced Rates of Herbicides Following Hilling Controlled Weeds in Conventional and Reduced Tillage Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Robin R. Bellinder
Affiliation:
Dep. Fruit and Veg. Sci., Plant Sci. Bldg., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-0327
Russell W. Wallace
Affiliation:
Dep. Fruit and Veg. Sci., Plant Sci. Bldg., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-0327
Erik D. Wilkins
Affiliation:
Dep. Fruit and Veg. Sci., Plant Sci. Bldg., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-0327

Abstract

Time of hilling (4, 5, or 6 weeks after planting; WAP) and 0.5x, 1x, and split (0.5x + 0.5x) rates of metolachlor + metribuzin were evaluated in conventional tillage (CT) and rye-stubble, reduced tillage (RT) potato plots. Weed populations 4 to 10 WAP were generally higher in CT than in RT. Weed control was excellent in both tillage systems when 1x rates of metolachlor + metribuzin were applied delayed preemergence, or in a split application where 0.5x was applied delayed PRE and hilled 6 WAP, and followed with a second application of 0.5x metolachlor + metribuzin 7 days after hilling (DAH). Weed control with 0.5x rates of metolachlor + metribuzin applied 7 DAH, when hilled 4 and 5 WAP, was equivalent to the lx and split-rate treatments. Weed control was reduced only when hilling was delayed to 6 WAP and 0.5x of metolachlor + metribuzin applied 7 DAH. Total yields were not influenced by tillage, hilling, or herbicide treatment, however, larger numbers of green and small-sized tubers reduced marketable yields in RT.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1972. United States standards for grades of potatoes, revised Feb. 5, 1972. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Marketing Serv. Washington. D.C. Google Scholar
2. Barnes, J. P., and Putnam, A. R. 1983. Rye residues contribute to weed suppression in no-tillage cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:10451057.Google Scholar
3. Barnes, J. P., and Putnam, A. R. 1986. Evidence for allelopathy by residues and aqueous extracts of rye (Secale cereale). J. Chem. Ecol. 34:384390.Google Scholar
4. Barnes, J. P., Putnam, A. R., Burke, B. A., and Aasen, A. J. 1987. Isolation and characterization of allelochemicals in rye herbage. Phytochemistry: 26:13851390.Google Scholar
5. Bellinder, R. R., Gummesson, G., and Karlson, C. 1994. Percentage-driven government mandates for pesticide reduction: The Swedish model. Weed Technol. 8:350359.Google Scholar
6. Bennett, O. L., Mitchell, D., Mathias, E. L., and Lundberg, P. E. 1975. No-tillage production systems for potatoes. Agron. Abstr. Am. Soc. Agron., p. 157.Google Scholar
7. Calihan, R. H., and Bellinder, R. R. 1993. Management of Weeds in Potato Health Management. APS Plant Health Management Series. pgs. 95102.Google Scholar
8. Chase, W. R., Nair, M. G., Putnam, A. R., and Mishra, S. K. 1991. 2,2‵-Oxo-1,1ξ-azobenzene: microbial transformation of rye (Secale cereale L.) allelochemical in field soils by Acinetohacter calcoaceticus . J. Chem. Ecol. 17:15751584.Google Scholar
9. Chepil, W. S., 1946. Germination of weed seeds: II. The influence of tillage treatments on germination. Sci. Agric. 26:347357.Google Scholar
10. Dallyn, S. L., 1971. Weed control methods in potatoes. Am. Potato J. 48:116124.Google Scholar
11. Dallyn, S. L., and Fricke, D. H. 1974. The use of minimum tillage plus herbicides in potato production. Am. Potato J. 51:177184.Google Scholar
12. Grant, W. J., and Epstein, E. 1973. Minimum tillage for potatoes. Am. Potato J. 50:193203.Google Scholar
13. Hayes, W. A., 1982. What is minimum tillage? p. 1534 in Hayes, W. A., ed., Minimum Tillage Farming. No-till Farmer, Inc., Brookfield, WI.Google Scholar
14. Lanfranconi, L. E., Bellinder, R. R., and Wallace, R. W. 1993. Grain rye residues and weed control strategies in reduced tillage potatoes. Weed Technol. 7:2328.Google Scholar
15. Schuler, R. T., 1979. Reduced tillage studies in potatoes following corn. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng., Pap. No. 79–1524.Google Scholar
16. Shilling, D. G., Liebl, R. A., and Worsham, A. D. 1985. Rye (Secale cereale L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) mulch: The suppression of certain broadleaved weeds and the isolation and identification of phytotoxins. p. 243–27 in Thompson, A. C., ed., The Chemistry of Allelopathy. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. 268.Google Scholar
17. Thornton, R. E., and Sieczka, J. B., ed. 1980. Commercial Potato Production in North America. Am. Potato J. Suppl. 57:36.Google Scholar
18. Van Gessel, M. J., and Renner, K. A. 1990. Effect of soil type, hilling time and weed interference on potato (Solanum tuberosum) development and yield. Weed Technol. 4:299305.Google Scholar
19. Wallace, R. W., and Bellinder, R. R. 1989. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) yields and weed populations in conventional and reduced tillage systems. Weed Technol. 3:590595.Google Scholar
20. Wallace, R. W., and Bellinder, R. R. 1990. Low-rate applications of herbicides in conventional and reduced tillage potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 4:509513.Google Scholar
21. Wood, S. D., and Worsham, A. D. 1986. Reducing soil erosion in tobacco fields with no-tillage transplanting. J. Soil Water Conserv. 41:193196.Google Scholar
22. Yennish, J. P., Worsham, A.D., and Chilton, W. S. 1995. Disappearance of DIBOA-glucoside, DIBOA, and BOA from rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop residue. Weed Sci. 43:1820.Google Scholar
23. Young, H. M. Jr., 1982. No-tillage, the ultimate? p. 1630 in H. M., Young Jr., ed. No-tillage Farming. No-till Farmer, Inc., Brookfield, WI.Google Scholar